Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article develops an analytical model of how and why the political-economic context affects employers’ preferences in using collective agreements to finance and regulate pension schemes. It argues that these preferences are influenced by three domains, the labour market and industrial relations system, public policies and the financial market. The study compares and contrasts three Nordic countries, and reveals how these three mechanisms have generated distinctive trajectories of employer preferences.

Keywords

Denmark employers historical institutionalism Norway pensions preferences Sweden

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersen

(2011) 7 Denmark: The silent revolution towards a multipillar pension system. In: Ebbinghaus

(ed.) The Varieties of Pension Governance: Pension Privatization in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 183–209.

Berg

(2004) Occupational pensions and industrial relations. Contributing article: Sweden. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2004/04/study/index.htm.

Bowman

(1998) Achieving capitalist solidarity: Collective action among Norwegian employers. Politics & Society 26(3): 303–336.

Bridgen

Meyer

(2005) When do benevolent capitalists change their mind? Explaining the retrenchment of defined-benefit pensions in Britain. Social Policy & Administration 39(7): 764–785.

Brooks

(2002) Social protection and economic integration: The politics of pension reform in an era of capital mobility. Comparative Political Studies 35(5): 491–523.

DA (Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening) (2009) The Nordic labour markets and the concept of flexicurity. Available at: http://www.da.dk/bilag/05-09-14%20The%20Nordic%20labour%20markets%20and%20the%20concept%20of%20flexicurity%20%282%29.pdf.

Due

Madsen

(2007) A chance conjunction of exceptional circumstances. The introduction of the Danish labour market pensions in the 1980s. Unpublished paper.

Dølvik

Stokland

(1992) Norway: The ‘Norwegian model’ in transition. In: Ferner

Hyman

(eds) Industrial Relations in the New Europe. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 143–167.

Ebbinghaus

(ed.) (2011) The Varieties of Pension Governance: Pension Privatization in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

10.

Ebbinghaus

Wiß

(2011) Taming pension fund capitalism in Europe: Collective and state regulation in times of crisis. Transfer 17(1): 15–28.

11.

Esping-Andersen

(1996) Conclusion: Occupational welfare in the social policy nexus. In: Shalev

(ed.) The Privatization of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 327–338.

12.

Estévez-Abe

(2001) The forgotten link. The financial regulation of Japanese pension funds in comparative perspective. In: Ebbinghaus

Manow

(eds) Comparing Welfare Capitalism. London: Routledge, pp. 201–214.

13.

Falleti

Lynch

(2009) Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comparative Political Studies 42(9): 1143–1166.

14.

Flanders

(1974) Management and Unions: The Theory and Reform of Industrial Relations. London: Faber.

15.

Green-Pedersen

(2007) Denmark: A ‘World Bank’ pension system. In: Anderson

Immergut

Schulze

(eds) Handbook of West European Pension Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 454–495.

16.

Green-Pedersen

Lindbom

(2006) Politics within paths: Trajectories of Danish and Swedish earnings-related pensions. Journal European Social Policy 16(3): 245–258.

17.

Hall

(2005) Preference formation as a political process: The case of the monetary union in Europe. In: Katznelson

Weingast

(eds) Preferences and Situations. Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 129–160.

18.

Hall

Taylor

(1996) Political science and the three institutionalisms. MPIfG Discussion Paper 96/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne.

19.

Heclo

(1975) Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

20.

Hernæs

Pigott

Strøm

Zhang

(2011) Occupational pensions, tenure, and taxes. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 10(3): 435–456.

21.

Hippe

Pedersen

(1996) The labor movement, social policy and occupational welfare in Norway. In: Shalev

(ed.) The Privatization of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 187–209.

22.

Hyman

Schuller

(1984) Occupational pension schemes and collective bargaining. British Journal of Industrial Relations 22(3): 289–310.

23.

Immergut

(1997) The normative roots of the new institutionalism: Historical-institutionalism and comparative policy studies. In: Benz

Seibel

(eds) Theorieentwicklung in der Politikwissenschaft. Eine Zwischenbilanz. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, pp. 325–356.

24.

Iversen

(1996) Power, flexibility and the breakdown of centralized wage bargaining: Denmark and Sweden. Comparative Politics 28(4): 399–436.

25.

Kangas

Palme

(1989) Public and Private Pensions: The Scandinavian Countries in a Comparative Perspective. Stockholm: Institutet för social forsking.

26.

Kangas

Palme

(1996) The development of occupational pensions in Finland and Sweden: Class politics and institutional feedbacks. In: Shalev

(ed.) The Privatization of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 211–240.

27.

Kangas

Lundberg

Ploug

(2006) Three Routes to a Pension Reform. Politics and Institutions in Reforming Pensions in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. Arbetsrapport 2006/10. Stockholm: Institutet för Framtidsstudier.

