A significant number of articles published in Theory & Psychology have been inspired by, or discuss, Vygotsky’s contribution to psychology. However, most of the available publications and discussions on Vygotsky overlook his theory of art and emotions and, more broadly, his view on subjectivity. In this article we offer a reading of Vygotsky’s The Psychology of Art. According to our interpretation, art is conceived in this theory as a social technique for (re)constructing life and transforming bodies; human emotions are dialogical processes, culturally and semiotically created, and historically transformed. Our theoretical perspective differs from some other interpretations of Vygotsky’s work because of its emphasis on the centrality of emotions in psychological life, and particularly on the intertwining of sociogenesis and microgenesis. Through emotions, discourse practices and cultural techniques have transformative effects on bodily reorganization (catharsis) and subjective experience (perezhivanie). This is discussed in relation to the political implications of a theory of emotions and its relevance for the theorization of subjectivity.
AkhutinaT. V. (2003). The theory of verbal communication in the works of M. M. Bakhtin and L. S. Vygotsky. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 41(3–4), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-040541030496
2.
BakhtinM. (1981). The discourse in the novel. In The dialogical imagination (EmersonC.HolquistM., Trans.; pp. 259–422). University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1934–1935)
3.
BakhtinM. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In Speech genres and other late essays (McGeeV. W., Trans.; pp. 60–101). University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1952–1953)
4.
BakhtinM. (1990a). Author and hero in aesthetic activity. In HolquistM.LiapunovV. (Eds.), Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays (LiapunovV.BrostromK., Trans.; pp. 4–256). University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1920–1923)
5.
BakhtinM. (1990b). Supplement: The problem of content, material and form in verbal art. In HolquistM.LiapunovV. (Eds.), Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays (LiapunovV.BrostromK., Trans.; pp. 310–379). University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1924)
6.
BandlamudiL. (2015). Difference, dialogue & development: A Bakhtinian world. Routledge.
7.
BertauM. C. (2011). Language for the other: Constructing cultural-historical psycholinguistics. Tätigkeitstheorie: E-Journal for Activity Theoretical Research in Germany, 5, 13–49.
BilligM. (2008). The hidden roots of critical psychology: Understanding the impact of Locke, Shaftesbury and Reid. SAGE.
10.
BrandistC. (2007). The Vygotsky and Bakhtin circles: Explaining the convergence. In AlanenR.PöyhönenS. (Eds.), Language in action: Vygotsky and Leontievian legacy today (pp. 79–100). Cambridge Scholars.
11.
CloughP. T. (2008). The affective turn: Political economy, biomedia and bodies. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407085156
12.
CornejoC. (2012). Contrasting Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s approaches to consciousness. Culture & Psychology, 18(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x11427470
del RíoP.ÁlvarezA. (2007). De la psicología del drama al drama de la psicología: La relación entre la vida y la obra de Lev S. Vygotski. [From the psychology of drama to the drama of psychology: The relationship between the life and work of Lev S. Vygotsky]. Estudios de Psicología, 28(3), 303–332. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093907782506489
15.
DeweyJ. (1934). Art as experience. Perigee Books.
16.
de ZárateA. O. (1997). La psicología del arte de Vygotsky: los límites de la psicología cognitiva. [Vygotsky’s psychology of art: The limits of cognitive psychology]. Trama y Fondo: Revista de Cultura, 3, 27–43.
17.
González ReyF. (2016). Vygotsky’s concept of perezhivanie in the psychology of art and at the final moment of his work: Advancing his legacy. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1186196
18.
González ReyF. (2018). Vygotsky’s “The Psychology of Art”: A foundational and still unexplored text. Revista Estudios de Psicología (Campinas), 35(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000400002
19.
HayeA. (2008). Living being and speaking being: Towards a dialogical approach to intentionality. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 42(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9051-6
20.
HayeA.LarrainA. (2011). What is an utterance? In MärtsinM.WagonerB.AvelingE.KadianakiI.WhittakerL. (Eds.), Dialogicality in focus: Challenges to theory, method and application (pp. 33–52). Nova Science.
