In this article, I follow the construction of the public fiction of the 2002 Raëlians' cloning claims as a site of liminal, or transitional, space for scientific knowledge production. In 2002, the Raëlians, a new religious movement, announced the successful birth of Baby Eve, allegedly, the first clone. Baby Eve was quickly denounced as a hoax. Within the media frenzy that led up to and followed Baby Eve's birth, the voices of a core set of pro-cloning scientists emerged as experts in constructing human cloning. These experts used the Raëlians' claims to settle several controversies about human cloning: reproductive cloning was unethical while therapeutic cloning was desirable; scientists who advocated reproductive cloning were immoral; and human cloning was too complex to be achieved by anyone working outside mainstream scientific institutions. Though Baby Eve is undoubtedly a fictional construct, she offered the world an important opportunity to engage the science fiction-like implications of human cloning as if they were real.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advanced Cell Technologies (2001) " Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. (ACT) Today Announced Publication of its Research on Human Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer and Parthenogenesis," press release. URL: http://www.advancedcell.com/press-release/advanced-cell-technology-inc-act-today-announced-publication-of-its-research-on-human-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-and-parthenogenesis (accessed 3 October 2007).
2.
American Academy for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2003) "Expressing Strong Concern at Human Cloning Reports, AAAS Cautions Against Overreaction" URL: http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2003/0102cloning.shtml (accessed August 2006).
3.
Boczkowski, P. (2004) Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press .
4.
Boisselier, B. (2003) Clonaid, Latest News: Dr. Boisselier statement , 15 October. URL: http://www.clonaid.com/news.php?12 (accessed 3 October 2006).
5.
Cibelli, J., Lanza, R., West, M. and Ezzell, C. (2002) "The First Cloned Human Embryo," Scientific American286(1): 44-51.
6.
Clonaid (2004) Clonaid, Latest News: Alive and Well, 27 March. URL: http://www.clonaid.com/news.php?4.2.2 (accessed 3 October 2006).
7.
CNN (2003) Transcript with Dr. Robert Lanza. URL: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0212/29/sm.05.html (accessed September 2006).
8.
Cole-Turner, R. (1999) "Faith Meets the Human Genome Project: Religious Factors in the Public Response to Genetics," Public Understanding of Science8: 207-14.
9.
Dawson, L. (2003) Cults and New Religious Movements: A Reader. MaldonBlackwell.
10.
Evans, J. (2002) "Religion and Human Cloning: An Exploratory Analysis of the First Available Opinion Data," Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion41(4): 747-58.
11.
Gibbs, N. (2001) "Baby, It's You! And You, And You … Renegade Scientists Say They Are Ready to Start Applying the Technology of Cloning to Human Beings: Can They Really Do It, and How Scary Would That Be?," Time Magazine 19 February. URL: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999233-9,00.html (accessed 3 October 2007).
12.
Gieryn, T. (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Haraway, D. (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
14.
Hartouni, V. (1997) Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
Herrissone-Kelly, P. (2005) "The Cloning Debate in the United Kingdom: The Academy Meets the Public," Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics14(3): 268-76.
16.
Holliman, R. (2004) "Media Coverage of Cloning: a Study of Media Content, Production and Reception," Public Understanding of Science13: 107-30.
17.
Ingram-Waters, M. (2006) "The Dueling Fictions of Parthenogenesis: Crossing the Science/Literature Boundaries of Knowledge Construction," pp. 139-158 in A. Bamme, G. Getzinger and B. Weiser (eds) Yearbook 2006 of the Institute for Advanced Studies on Science, Technology, and Society. Vienna: Profil.
18.
Irving, D. (1999) "When do Human Beings Begin? Scientific Myths and Scientific Facts," The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy19(3-4): 22-46.
19.
Jelen, T. and Wilcox, C. (2003) "Causes and Consequences of Public Attitudes toward Abortion: A Review and Research Agenda," Political Research Quarterly56(4): 489-500.
20.
Johnson, J. and Williams, E. (2005) Human Cloning, Congressional Research Service. Washington, DC: The Library of Congress.
21.
Kaplan, E. and Squier, S. (1999) "Introduction," in E. Kaplan and S. Squier (eds) Playing Dolly: Technocultural Formations, Fantasies, and Fictions of Assisted Reproduction, pp. 1-13. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
22.
