In France, the Chèque Emploi-Service Universel is the current policy tool with which the state subsidizes and supports the use of paid domestic services by households. Evaluations of this scheme and of its forerunners, the Chèque Emploi-Service and the Titre Emploi-Service, have been very positive both within France and at European Union level. This article questions this conclusion by assessing the extent to which the state-supported outsourcing of women's unpaid domestic labour helps to reduce the work—life conflict and time famine which they face. It demonstrates that the impact of these schemes is marginal both in terms of the range of households which benefit from them and in terms of the amount of relief gained by the women who purchase paid domestic services. Indeed, such schemes are shown to exacerbate the problem of the unequal gender division of domestic labour. This is because they reinforce the gender stereotyping surrounding domestic work by transferring it from more well-off to less well-off women. Consequently, the question of the redistribution of domestic tasks between men and women is side-stepped.
Adjerad, S. (2005) `Le secteur des emplois familiaux en 2003: la croissance de l'activité se poursuit', Premières Informations12 (4): 1—6.
2.
Adjerad, S. (2003) `Dynamisme du secteur des emplois familiaux en 2002', Premieres Informations, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1—4.
3.
Bailly, J-P. (1996) Le développement des services de proximité. Paris: Conseil Economique et Social.
4.
Bickham Mendez, J. (1998) `Of Mops and Maids: Contradictions and Continuities in Bureaucratised Domestic Work', Social Problems45 (1): 114—35.
5.
Bihr, A. and Pfefferkorn, R. (2001) Recherches et Prévisions de la Caisse Nationale d'allocations familiales. Paris: CNAF.
6.
Bittman, M., Matheson, G. and Meagher, G. (1999) `The Changing Boundary between Home and Market: Australian Trends in Outsourcing Domestic Labour', Work, Employment and Society13 (2): 249—73.
7.
Chabaud, D., Fougeyrollas. D. and Sonnthax, A. (1985) Espace et temps du travail domestique. Paris: Meridiens.
8.
Chadeau, A. and Fouquet, A. (1981) `Peut-on mesurer le travail domestique?', Economie et Statistique136: 132—56.
9.
Coser, L. (1973) `Servants: the Obsolescence of an Occupational Role', Social Forces52 (1): 31—40.
10.
Crompton, R. and Lyonette, C. (forthcoming2007) `Work—Life Balance in Europe', Acta Sociologica.
11.
Crompton, R. and Lyonette, C. (forthcoming 2007) `Occupational Class, Country and the Domestic Division of Labour', in R. Crompton , S. Lewis and C. Lyonette (eds) Men, Women, Work and Family in Europe . Basingstoke: Palgrave.
12.
Degenne, A., Lebeaux, M-O. and Marry, C. (2002) `Les usages du temps: cumuls d'activités et rythmes de vie', Economie et Statistique, 352—353: 81—99.
13.
Dumontier, F. and Pan Ké Shon, J-L. (1999) `En 13 ans, moins de temps contrainy et plus de loisirs', INSEE Premiére, no. 675.
14.
Dussuet, A. (2005) Travaux de femmes: enquête sur les services à domicile . Paris: L'Harmattan.
15.
Ehrenreich, B. and Hochschild, A.R. (2003) Global Woman. London: Granta Books.
16.
Fagan, C. (2002) `How Many Hours? Work-time Regimes and Preferences in European Countries', in G. Crow and S. Heath (eds) Social Conceptions of Time: Structure and Process in Work and Everyday Life. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
17.
Fagnani, J. (1998) `Helping Mothers to Combine Paid and Unpaid Work — or Fighting Unemployment? The Ambiguities of French Family Policy', Community, Work and Family1 (3): 297—311.
18.
Fagnani, J. (2001) `L'intégration progressive du modèle de la “mère qui travaille”. Trente ans de politique familiale en France', Spirale18(2): 1—14.
19.
Fagnani, J. (2004) `Work and Family Life Balance: the Impact of the 35-hour Laws in France', Work, Employment and Society18 (3): 551—72.
20.
Finger, D. (1997) Service Cheques in Europe: a Model for Germany?Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum.
21.
Flipo, A. and Olier, L. (1996) `Faut-il subventionner les services à domicile? ', Economie et Statistique316—17: 3—15.
22.
Folbre, N. and Nelson, J.A. (2000) `For Love or Money — or Both?' Journal of Economic Perspectives14 (4): 123—40.