28.

Korpi

(1983) The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge.

29.

Lindquist

Wadensjö

(2011) Sweden: A viable public-private pension system. In: Ebbinghaus

(ed.) The Varieties of Pension Governance: Pension Privatization in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 240–291.

30.

Lismoen

(2001) Progressive retirement in Europe. Contributing article: Norway. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2001/09/study/index.htm.

31.

Lismoen

(2002) Private sector bargaining produces significant wage increases. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2002/04/feature/no0204103f.htm.

32.

LO (Landsorganisasjonen i Norge) (2009) LO’s programme of action. Available at: http://www.lo.no/language/English/Documents/LOs-Programme-og-Action/?t=1735#1.

33.

Myles

Pierson

(2001) The comparative political economy of pension reform. In: Pierson

(ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 305–333.

34.

Nergaard

(2001) LO wants occupational pensions on bargaining agenda. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2001/03/feature/no0103125f.htm.

35.

Nergaard

(2004a) 2004 bargaining round progresses. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2004/04/feature/no0404102f.htm.

36.

Nergaard

(2004b) Occupational pensions and industrial relations. Country report Norway. Eironline. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2004/04/study/index.htm.

37.

Nergaard

(2004c) Agreement reached in manufacturing industry. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2004/04/inbrief/no0404101n.htm.

38.

Nergaard

(2004d) Controversial pension reform proposed. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2004/02/feature/no0402101f.htm.

39.

Nergaard

(2007) Pension reform in favour of longer time in employment. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2006/11/articles/no0611019i.htm.

40.

Nergaard

(2008) Social partners agree on wage rise and early retirement conditions. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2008/04/articles/no0804039i.htm.

41.

Nergaard

(2010) Norway – Developments on social partner organisations: Employer organisations. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/studies/tn0910049s/no0910049q.htm.

42.

NHO (Næringslivets Hovedorganisasjon) (2003) Strategy for the NHO Community 2004–2013. Available at: http://www.nho.no/getfile.php/bilder/RootNY/filer_og_vedlegg1/Strategy%20for%20NHO.pdf.

43.

Nordheim Nielsen

(1986) Occupational pensions in Northern Europe: A comparative study of factors in and effects of the growth of occupational pension systems in Britain, Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands and West Germany. Working Paper Report 1, Københavns universitet, Copenhagen.

44.

Nordheim Nielsen

(1996) Danish occupational pensions in the 1980s: From social security to political economy. In: Shalev

(ed.) The Privatization of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 159–186.

45.

øverbye

(1996) Public and occupational pensions in the Nordic countries. In: Shalev

(ed.) The Privatization of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 159–186.

46.

øverbye

(1998) The politics of voluntary and mandatory pensions in the Nordic countries. Labour 12(1): 169–189.

47.

Pedersen

(2000) The Coverage with Occupational Pensions in Norway. Results from a Survey of Private Sector Companies. Oslo: Fafo.

48.

Pontusson

(1992) The Limits of Social Democracy. Investment Politics in Sweden. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

49.

Rein

Turner

(2001) Public–private interactions: Mandatory pensions in Australia, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Review of Population and Social Policy 10: 107–153.

50.

Shalev

(1996) (ed.) The Privatization of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

51.

Sisson

(1987) The Management of Collective Bargaining: An International Comparison. Oxford: Blackwell.

52.

Skocpol

Somers

(1980) The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22(2): 174–197.

53.

Swenson

(2002) Capitalists against Markets. The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

54.

Swenson

Pontusson

(2000) The Swedish employer offensive against centralized wage bargaining. In: Iversen

Pontusson

Soskice

(eds) Unions, Employers and Central Banks. Macroeconomic Coordination and Institutional Change in Social Market Economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 77–106.

55.

Trampusch

(2007) Industrial relations as a source of solidarity in times of welfare state retrenchment. Journal of Social Policy 36(2): 197–215.

56.

Trampusch

. (eds) (2010) Country Reports on Pensions. REBECA (Research on Social Benefits in Collective Agreements). Database, Part 2 ‘Social Benefits in Collective Agreements’. University of Berne Institute of Political Science.

57.

Wadensjö

(1997) The welfare mix in pension provisions in Sweden. In: Rein

Wadensjö

(eds) Enterprise and the Welfare State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 266–308.

58.

Wildavsky

(1987) Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: A cultural theory of preference formation. American Political Science Review 81(1): 3–22.

59.

Woll

(2005) Learning to act on world trade. Preference formation of large firms in the United States and the European Union. MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/1, Cologne.

Employers and collectively negotiated occupational pensions in Sweden,Denmark and Norway: Promoters,vacillators and adversaries

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References