At the request of the author, and with the agreement of the journal editors, the following article has been retracted and is re-published as open access in January 2022.
Zhang D, Yu F, Li H, Wang Q, Wang M, Qian H, Wu X, Wu F, Liu Y, Jiang S, Li P, Wang R, Li W (2021) AgNPs reduce reproductive capability of female mouse for their toxic effects on mouse early embryo development. Human & Experimental Toxicology 40(12S): S246–S256. DOI: 10.1177/09603271211038742
References
1.
ShahverdiARFakhimiAShahverdiHR, et al.Synthesis and effect of silver nanoparticles on the antibacterial activity of different antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Nanomedicine. 2007; 3(2):168–171.
2.
ChaloupkaKMalamYSeifalianAM. Nanosilver as a new generation of nanoproduct in biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2010; 28(11): 580–588.
3.
WangRWangRSongB, et al.Potential adverse effects of nanoparticles on the reproductive system. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018; 13: 8487–8506.
4.
HouCCZhuJQ. Nanoparticles and female reproductive system: how do nanoparticles affect oogenesis and embryonic development. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(65): 109799–109817.
5.
ElechiguerraJLBurtJLMoronesJR, et al.Interaction of silver nanoparticles with HIV-1. J Nanobiotechnol. 2005; 3: 6.
6.
LaraHHIxtepan-TurrentLGarza-TreviñoEN, et al.PVP-coated silver nanoparticles block the transmission of cell-free and cell-associated HIV-1 in human cervical culture. J Nanobiotechnol. 2010; 8: 15.
7.
AliEMAbdallahBM. Effective inhibition of candidiasis using an eco-friendly leaf extract of calotropis-gigantean-mediated silver nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(3): 422.
8.
OtaguiriESMorguetteAEBBiasi-GarbinRP, et al.Antibacterial combination of oleoresin from copaifera multijuga hayne and biogenic silver nanoparticles towards streptococcus agalactiae. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2017; 18(2): 177–190.
9.
OrłowskiPKowalczykATomaszewskaE, et al.Antiviral activity of tannic acid modified silver nanoparticles: Potential to activate immune response in herpes genitalis. Viruses. 2018; 10(10): 524.
10.
WangZLiuSMaJ, et al.Silver nanoparticles induced RNA polymerase-silver binding and RNA transcription inhibition in erythroid progenitor cells. ACS Nano. 2013; 7(5): 4171–4186.
11.
YinNLiuQLiuJ, et al.Silver nanoparticle exposure attenuates the viability of rat cerebellum granule cells through apoptosis coupled to oxidative stress. Small. 2013; 9(9–10): 1831–1841.
12.
ChenYWangZXuM, et al.Nanosilver incurs an adaptive shunt of energy metabolism mode to glycolysis in tumor and nontumor cells. ACS Nano. 2014; 8(6): 5813–5825.
13.
ZhangJChenYGaoM, et al.Silver nanoparticles compromise female embryonic stem cell differentiation through disturbing X chromosome inactivation. ACS Nano. 2019; 13(2): 2050–2061.
14.
NelAXiaTMädlerL, et al.Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science. 2006; 311(5761): 622–627.
15.
FoldbjergROlesenPHougaardM, et al.PVP-coated silver nanoparticles and silver ions induce reactive oxygen species, apoptosis and necrosis in THP-1 monocytes. Toxicol Lett. 2009; 190(2): 156–162.
16.
Mahaut-SmithMPMartinez-PinnaJGurungIS. A role for membrane potential in regulating GPCRs?Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008; 29(8): 421–429.
17.
LiuZZhangTRenG, et al.Nano-Ag inhibiting action potential independent glutamatergic synaptic transmission but increasing excitability in rat CA1 pyramidal neurons. Nanotoxicology. 2012; 6(4): 414–423.
18.
OzilJPHuneauD. Activation of rabbit oocytes: the impact of the Ca2+ signal regime on development. Development. 2001;128(6): 917–928.
19.
