The integration of Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) technologies into library presents a transformative opportunity to enhance user experiences, promote innovative learning, and improve access to information. The purpose of this research is to examine the state of research on the virtual and augmented reality in the library including understanding the hotspots and new research directions. The study was conducted using bibliometrics approach based on data collected from Scopus database. The retrieval yielded 4001 items and covered the period 1973 and 2023. The years 2020–2023 mark the most substantial period of activity. The keywords cluster in four categories namely - technological components and applications, and computational methods, human and social aspects of VR/AR use, and interface and user interaction. The research hotspots are (1) Core Technologies, (2) Applications, and (3) Research Methodologies and Trends while the three emerging areas are - Emerging Technologies and Methods, Class 2: User Interaction and Interface Design, Class 3: Niche Applications in Libraries. The integration of VR and AR into library systems demonstrates their evolution from experimental concepts to practical tools, enhancing user engagement and supporting academic, cultural, and educational functions. The study of VR and AR in libraries reveals a clear trajectory of growth and maturity, with research efforts expanding significantly, particularly after 2000. Advances in technology and evolving user needs—such as remote access demands during the COVID-19 pandemic—have driven innovation, shifting the focus from foundational studies to applied, mature research in library settings.
AdamsABlandfordA (2005) Digital libraries’ support for the user’s information journey. In: JCDL ’05: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries, Denver, CO, 7–11 June. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
2.
AhnJAKimEMLeeJE, et al. (2024) Diabetes education program for nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nursing Open11(12): e70105.
3.
AstheimerPFelgerWMüllerS (1993) Virtual design: A generic VR system for industrial applications. Computer Graphics17: 671–677.
4.
AzumaRT (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Presence6(4): 355–385.
5.
BailensonJ (2018) Experience on Demand: What Virtual Reality is, How It Works, and What It Can Do. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
6.
BarrettA (2020) Digital preservation and cultural heritage: A guide for librarians and archivists. In: Euro-mediterranean conference2 November 2020, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg.
7.
BaxmannMBaráthZKárpátiK (2024) Efficacy of typodont and simulation training in orthodontic education: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education24: 1443.
8.
BekeleMKChampionE (2019) A comparison of immersive realities and interaction methods: Cultural learning in virtual heritage. Frontiers in Robotics and AI6: 91.
9.
BillinghurstMDuenserA (2012) Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer45: 56–63.
10.
BillinghurstMKatoHPoupyrevI (2001) The MagicBook: A transitional AR interface. Computer Graphics25(5): 745–753.
11.
BioccaFDelaneyB (1995) Immersive Virtual Reality Technology. Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, pp.57–124.
12.
BishopR (2018) Designing inclusive libraries: The role of VR and AR in accessibility. Journal of Library Administration58(3): 225–237.
13.
BönischKMehlerABabbiliS, et al. (2025) Viki LibraRy: Collaborative hypertext browsing and navigation in virtual reality. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia31(1–2): 45–75.
14.
BorgmanCL (2003) From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure: Access to Information in the Networked World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
BörnerK (2021) Atlas of Knowledge: Anyone Can Map. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
BoultonCAKentCWilliamsHTP (2018) Virtual learning environment engagement and learning outcomes at a ‘bricks-and-mortar’ university. Computers & Education126(2018): 129–142.
17.
BrennanR (2020) Virtual reality in cultural heritage: Applications and future directions. Journal of Digital Humanities6(2): 105–118.
18.
British Library (2020) Virtual Exhibits and Digital Experiences. London.
19.
BrunoFMuzzupappaM (2010) Survey on virtual reality applications in museums. Computer Graphics34(1): 27–38.
20.
CarruthDW (2017) Virtual reality for education and workforce training. In: 15th international conference on emerging elearning technologies and applications, pp.1–6. IEEE.
21.
CaudellTPMizellDW (1992) Augmented reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth hawaii international conference on system sciences, vol. 2, pp.659–669.
22.
ChangEMoralesESzékelyG (2019) Augmented reality applications in libraries: A systematic review. Library & Information Science Research41(1): 10–22.
23.
ChenYHuangJ (2021) Augmented reality in education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Technology Research and Development69(3): 615–641.
24.
CimVSHounsellMDS (2023) Augmented reality for assembly training in industry: A systematic literature mapping. In: VR ’23: Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (Brazilian Computing Society) ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Rio Grande, Brazil, 6–9 November, pp.77–87. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
25.
CodellaCFJaliliRKovedL, et al. (1993) Toolkit for developing multi-user, distributed virtual environments. In: IEEE annual virtual reality international symposium, Seattle, WA, 18–22 September, pp.401–407. New York: IEEE.