21.
HolodynskiM.SeegerF. (2013). Current and impending issues in cultural–historical studies on emotions: A follow-up. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(3), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2013.807207
22.
KhinkaninaA. (2014). The historic importance of L. S. Vygotsky’s The Psychology of Art and some problems of modern psychological and pedagogical field. International Journal of Psychological Research, 7(2), 85–91.
23.
KozulinA. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology: Vygotsky, his disciples and critics. American Psychologist, 41(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.3.264
LeontievD. A. (1971). Introduction. In L. S. Vygotsky, The psychology of art (Scripta Technica, Trans.; pp. v–xi). MIT Press. (Original work published 1925)
28.
LimaM. G. (1995). From aesthetics to psychology: Notes on Vygotsky’s psychology of art. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(4), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1995.26.4.05x1061u
MarkováI. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge University Press.
31.
MarkováI. (2008). The epistemological significance of the theory of social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 461–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00382.x
32.
MatusovE. (2011). Irreconcilable differences in Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s approaches to the social and the individual: An educational perspective. Culture & Psychology, 17(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x1038884
33.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a behaviorist. The University of Chicago Press.
34.
MezquitaG. R. (2012). Vygotsky and the theories of emotions: In search of a possible dialogue. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(4), 809–816. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722012000400021
SimondonG. (1994). L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information [Individuation in the light of the notions of form and information]. Éditions Jérôme Millon. (Original work published 1956)
37.
SmagorinskyP. (2011). Vygotsky’s stage theory: The psychology of art and the actor under the direction of Perezhivanie. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18(4), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2010.518300
38.
StetsenkoA.ArievitchI. (1997). Constructing and deconstructing the self: Comparing post-Vygotskian and discourse-based versions of social constructivism. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0403_3
SullivanP.McCarthyJ. (2009). An experiential account of the psychology of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014292
41.
ToassaG. (2009). Emotions and experiences in Vygotsky: Research for a historical–cultural perspective [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
42.
ValsinerJ. (1991). Literature and art. In van der VeerR.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for Synthesis (pp. 19–35). Blackwell.
43.
Van der VeerR.ValsinerJ. (Eds.). (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Blackwell.
44.
VološinovV. N. (1976). Discourse in life and discourse in art. In TitunikI. N.BrussN. H. (Trans.), Freudianism: A critical sketch (pp. 93–116). Academic Press. (Original work published 1926)
45.
VygotskyL. S. (1971). The psychology of art (Scripta Technica, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1925)
46.
VygotskyL. S. (1987). Thinking and speech (MinickN., Trans.). In RieberR. W.CartonA. S. (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1 (pp. 39–285). Plenum Press. (Original work published 1934)
47.
VygotskyL. S. (1997). On psychological systems (Van der VeerR., Trans.). In RieberR. W.WollockJ. (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology (pp. 91–108). Plenum Press. (Original work published 1930)
48.
VygotskyL. S. (1999a). The teaching about emotion: Historical–Psychological studies. In RieberR. W. (Ed.) & HallM. J. (Trans.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 6. Scientific legacy (pp. 71–235). Kluwer Academic. (Original work published 1984)
49.
VygotskyL. S. (1999b). On the problem of the psychology of the actor’s creative work (R. Van der Veer, Trans.). In RieberR. W. (Ed.) & HallM. J. (Trans.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 6. Scientific legacy (pp. 237–244). Kluwer Academic. (Original work published 1936)
50.
WegerifR. (2008). Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue. British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701532228
51.
WertschJ. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.
52.
YasnitskyA. (2015). A transnational history of “the beginning of a beautiful friendship”: The birth of the cultural historical Gestalt psychology of Alexander Luria, Kurt Lewin, Lev Vygotsky and others. In YasnitskyA.Van Der VeerR. (Eds.), Revisionist revolution in Vygotsky studies (pp. 201–226). Routledge.
