This article examines the nexus of globalization, welfare systems and income inequality, in which a key theme is the assessment of how the distributional consequences of globalization are altered by the welfare benefit programmes of advanced welfare states. Existing literature contends that globalization is one of the principle reasons for the current increases in income inequality in developed economies. However, the distributional effects of globalization can vary across disparate national contexts. The study investigates whether welfare systems successfully compensate those who are displaced by external competition while reducing the income inequalities caused by globalization. For the empirical analysis, both random- and fixed-effects models with cluster-robust standard errors are utilized, as are comprehensive measures of globalization, welfare policy and income inequality. The results from 16 affluent democracies between 1980 and 2010 show that some aspects of globalization were significantly related to increased income inequality; however, the relationship was also significantly moderated by generous welfare benefit programmes. These findings support the argument that welfare systems play a critical role in compensating for the rising income inequalities caused by globalization.
AldersonA.DoranK. (2013) ‘How Has Income Inequality Grown? The Reshaping of the Income Distribution in LIS Countries’, in GurnickJ.C.JanttiM. (eds.) Income Inequality: Economic Disparities and the Middle Class in Affluent Countries, pp. 51–76. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
AldersonA.NielsenF. (2002) ‘Globalization and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries’, American Journal of Sociology107(5): 1244–99.
3.
AlesinaA.RodrikD. (1994) ‘Distributive Politics and Economic Growth’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics108(2): 465–90.
4.
AndersonC.PontussonJ. (2007) ‘Workers, Worries and Welfare States: Social Protection and Job Insecurity in 15 OECD Countries’, European Journal of Political Research46(2): 211–35.
5.
BarrN. (2001) The Welfare State as Piggy Bank: Information, Risk, Uncertainty, and the Role of the State. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BeckN. (2001) ‘Time-Series–Cross-Section Data: What Have We Learned in the Past Few Years’, Annual Review of Political Science4(1): 271–93.
7.
BeramendiP.CusackT.R. (2009) ‘Diverse Disparities: The Politics and Economics of Wage, Market, and Disposable Income Inequalities’, Political Research Quarterly62(2): 257–75.
8.
BerghA.NilssonT. (2010) ‘Do Liberalization and Globalization Increase Income Inequality?’, European Journal of Political Economy26(4): 488–505.
9.
BorjasG. (2006) ‘Native Internal Migration and the Labor Market Impact of Immigration’, Journal of Human Resources41(2): 221–58.
10.
BradleyD.HuberE.MollerS.NielsenF.StephensJ.D. (2003) ‘Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies’, World Politics55(2): 193–228.
11.
BradyD. (2009) ‘Economic Globalization and Increasing Earnings Inequality in Affluent Democracies’, Research in the Sociology of Work18: 149–84.
12.
BradyD.DennistonR. (2006) ‘Economic Globalization, Industrialization and Deindustri-alization in Affluent Democracies’, Social Forces85(1): 297–329.
13.
BradyD.BeckfieldJ.Seeleib-KaiserM. (2005) ‘Economic Globalization and the Welfare State in Affluent Democracies, 1975–2001’, American Sociological Review70(6): 921–48.
14.
BradyD.HuberE.StephensJ.D. (2014) Comparative Welfare States Data Set. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina; Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
CassetteA.FleuryN.PetitS. (2012) ‘Income Inequalities and International Trade in Goods and Services: Short- and Long-Run Evidence’, The International Trade Journal26(3): 223–54.
17.
CusackT. (2004) Data on Public Employment and Wages for 21 OECD countries. WZB (Berlin Social Research Center).
18.
DreherA.GastonN. (2008) ‘Has Globalization Increased Inequality?’, Review of International Economics16(3): 516–36.
19.
EdwardsS. (1997) ‘Trade Policy, Growth, and Income Distribution’, The American Economic Review87(2): 205–10.
20.
Esping-AndersenG. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Esping-AndersenG.KorpiW. (1987) ‘From Poor Relief to Institutional Welfare States: The Development of Scandinavian Social Policy’, in EricksonR.HansenE.J.RingenS.UusitaloH. (eds) The Scandinavian Model, pp. 39–74. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
22.
Esping-AndersenG.MylesJ. (2009) ‘Economic Inequality and the Welfare State’, in SalverdaW.NolanB.SmeedingT. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, pp. 639–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
FreemanR. (2007) ‘The Challenge of the Growing Globalization of Labor Markets to Economic and Welfare Policy’, in PausE. (ed.) Global Capitalism Unbound: Winners and Losers From Offshore Outsourcing, pp. 23–39. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
GarrettG. (1998) Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
GarrettG. (2001) ‘Globalization and Government Spending Around the World’, Studies in Comparative International Development35: 3–29.
26.
GarrettG.MitchellD. (2001) ‘Globalization, Government Spending and Taxation in the OECD’, European Journal of Political Research39(2): 145–77.
27.
