How do government employers exercise power in highly voluntarist bargaining models? In this article, we analyse the potential power of public employers in Sweden, Denmark and Norway and examine how they use this potential. We call attention to three areas in which government employers exercise power: direct political intervention, attempts to decentralize wage bargaining and control of wage movements. We argue that government employers in the three countries have similar institutional capacities for power, but their ways of exercising power vary according to political norms and practice.
Arbeids- og administrasjonsdepartementet (1990) Statens lønnskomité av 1988. Oslo: NOU, p. 32.
2.
BachS (2002) Public-sector employment relations reform under labour: Muddling through or modernization?British Journal of Industrial Relations40(2): 319–339.
3.
BachSBordognaL (2013) Reframing public service employment relations: The impact of economic crisis and the new EU economic governance. European Journal of Industrial Relations19(4): 279–294.
4.
BachSKesslerI (2011) The citizen-consumer as industrial relations actor: New ways of working and the end-user in social sare. British Journal of Industrial Relations49(1): 80–102.
5.
BeaumontPB (1992) Public Sector Industrial Relations. London: Routledge.
6.
BordognaL (2008) Moral hazard, transaction costs and the reform of public service employment relations. European Journal of Industrial Relations14(4): 381–400.
7.
CleggHA (1976) Trade Unionism under Collective Bargaining: A Theory based on Comparisons of Six Countries. Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
Deloitte (2015) Gjennomgang av den statlige arbeidsgiverfunksjonen: Rapport til Kommunal- og moderninsringsdepartementet. Oslo: Kommunal- og moderninsringsdepartementet.
9.
DueJMadsenJS (1996) Forligsmagerne. Copenhagen: Jurist og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
DueJMadsenJS (2009) Forligsmagere og Forumshoppere: Analyse af OK08 i den offentlige sektor. Copenhagen: Jurist og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
12.
DueJMadsenJS (2015) Fra tjenestemænd til overenskomstansatte: En historisk analyse af konfliktformer i det offentlige aftalesystem. Økonomi og Politik4(88): 64–75.
13.
EdwardsP (2006) Power and ideology in the workplace: Going beyond even the second version of the three-dimensional view. Work, Employment and Society20(3): 571–581.
14.
ElvanderN (2002a) The new Swedish regime for collective bargaining and conflict resolution: A comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations8(2): 197–216.
15.
ElvanderN (2002b) The labor market regimes in the Nordic countries: A comparative analysis. Scandinavian Political Studies25(2): 117–138.
16.
ElvanderN (2004) Från plan till marknad: Statlig lönebildning 1989–2003. Ekonomisk Debatt32(1): 5–21.
17.
FernerA (1994) The state as employer. In: HymanRAnthonyF (eds) New Frontiers in European Industrial Relations. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 52–79.
18.
Finansdepartementet (2013) Lønnsdannelsen og utfordringer for norsk økonomi. Oslo: NOU, p. 13.
19.
FlandersA (1970) Management and Unions. London: Faber & Faber.
20.
GreerISchultenTBöhlkeN (2013) How does market making affect industrial relations? Evidence from eight German hospitals. British Journal of Industrial Relations51(2): 215–239.
21.
GullstrandD (2014) Det starka industriavtalet: Industrins perspektiv på industriavtalet och industrinormen. Lund: Magisteruppsats Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Lunds universitet.
HansenNW (2012) Lokal løn i det offentlige. Copenhagen: FAOS.
24.
HansenNW (2015) De statslige arbejdsgivere i Danmark og Sverige og deres magt. Økonomi og Politik88(4): 76–87.
25.
HansenNWMailandM (2013) Public service employment relations in an era of austerity: The case of Denmark. European Journal of Industrial Relations19(4): 375–389.
26.
HansenNWMailandM (2015) Vindstød uden stormstyrke: Overenskomstfornyelsen 2015 i den offentlige sektor. FAOS Forskningsnotat 145, April2015. Copenhagen: FAOS.
27.
HøgedahlLIbsenF (2015) Konfliktrettens anvendelighed i den offentlige sektor set i lyset af OK13. Økonomi og Politik4(88): 34–50.
28.
IbsenCL (2015) Three approaches to coordinated bargaining: A case for power-based explanations. European Journal of Industrial Relations21(1): 39–56.
29.
IbsenCLLarsenTPMadsenJS (2011) Challenging Scandinavian employment relations: The effects of new public management reform. International Journal of Human Resource Management22(11): 2295–2310.
