Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 1986-01
Book Reviews: Current Issues in Toxicology. Interpretation and extrapolation of chemical and biological carcinogenicity data to establish human safety standards. The use of short-term tests for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in chemical hazard evaluation. Edited by H. C. Grice. Springer-Verlag,Berlin,1984,197pp.,DM52
Gold, L.S., Sawyer, C.B., Magaw, R., Backman, G.M., De Veciana, M., Levinson, R., Hooper, N.K., Havender, W.R., Berstein, L., Peto, R., Pike, M.C. & Ames, B.N. (1984). A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays. Env. Hlth. Perspect., 58, 9-319.
2.
McGuinness, E.E., Morgan, R.G.H. & Wormsley, K.G. (1984). Effects of soybean flour on the pancreas of rats. Env. Hlth. Perspect., 56, 205-212.
3.
Peto, R., Pike, M.C., Bernstein, L., Gold, L.S. & Ames, B.N. (1984). The TD50: A proposed general convention for the numerical description of the carcinogenic potency of chemicals in chronic-exposure animal experiments. Env. Hlth Perspect., 58, 1-8.
4.
Roe, F.J.C. (1981). Are nutritionists worried about the epidemic of tumours in laboratory animals? Proc. Nutr. Soc., 40, 57-65.
5.
Roe, F.J.C. (1983). Testing for carcinogenicity and the problem of pseudocarcinogenicity. Nature, 303, 657-658.