26.
De OliveiraTRRodriguesBBDa SilvaMM, et al. (2023) Virtual reality solutions employing artificial intelligence methods: A systematic literature review. ACM Computing Surveys55: 3565020.
27.
DharEUpadhyayUHuangY, et al. (2023) A scoping review to assess the effects of virtual reality in medical education and clinical care. Digital Health9: 20552076231158022.
28.
DixonPAlexanderCMichelsA (2019) Innovations in library learning: VR and AR in education. Library Management40(1–2): 86–97.
29.
DoeDMChenDHanK, et al. (2023) Vision language model-empowered contract theory for AIGC task allocation in teleoperation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems24(10): 11225–11237.
30.
DolezalMChmelikJLiarokapisF (2017) An immersive virtual environment for collaborative geovisualization. VS-GAMES, pp.272–275
31.
EbrahimiMSimmondsDClarkJS (2023) Exploring virtual and augmented reality STEM learning experiences with American K-12 students: A scoping review. Journal of Interactive Learning Research34(4): 575–604.
32.
FergusonSMcCarthyJ (2021) Makerspaces and STEM learning in libraries: A review of current practices. Library & Information Science Research43(1): 101084.
33.
FernandezP (2025) “Through the looking glass: Envisioning new library technologies” a glimpse into the future of augmented reality. Library Hi Tech News42(1): 1–5.
GreenspanSHookerJ (2022) Semantic visualization for educational environments. Educational Technology Research and Development70(3): 145–160.
36.
GuevaraJVillanuevaPDiazL (2021) AR and VR for education: Emerging trends in libraries. Educational Technology & Society24(3): 87–97.
37.
HannahMHuberSMateiS (2019) Virtual Reality in the Academic Library: Emerging Practices and Trends. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
38.
HeiligM (1962) Sensorama Patent. US Patent No. 3050870. New York, NY: United States Patent and Trademark Office.
39.
HuXSuRHeL (2016) The design and implementation of the 3D educational game based on VR headsets. In: International symposium on educational technology, pp.53–56.
40.
HuangT-LLiaoS (2015) A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: The moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research15: 269–295.
41.
JohnsonLBeckerSEstradaV (2020) Libraries in the age of digital transformation. Horizon Report: Library Edition29(1): 15–23.
42.
KatoHBillinghurstM (1999) Marker tracking and HMD calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE and ACM international workshop on augmented reality (IWAR 99), pp.85–94.
43.
KelleyTRoesHMcClureK (2020) Virtual library tours: Enhancing user experience in digital environments. Journal of Academic Librarianship46(2): 102–109.
44.
KentSL (2001) The Ultimate History of Video Games: From Pong to Pokémon and Beyond. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
45.
KeshavarzBCamposJLGoldingJF (2020) A multisensory approach to understanding immersive environments. Multisensory Research33(7–8): 601–615.
46.
LanierJ (1987) Virtual Reality: History, Applications, and Technology. Redwood City, CA: VPL Research Publications.
47.
LeeH (2019) Ethical challenges in VR technology adoption in libraries. Library Ethics Quarterly12(4): 45–62.
48.
LeydesdorffL (2007) Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(9): 1303–1309.
49.
LeydesdorffL (2010) The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology44(1): 365–417.
50.
LeydesdorffL (2015) Measuring the meaning of words in contexts: An automated analysis of controversies about ‘monetary stability. Scientometrics103(1): 349–376.
51.
LiarokapisFDebattistaKVourvopoulosA, et al. (2014) Comparing interaction techniques for serious games through brain-computer interfaces: A user perception evaluation study. Entertainment Computing5: 391–399.
52.
LinNDingYTanY (2025) Optimization design and application of library face recognition access control system based on improved PCA. PLoS ONE20(1): e0313415.
53.
LiuZ (2004) Perceptions of credibility of scholarly information on the web. Information Processing & Management40(6): 1027–1038.
54.
LodhiRNDel GessoCAsifM, et al. (2024) Exploring virtual and augmented reality in the hospitality industry: A bibliometric analysis. Tourism and Hospitality Management30: 67–84.
55.
LópezMNavarroMRomeroF (2010) Haptic technologies for enhanced interaction with virtual objects. In: Haptics symposium proceedings. IEEE.
56.
McClureKO’BrienJ (2020) Building the future: Integrating VR and AR into library services. Library Management41(3): 115–128.
57.