23.
Franco, A. and Winqvist, K. (2002) `Les hommes et les femmes concilient travail et vie familiale', Statistiques en bref, Eurostat, Thème3, 9/2002.
24.
Fraser, N. (1994) `After the Family Wage: Gender Equity and the Welfare State', paper presented at Crossing Borders conference (May), Stockholm.
25.
Gershuny, J., Godwin, M. and Jones, S. (1994) `The Domestic Labour Revolution: a Process of Lagged Adaptation', in M. Anderson , F. Bechofer and J. Gershuny (eds) The Social and Political Economy of the Household. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
Gorz, A. (1988) Métamorphoses du Travail — Quête du sens . Paris: Galilée.
27.
Gregson, N. and Lowe, M. (1994) Servicing the Middle Classes: Gender and Waged Domestic Labour in Contemporary Britain. London: Routledge.
28.
Haicault, M. (1984) `La gestion ordinaire de la vie en deux', Sociologie du Travail3: 268—77.
29.
Hantrais, L. (1990) Managing Professional and Family Life. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
30.
Hantrais, L. (1993) `Women, Work and Welfare in France', in J. Lewis (ed.) Women and Social Policies in Europe. Aldershot: Edward Elgar .
31.
Hochschild, A. (1997) The Time Bind. New York: Metropolitan Books.
32.
IFOP (Institut français d'opinion publique) ( 2006) La réaction des Français à la mise en place du CESU. IFOP: Paris.
33.
INSEE (Institut National des Statistiques et des Etudes Economiques) (2006) `Enquête sur l'emploi 2004 — le chômage augment légèrement malgré la reprise de l'emploi', Insee Première 1009. Paris: La Documentation Française .
34.
Jenson, J. (1986) `Gender and Reproduction: or, Babies and the State ', Studies in Political Economy20: 9—45.
35.
Jenson, J. (1990) `Labour Market and Family Policy in France: an Intersecting Complex for Dealing with Poverty', in G. Goldberg and E. Kremen (eds) The Feminization of Poverty Only in America?Westport, CT: Greenwood.
36.
Kaufmann, J-C. (ed.) (1996) Faire ou faire faire? Famille et services. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
37.
Labruyère, C. (1996) `Professionaliser les emplois familiaux', CEREQ Bref, 125.
38.
Lallement, M. (1996) `Travail domestique, partage du temps et nouveaux services', in J-C. Kaufmann (ed.) Faire ou faire faire? Famille et services. Rennes : Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
39.
Lefeuvre, N. (2000a) `Employment, Family and Community Activities: a New Balance for Men and Women', Summary of the French National Report. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union.
40.
Lefeuvre, N. (2000b) Emploi, famille et citoyenneté: un nouvel équilibre pour les hommes et les femmes. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
41.
Lewis, J. (1992) Welfare States and Working Mothers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Majnoni d'Igtinano, B. (1999) Egalité entre hommes et femmes: aspects économiques . Paris: La Documentation Française .
43.
Méda, D. (2001) Le temps des femmes. Pour un nouveau partage des roles. Paris: Flammarion.
44.
Nicole-Drancourt, C. (1989) `Stratégies professionnelles et organisation des familles', Revue française de sociologie30 (1): 57—80.
45.
Roehling, P.V., Moen, P. and Batt, R. (2003) `Spillover', in P. Moen (ed.) It's about Time: Couples and Careers. Ithaca, NY and London: ILR Press.
46.
Wajcman, J. (1998) Managing Like a Man. Women and Men in Corporate Management. Cambridge: Polity Press .
47.
Warren, T. (2003) `Class- and Gender-based Working Time? Time Poverty and the Division of Domestic Labour', Sociology37 (4): 733—52.
48.
Windebank, J. (1999) `Political Motherhood and the Social Construction of Mothering: a Franco-British comparison', Journal of Social Policy28 (1): 1—25.
49.
Windebank, J. (2001) `Dual-earner Couples in Britain and France: Gender Divisions of Domestic Labour and Parenting Work in Different Welfare States ', Work, Employment and Society15 (2): 269—90.
50.
Windebank, J. (2004) `Demand-side Incentives to Combat the Underground Economy: Some Lessons from France and Belgium', International Journal of Economic Development6 (2): 54—75.