Kuhn, T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Lanza, R., Cibelli, J. and West, M. (1999) "Human Therapeutic Cloning," Nature America5(9): 975-7.
24.
Loe, M. (2004) The Rise of Viagra: How the Little Blue Pill Changed Sex in America. New York: New York University Press.
25.
Mitchell, S. (2003) "Cloning Ban Bill Reintroduced to Congress," Hawaii Reporter 17 January.
26.
Moore, T. and Hanlon, M. (2000) "Cult in First Bid to Clone Human," Daily Express (London, UK) 11 October (accessed online at LexisNexis).
27.
Nerlich, B. and Clarke, D. (2003) "Anatomy of a Media Event: How Arguments Clashed in the 2001 Human Cloning Debate," New Genetics and Society22(1): 43-59.
28.
Nisbet, M. (2004) "The Polls-Trends: Public Opinion about Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning," Public Opinion Quarterly68(1): 131-54.
29.
Palmer, S. (2004) Aliens Adored: Raël's UFO Religion. NewsBrunswick: Rutgers University Press.
30.
Penley, C. (1997) NASA/TREK: Popular Science and Sex in America. New York: Verso.
31.
Petersen, A. (2001) "Biofantasies: Genetics and Medicine in the Print News Media," Social Science and Medicine52(8): 1255-68.
32.
Pinch, T. and Bijker, W. (1984) "The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other," Social Studies of Science14(3): 399-441.
33.
Priest, S. (2001) A Grain of Truth: The Media, the Public, and Biotechnology . New York: Rowman and Littlefield .
34.
Raël (2001) Yes to Human Cloning: Eternal Life Thanks to Science. Vaduz, Liechtenstein: The Raëlian Foundation.
35.
Revill, J. (2004) "Scientists Pour Scorn on Doctor's Human Clone Boast: Uproar at News Conference as US Fertility Maverick Drops Genetic Bombshell ," The Observer 18 January: 5.
36.
Robison, S. (2003) "Media Reaction to Raëlian Cloning Claim," Genetic Crossroads 12 January: 28.
37.
Schatten, G., Prather, R. and Wilmut, I. (2003) "Cloning Claim is Science Fiction, not Science ," Science299(5605) (17 January): 344.
38.
Scheitle, C. (2005) "In God We Trust: Religion and Optimism toward Biotechnology," Social Science Quarterly86(4): 846-56.
39.
Schwab, G. (1999) "Steps toward a Millennial Imaginary: Reproductive Fantasies in Cussin's `Confessions of a Bioterrorist'," in E. Kaplan and S. Squier (eds) Playing Dolly: Technocultural Formations, Fantasies, and Fictions of Assisted Reproduction, pp. 232-40. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
40.
Simon, B. (2002) Undead Science: Science Studies and the Afterlife of Cold Fusion. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
41.
Squier, S. (1994) Babies in Bottles: Twentieth Century Visions of Reproductive Technology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
42.
Squier, S. (2004) Liminal Lives: Imagining the Human at the Frontiers of Biomedicine. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
43.
Steinmuller, K. (2003) "The Uses and Abuses of Science Fiction," Interdisciplinary Science Reviews28(3): 175-8.
44.
United States House of Representatives (HOR) ( 2001) Hearing: "Issues Raised by Human Cloning Research." Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
45.
Waters, B. and Cole-Turner, R. (2003) God and the Embryo: Religious Voices on Stem Cells and Cloning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
46.
Wikipedia (2007) "Raleian Church Membership Estimates" URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ra%C3%ABlian_Church_membership_estimates (accessed August 2007).
47.
Williams, C., Kitzinger, J. and Henderson, L. (2003) "Envisioning the Embryo in Stem Cell Research: Rhetorical Strategies and Media Reporting of the Ethical Debates," Sociology of Health and Illness25(7): 793-814.
48.
Wilmut, I., Campbell, K. and Tudge, C. (2000) The Second Creation: Dolly and the Age of Biological Control. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
49.
Young, E. (2002) "First Cloned Baby Born on 26 December," New Scientist. URL: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3217 (accessed September 2006).
