Nice work if you can get it: Labour market pathways of Belgian service voucher workers

Abstract

Seen as an alternative to precarious, informal work or no job at all, several European countries have started to use tax money to boost the demand for domestic services. This article asks whether this makes sense. We consider the case of the heavily subsidized and highly popular service voucher scheme in Belgium. Close to a quarter of households there employ domestic service workers under the scheme, making it in relative terms the largest scheme of its kind in Europe. The workers employed under the scheme enjoy extensive labour and social security rights. Does the service voucher scheme provide a model to be followed if we care about labour market exclusion and precariousness or is this a case of institutionalized second-tier work? To that end we trace workers’ labour market pathways over a considerable length of time. We find that a substantial share of women find a way out of vulnerable labour market situations through the scheme. However, a very significant number enter from steady employment. This is clearly at odds with the original objective of offering a stepping stone to women with a precarious labour market position. The scheme also plays an ambivalent role in the labour market integration process of immigrant newcomers. At least in part, the Belgian scheme can be seen as a case of policy overshooting. We suggest some potential improvements.

Keywords

Belgium service voucher precariousness subsidized employment women sequence analysis domestic service

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrantes

(2014) ‘I know it sounds nasty and stereotyped’: searching for the competent domestic worker. Gender, Work and Organisation 21(5): 427–442.

Altman

Pannell

(2012) Policy gaps and theory gaps: women and migrant domestic labor. Feminist Economics 18(2): 291–315.

Anderson

(2000) Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. London: Zed Books.

Autor

Levy

Murnane

(2003) The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(4): 1279–1333.

Barbiano di Belgiojoso

Ortensi

(2019) Satisfied after all? Working trajectories and job satisfaction of foreign-born female domestic and care workers in Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45(13): 2527–2550.

Bettio

Simonazzi

Villa

(2006) Changing care regimes and female migration. Journal of European Social Policy 16(3): 271–285.

Cancedda

(2001) Employment in Household Services. Dublin: The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

Carbonnier

Morel

(2015) The Political Economy of Household Services in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Esping-Andersen

(1999) Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

10.

Farris

(2018) The business of care: private placement agencies and female migrant workers in London. Gender, Work and Organization 27: 1450–1467.

11.

Gavanas

(2010) Who Cleans the Welfare State? Migration, Informalization, Social Exclusion and Domestic Services in Stockholm. Institute for Futures Studies Research Report 2010/3. Stockholm: Institute for Futures Studies.

12.

Goos

(2013) How the World of Work is Changing: A Review of the Evidence. Geneva: International Labour Office.

13.

Goos

Manning

(2007) Lousy and lovely jobs: the rising polarization of work in Britain. The Review of Economics and Statistics 89(1): 118–133.

14.

Halpin

(2014) Three narratives of sequence analysis. In: Blanchard

Bühlmann

Gauthier

(eds) Advances in Sequence Analysis: Theory, Method, Applications. Berlin: Springer.

15.

Hellgren

(2015) Markets, regimes, and the role of stakeholders: explaining precariousness of migrant domestic/careworkers in different institutional frameworks. Social Politics 22(2): 220–241.

16.

Howell

Kalleberg

(2019) Declining job quality in the United States: explanations and evidence. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of Social Sciences 5(4): 1–53.

17.

Jaehrling

Weinkopf

(2018) Job Quality and Industrial Relations in the Personal and Household Services Sector, Country Report: Germany. Duisburg: University of Duisburg-Essen.

18.

Jokela

(2017) The role of domestic employment policies in shaping precarious work. Social Policy & Administration 51(2): 286–307.

19.

Jokela

(2019) Patters of precarious employment in a female-dominated sectors in five welfare states: the case of paid domestic labor sector. Social Politics 26(1): 30–58.

20.

Kalleberg

(2018) Job insecurity and well-being in rich democracies. The Economic and Social Review 49(3): 241–258.

