This article draws on the concept of ‘productivity coalitions’ to assess the micro-foundations of Danish and Irish social partnership, and the extent to which they have facilitated a sustainable, ‘high road’ national competitive strategy. It focuses on continuous training to analyse the conditions necessary for effective collaboration between employers and unions. Four key variables that underpin strong productivity coalitions are identified: non-market coordination mechanisms, union ‘embeddedness’, ideological concordance and institutional constraints. The implications are pessimistic for effective collaboration in liberal market economies.
AagaardAErikssonTWestergaard-NielsenN (2004) Wage and labor mobility in Denmark, 1980–2000. NBER Empirical Personnel Economics Workshop, Cambridge, August.
2.
BélangerJEdwardsP (2007) The conditions promoting compromise in the workplace. British Journal of Industrial Relations45(4): 713–734.
3.
CampbellJHallJ (2006) Introduction: The state of Denmark. In: CampbellJHallJPedersenOK (eds) National Identity and the Varieties of Capitalism. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 1–50.
4.
CulpepperP (2001) Employers, public policy, and the politics of decentralized cooperation in Germany and France. In: HallPSoskiceD (eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 275–306.
5.
D’ArtDTurnerT (2005) Union recognition and partnership at work: A new legitimacy for Irish trade unions?Industrial Relations Journal36(2): 121–139.
6.
DieckhoffMJunglutJO’ConnellP (2007) Job-related training in Europe: Do institutions matter? In: GallieD (ed.) Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 77–103.
7.
DobbinsAGunnigleP (2009) Can voluntary workplace partnership deliver sustainable mutual gains?British Journal of Industrial Relations47(3): 546–570.
8.
DueJMadsenJS (2008) The Danish model of industrial relations: Erosion or renewal?Journal of Industrial Relations50(3): 513–529.
9.
EggerPSengenbergerW (2003) Decent Work in Denmark: Employment, Social Efficiency and Economic Security. Geneva: ILO.
10.
EsbjergLGrunertKGBuckNSonne AndersenAM (2008) Working in Danish retailing: Transitional workers going elsewhere, core employees going nowhere, and career-seekers striving to go somewhere. In: Westergaard-NielsenN (ed.) Low-wage Work in Denmark. New York: SAGE, pp. 140–185.
11.
Expert Group on Future Skills Need (EGFSN) (2007) Tomorrow’s Skills: Towards a National Skills Strategy. Dublin: Forfas.
12.
FinegoldDSoskiceD (1988) The failure of training in Britain: Analysis and prescription. Oxford Review of Economic Policy4(3): 21–53.
13.
Forfás (2011) Statistics at a Glance 2011. Dublin: Forfás.
14.
HallPSoskiceD (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
HeeryENoonM (2008) A Dictionary of Human Resource Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
HuzzardTGregoryDScottR (eds) (2005) Strategic Unionism and Partnership: Boxing or Dancing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
High Level Group on Manufacturing (2008) The Report of the High Level Group on Manufacturing. Dublin: Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment.
18.
ITIC (2006) Irish Tourist Industry Confederation Submission on the National Development Plan 2007–2013. Dublin: ITIC.
KatzensteinP (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
KristensenP (2006) Business systems in the age of the ‘new economy’: Denmark facing the challenge. In: CampbellJHallJPedersenOK (eds) National Identity and the Varieties of Capitalism: The Danish Experience. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 295–320.
MailandM (2006) Dynamic neo-corporatism – Regulating work and welfare in Denmark. Transfer12(3): 371–387.
24.
McLaughlinC (2009) The productivity-enhancing impacts of the minimum wage: Lessons from Denmark and New Zealand. British Journal of Industrial Relations47(2): 327–348.
25.
NDP (2001) Ireland: National Development Plan 2000–2006. Dublin: Irish Government.
26.
NielsenKKestingS (2003) Small is resilient – the impact of globalisation on Denmark. Review of Social EconomyLXI(3): 365–387.
27.
O’ConnellPRussellHWatsonDByrneD (2009) The Changing Workplace: A Survey of Employees’ Views and Experiences. Dublin: National Centre for Partnership and Performance.
28.
OECD (2008) Education at a Glance 2008. Paris: OECD.
29.
ReginiM (1995) Uncertain Boundaries: The Social and Political Construction of European Economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
RhodesM (2001) The political economy of social pacts: ‘Competitive corporatism’ and European welfare reform. In: PiersonP (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165–194.
31.
RocheW (2012) ‘After the ball is over’: Accounts of the functioning and demise of social partnership. In: SheehanB (ed.) The Labour Relations Commission: Recalling 21 Years: 1991–2012. Dublin: Labour Relations Commission, pp. 133–150.
32.
RocheWTeagueP (2013) Successful but unappealing: Fifteen years of workplace partnership in Ireland. International Journal of Human Resource Management. Epub ahead of print 8March2013. DOI:10.1080/09585192.2012.756823.
StreeckW (1992) Social Institutions and Economic Performance: Studies of Industrial Relations in Advanced Capitalist Economies. London: SAGE.
35.
StreeckW (1997) Beneficial constraints: On the economic limits of rational voluntarism. In: HollingsworthJBoyerR (eds) Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–219.
36.
StreeckW (2004) Educating capitalists: A rejoinder to Wright and Tsakalotos. Socio-Economic Review2(3): 425–438.
37.
StuartM (2007) Introduction: The industrial relations of learning and training: A new consensus or a new politics?European Journal of Industrial Relations13(3): 269–280.
38.
TanseyP (2005) Productivity: Ireland’s Economic Imperative. Dublin: Microsoft Ireland.
39.
TeaguePDonagheyJ (2004) The Irish experiment in social partnership. In: KatzHLeeWLeeJ (eds) The New Structure of Labor Relations: Tripartism and Decentralization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
40.
TeaguePDonagheyJ (2009) Why has Irish social partnership survived?British Journal of Industrial Relations47(1): 55–78.
41.
VisserJ (2001) Industrial relations and social dialogue. In: AuerP (ed.) Changing Labour Markets in Europe: The Role of Institutions and Policies. Geneva: ILO, pp. 184–242.
42.
WindolfP (1989) Productivity coalitions and the future of European corporatism. Industrial Relations28(1): 1–20.
43.
WrightE (2004) Beneficial constraint: beneficial for whom?Socio-Economic Review2(3): 407–414.