LawrenceYWhitakerMSwannK. Sperm-egg fusion is the prelude to the initial Ca2+ increase at fertilization in the mouse. Development. 1997; 124(1): 233–241.
20.
KajiKOdaSShikanoT, et al.The gamete fusion process is defective in eggs of Cd9-deficient mice. Nat Genet. 2000; 24(3): 279–282.
21.
JungnickelMKMarreroHBirnbaumerL, et al.Trp2 regulates entry of Ca2+ into mouse sperm triggered by egg ZP3. Nat Cell Biol. 2001; 3(5): 499–502.
22.
LawittsJABiggersJD. Guide to techniques in mouse development. Methods Enzymol, 1993; 225: 153–164.
23.
ZhangDWangQChengX, et al.A noninvasive delivery of DNA into zygotes by AuNPs-PEI for transgenic mice. ChemNanoMat. 2020; 6(5): 765–772.
24.
ZhangDPanLYangLH, et al.Strontium promotes calcium oscillations in mouse meiotic oocytes and early embryos through InsP3 receptors, and requires activation of phospholipase and the synergistic action of InsP3. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20(11): 3053–3061.
25.
ZhangDJingHDouC, et al.Supplement of betaine into embryo culture medium can rescue injury effect of ethanol on mouse embryo development. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 1761.
AdamsDSLevinM. Measuring resting membrane potential using the fluorescent voltage reporters DiBAC4(3) and CC2-DMPE. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2012; 4: 459–464.
28.
BhavsarMBCatoGHauschildA, et al.Membrane potential (Vmem) measurements during mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. Peer J. 2019; 7: e6341.
29.
TaitSWGreenDR. Mitochondria and cell death: outer membrane permeabilization and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010; 11(9): 621–632.
30.
AmigorenaSChoquetDTeillaudJL, et al.Ion channel blockers inhibit B cell activation at a precise stage of the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Possible involvement of K+ channels. J Immunol. 1990; 144(6): 2038–2045.
McLaughlinKALevinM. Bioelectric signaling in regeneration: mechanisms of ionic controls of growth and form. Dev Biol. 2018; 433(2): 177–189.
33.
PiggottBJPetersCJHeY, et al.Paralytic, the Drosophila voltage-gated sodium channel, regulates proliferation of neural progenitors. Genes Dev. 2019; 33(23–24): 1739–1750.
34.
ArcangeliACarlàMDel BeneMR, et al.Polar/apolar compounds induce leukemia cell differentiation by modulating cell-surface potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993; 90(12): 5858–5862.
35.
YangMBrackenburyWJ. Membrane potential and cancer progression. Front Physiol. 2013; 4: 185.
36.
BadingHGreenbergME. Stimulation of protein tyrosine phosphorylation by NMDA receptor activation. Science. 1991; 253(5022): 912–914.
37.
RosenLBGintyDDWeberMJ, et al.Membrane depolarization and calcium influx stimulate MEK and MAP kinase via activation of Ras. Neuron. 1994; 12(6): 1207–1221.
38.
ServiliETrusMMaayanD, et al.β-Subunit of the voltage-gated Ca2+ channel Cav1.2 drives signaling to the nucleus via H-Ras. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(37): E8624–E8633.
39.
TangTSDongJBHuangXY, et al.Ca2+ oscillations induced by a cytosolic sperm protein factor are mediated by a maternal machinery that functions only once in mammalian eggs. Development. 2000; 127(5): 1141–1150.
40.
HuQWolfnerMF. The Drosophila Trpm channel mediates calcium influx during egg activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(38): 18994–19000.
41.
WinstonNJJohnsonMHMcConnellJM, et al.Expression and role of the ether-à-go-go-related (MERG1A) potassium-channel protein during preimplantation mouse development. Biol Reprod. 2004; 70(4): 1070–1079.
42.
ParkKHChhowallaMIqbalZ, et al.Single-walled carbon nanotubes are a new class of ion channel blockers. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(50): 50212–50216.
43.
SalvesenGSDuckettCS. IAP proteins: blocking the road to death’s door. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 3(6): 401–410.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