30.
JacobsenKPedersenD (2010) Kampen om den danske model: Da SOSU’erne rystede det etablerede system. Copenhagen: Informations Forlag.
JordfaldBStokkeTA (2006) Lønnsdannelsen i staten. Mulige utviklingsbaner. Fafo rapport 513. Oslo: Fafo.
33.
Justitiedepartementet (2002) Den arbetsgivarpolitiska delegeringen i staten: En samlad utvärdering. Stockholm: SOU, p. 32.
34.
KellerBDueJAndersenSK (2001) Employer associations and unions in the public sector. In: Dell’AringaCDella RoccaGKellerB (eds) Strategic Choices in Reforming Public Service Employment: An International Handbook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 71–96.
35.
KellyJ (2011) Theories of collective action and union power. In: GallGWilkinssonAHurdR (eds) International Handbook of Labour Unions: Reponses to Neo-Liberalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 13–28.
36.
KjellbergA (2011) Storkonflikten 1980 och andra stora arbetskonflikter i Sverige. Arbetahistoria2–3: 33–40.
37.
Kommunal- og forvaltningskomiteen (2015–2016) Innstilling til Stortinget fra kommunal- og forvaltningskomiteen. Oslo: Stortinget.
38.
MailandM (2015) Lærerkonflikten under OK2013: Fra forberedelse til lovindgreb og perspektiver. Økonomi og Politik88(4): 22–33.
39.
MailandM (2016) Proactive employers and teacher’s working time regulation: Public sector industrial conflicts in Denmark and Norway. Economic and Industrial Democracy. Epub ahead of print 2August2016. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X16657414.
40.
MailandMHansenNW (2016) The impact of public service reforms and economic crisis on employment relations in Denmark and Sweden. In: BachSBordognaL (eds) Public Service Management and Employment Relations in Europe: Emerging from the Crisis?London: Routledge, pp. 218–243.
41.
Medlingsinstitutet (2014) Avtalsrörelsen och lönebildningen. Stockholm: Medlingsinstitutet.
42.
Moderniseringsstyrelsen (2015) Strategi og mål. Copenhagen: Moderniseringsstyrelsen.
43.
MolinaO (2014) Self-regulation and the state in industrial relations in Southern Europe: Back to the future?European Journal of Industrial Relations20(1): 21–36.
44.
NergaardKAlsosKSeipÅA (2016) Koordineringen av lønnsdannelsen innen de nordiske frontfagsmodellene. Oslo: Fafo-notat, p. 25.
45.
NielsenKPedersenOK (1989) Forhandlingsøkonomi i Norden. Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
46.
ÖbergADÖbergT (2015) Ledartröja eller tvångströya? Den svenska lönebildningens ansikten eller berättelsen om hur vi hamnade här. Stockholm: Premiss förlag.
SeipÅA (1998) Rett til å forhandle: En studie i statstjenestemennenes forhandlingsrett i Norge og Sverige 1910 – 1965. Oslo: Fafo.
49.
SeipÅA (2002) Lokale lønnsforhandlinger i Staten: Lønn som personalpolitisk verktøy. Fafo rapport 397. Oslo: Fafo.
50.
SeipÅA (2012–2016) Bakgrunnen for lønnsoppgjøret. Available at: www.arbeidslivet.no
51.
SeipÅA (2013) Bruk av tvungen lønnsnemnd i Norge 1990–2012 (Fafo rapport). Oslo: Fafo, p. 55.
52.
StokkeTASeipÅA (2003) Lokal lønnsdannelse og tvistelønsing: Erfaringer fra nordeuropeiske land. Fafo rapport 422. Oslo: Fafo.
53.
StokkeTASeipÅA (2008) Collective dispute resolution in the public sector: The Nordic countries compared. Journal of Industrial Relations50(4): 560–577.
54.
StokkeTANergaardKEvjuS (2013) Det kollektive arbeidslivet: Organiasjoner, tariffavtaler og lønnsoppgjør. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
55.
ThörnqvistC (2007) Changing industrial relations in the Swedish public sector: New tensions within the old framework of corporatism. International Journal of Public Sector Management20(1): 16–33.
56.
TranøyBSØsterudØ (eds) (2001) Den fragmenterte staten: Reformer, makt og styring. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
57.
WiseLR (1993) Whither solidarity? Transitions in Swedish public-sector pay policy. British Journal of Industrial Relations31(1): 74–95.