MichelsAAlexanderC (2020) Engaging users through VR workshops in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries81(6): 1035–1046.
58.
MillerJ (2019) Navigating libraries in the digital age: The role of AR technology. Journal of Library Innovation10(2): 56–73.
59.
MillsDL (1976) An overview of the distributed computer network. In: AFIPS conference proceedings - national computer conference AFIPS 1976.
60.
MurrayJH (2017) Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61.
NgDTKLaiWYWJongMSY, et al. (2024) Using cospaces in augmented reality digital story creation: A thematic analysis. Computers & Education5: 100090.
62.
NugentWR (1991) Imaging: Fine arts. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 42(8): 589–596.
63.
NwagwuWE (2023) Nature and characteristics of global attention to research on article processing charges. Journal of Academic Librarianship49(6): 102808e.
64.
NwagwuWEWilliamsCB (2022) Knowledge mapping and visualisation of personal information management literature, 1988–2021. IFLA Journal48(4): 598–621.
65.
OppenheimC (1993) Virtual reality and the virtual library. Information Services & Use13(3): 215–227.
66.
PatelDZhouF (2021) Haptic technologies for inclusive library services. Journal of Library Innovation10(3): 99–112.
67.
PatraNK (2021) Disruptive innovative library services @ international Nalanda University: Present and future roadmaps. Library Philosophy and Practice2021: 1–21.
68.
Perianes-RodriguezAWaltmanLvan EckNJ (2016) Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics10(4): 1178–1195.
PoulterA (1993) Towards a virtual reality library. In: Aslib proceedings.
71.
RadiantiJMajchrzakTFrommJ, et al. (2020) A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education147: 104032.
72.
RaittD (1991) The electronic library manager’s guide to virtual reality. The Electronic Library9(1): 3–5.
73.
RebolMLakeBReinischM, et al. (2023) Holographic sports training. In: ISS 2023 - Proceedings of the 2023 conference on interactive surfaces and spaces, Pittsburgh, PA, 5–8 November, pp.70–73. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
74.
RobertsonA (2016) Sony’s playStation VR launches today, finally bringing virtual reality to the console. The Verge.
75.
RoesHMcCarthyJFergusonS (2021) Future directions for library services: VR and AR in public and academic libraries. Library Trends69(2): 250–269.
76.
SchavemakerJvan BeurdenMReindersM (2010) Layar: The first augmented reality browser. In: IEEE computer society consumer electronics magazine, pp.19–21.
77.
SchottenMAisatiMMeesterWJN, et al. (2017) A Brief History of Scopus: The World’s Largest Abstract and Citation Database of Scientific Literature. Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach.
78.
SerinoMCordreyKMcLaughlinL, et al. (2016) Pokémon go and augmented virtual reality games: A cautionary commentary for parents and pediatricians. Current Opinion in Pediatrics28(5): 673–677.
79.
ShneidermanBPlaisantCCohenM, et al. (eds) (2016) Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 6th edn.Boston, MA: Pearson.
80.
SlaterMWilburS (1997) A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence6(6): 603–616.
81.
SlocumCHuangJChenJ (2021) VIA: Visibility-aware web-based virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM international conference on 3D web technology (Web3D ’21), Pisa, Italy, 8–12 November, pp.1–9. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
82.
SmithJJohnsonLLeeK (2022) A comprehensive review of cross-validation techniques in machine learning model evaluation. Journal of Machine Learning Research15: 123–145.
83.
SmithR, et al. (2022) Immersive technology and future library design. Library Hi Tech40(1): 67–83.
84.
SonnenwaldDH (2016) Information behavior in dynamic virtual spaces. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67(9): 2134–2147.
85.
SutherlandIE (1968) A head-mounted three-dimensional display. In: Proceedings of the December 9–11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, Part I, pp.757–764.
86.
TsaiB (1992) A theory of information genetics: How four subforces generate information evolution? In: Proceedings of the 55th ASIS Annual Meeting, pp.47–56. Association for Information Science and Technology. Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
87.
VaraV (2014) Facebook bets on future of virtual reality with $2 billion oculus deal. The Wall Street Journal.
88.
WalshAInskipC (2022) Augmented libraries: Emerging roles for AR in library spaces. Library Trends70(4): 543–558.
89.
WheelerRL (1973) IBM OS/VS1? An evolutionary growth system. AFIPS Conference Proceedings of the National Computer Conference and Exposition42: 529–537.
90.
YuSKimDParkJ (2020) Accessibility in virtual environments for library users with disabilities. Assistive Technology Quarterly18(2): 62–75.