21.

Kilkey

Lutz

Palenga-Möllenbeck

(2010) Introduction. Domestic and care work at the intersection of welfare, gender and migration regimes: some European experiences. Social Policy & Society 9(3): 379–384.

22.

Leduc

Tojerow

(2020) Subsidising Domestic Services as a Tool to Fight Unemployment: Effectiveness and Hidden Costs. IZA Discussion Paper No. 13544. Bonn: IZA.

23.

Leschke

(2015) Non-standard employment of women in service sector occupations: a comparison of European countries. In: Eichhorst

Marx

(eds) Non-Standard Employment in Post-Industrial Labour Markets: An Occupational Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

24.

Lesnard

(2010) Setting cost in optimal matching to uncover contemporaneous socio-temporal patterns. Sociological Methods & Research 38(3): 389–419.

25.

Lutz

(2008) Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme. London: Routledge.

26.

Marx

Vandelannoote

(2015) Matthew runs amok: the Belgian service voucher scheme. In: Carbonnier

Morel

(eds) The Political Economy of Household Services in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

27.

Michielsen

(2018) Can the introduction of a third party improve the quality of work for migrant domestic workers? The case of the service voucher system in Belgium. In: Timmerman

Clycq

Levrau

, et al. (eds) Migration and Integration in Flanders. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

28.

Morel

(2015) Servants for the knowledge-based economy? The political economy of domestic services in Europe. Social Politics 22(2): 170–192.

29.

Mousaid

Huegaerts

Bosmans

, et al. (2017) The quality of work in the Belgian service voucher system. International Journal of Health Services 47(1): 40–60.

30.

OECD/European Union (2018) Settling in 2018: Indicators of Immigrant Integration. Paris/European Union, Brussels: OECD Publishing.

31.

OECD (2020) The Future for Low-Educated Workers in Belgium. Paris: OECD Publishing.

32.

OECD (2021) Bringing Household Services Out of the Shadows: Formalising Non-Care Work in and Around the House. Paris: OECD Publishing.

33.

Palier

(2019) Work, social protection and the middle classes: what future in the digital age? International Social Security Review 72(3): 113–133.

34.

Prosser

(2015) Dualization or liberalisation? Investigating precarious work in eight European countries. Work, Employment and Society 30(6): 949–965.

35.

Ramos Martín

(2018) Job Quality and Industrial Relations in the Personal and Household Services Sector, Country Report: Belgium. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.

36.

Raz-Yurovich

Marx

(2018) What does state-subsidised outsourcing of domestic work do for women’s employment? The Belgian service voucher scheme. Journal of European Social Policy 28(2): 104–115.

37.

Raz-Yurovich

Marx

(2019) Outsourcing housework and highly skilled women’s labour force participation: an analysis of a policy intervention. European Sociological Review 35(2): 205–224.

38.

Rickne

(2021) Who cleans my house if the government pays? Refugees, low-educated workers, and long-term unemployed in tax-subsidised domestic service firms, IZA Journal of Labor Policy 11(1).

39.

Romero

(1992), Maid in the USA. London: Routledge.

40.

Shire

(2015) Family supports and insecure work: the politics of household service employment in conservative welfare regimes. Social Politics 22(2): 193–219.

41.

Van Hoof

Nyssen

Kanobana

(2020) If they could, they would put them on a drip with Dutch: language learning and the professional integration of migrants in Flanders. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2020(264): 73–94.

42.

Van Hooren

(2018) Intersecting social divisions and the politics of differentiation: understanding exclusionary domestic work policy in the Netherlands. Social Politics 25(1): 92–117.

43.

Van Walsum

(2011) Regulating migrant domestic work in the Netherlands: opportunities and pitfalls. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 23(1): 141–165.

44.

Vosko

MacDonald

Campbell

(2009) Gender and the Contours of Precarious Employment. New York: Routledge.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.60 MB