GoldenM.WallersteinM. (2011) ‘Domestic and International Causes for the Rise of Pay Inequality in OECD Nations Between 1980 and 2000’, Research in the Sociology of Work22(1): 209–49.
28.
GreeneW. (2012) Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29.
HallP.SoskiceD. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
HarrisonA. (2007) Globalization and Poverty. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
31.
HausmanJ. (1978) ‘Specification Tests in Econometrics’, Econometrica46(6): 1251–71.
32.
HaysJ.EhrlichS.PeinhardtC. (2005) ‘Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD: An Empirical Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis’, International Organization59(2): 473–94.
33.
HeckscherE. (1949) ‘The Effect of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income’, in American Economic Association (ed.) Readings in the Theory of International Trade, pp. 272–300. Philadelphia, PA: Blakiston.
34.
HelpmanE. (2004) The Mystery of Economic Growth. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
HsiaoC. (2003) Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
HuberE.StephensJ.D. (2014) ‘Income Inequality and Redistribution in Post-Industrial Democracies: Demographic, Economic and Political Determinants’, Socio-Economic Review12(2): 245–67.
37.
KallebergA. (2009) ‘Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition’, American Sociological Review74(1): 1–22.
38.
KarcherS.SteinbergD.A. (2013) ‘Assessing the Causes of Capital Account Liberalization: How Measurement Matters’, International Studies Quarterly57(1): 128–37.
39.
KenworthyL.PontussonJ. (2005) ‘Rising Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Affluent Countries’, Perspectives on Politics3(3): 449–71.
40.
KollmeyerC. (2015) ‘Globalization and Income Inequality: How Public Sector Spending Moderates This Relationship in Affluent Countries’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology56(1): 3–28.
41.
KorpiW.PalmeJ. (2003) ‘New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95’, American Political Science Review97(3): 425–46.
42.
KosterF. (2009) ‘The Welfare State and Globalization: Down and Out or Too Tough to Die?’, International Journal of Social Welfare18(2): 153–62.
43.
LiH.SquireL.ZouH. (1998) ‘Explaining International and Intertemporal Variations in Income Inequality’, The Economic Journal108(446): 26–43.
MahlerV. (2004) ‘Economic Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Income Inequality in the Developed Countries: A Cross-National Study’, Comparative Political Studies37(9): 1025–53.
46.
MillsM.BlossfeldH.BuccholzS.HofackerD.BernardiF.HofmeisterH. (2008) ‘Converging Divergences? An International Comparison of the Impact of Globalization on Industrial Relations and Employment Careers’, International Sociology23: 561–94.
47.
MishkinF. (2006) The Next Great Globalization: How Disadvantaged Nations Can Harness Their Financial Systems to Get Rich. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
MoeneK.O.WallersteinM. (2001) ‘Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution’, American Political Science Review95(4): 859–74.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016b) OECD.Stat, available at: https://stats.oecd.org.
51.
PalmeJ. (2006) ‘Welfare States and Inequality: Institutional Designs and Distributive Outcome’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility24(4): 387–403.
52.
ReuvenyR.LiQ. (2003) ‘Economic Openness, Democracy, and Income Inequality: An Empirical Analysis’, Comparative Political Studies36(5): 575–601.
53.
RodrikD. (1997) Has Globalization Gone Too Far?Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
54.
RodrikD. (1998) ‘Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?’, Journal of Political Economy106(5): 997–1032.
55.
RogowskiR. (1989) Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
RudraN. (2004) ‘Openness, Welfare Spending, and Inequality in the Developing World’, International Studies Quarterly48: 683–709.
57.
SavvidesA. (1998) ‘Trade Policy and Income Inequality: New Evidence’, Economics Letters61: 365–72.
58.
ScheveK.SlaughterM. (2001) Globalization and the Perceptions of American Workers. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute.
59.
ScheveK.SlaughterM. (2004) ‘Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production’, American Journal of Political Science48(4): 662–74.
60.
ScruggsL.AllanJ. (2007) ‘The Material Consequences of Welfare States: Benefit Generosity and Absolute Poverty in 16 OECD Countries’, Comparative Political Studies39(7): 880–904.
61.
ScruggsL.JahnD.KuittoK. (2014a) Comparative Welfare Entitlements Dataset 2, version 2014-03. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut; Greifswald: University of Greifswald.
62.
ScruggsL.JahnD.KuittoK. (2014b) Comparative Welfare Entitlements Dataset 2 Codebook, version 2014-03. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut; Greifswald: University of Greifswald.
63.
SwankD. (2002) Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
WallaceM.GauchatG.FullertonA. (2011) ‘Globalization, Labor Market Transformation, and Metropolitan Earnings Inequality’, Social Science Research40(1): 15–36.
65.
WalterS. (2010) ‘Globalization and the Welfare State: Testing the Microfoundations of the Compensation Hypothesis’, International Studies Quarterly54(2): 403–26.
66.
WoodA. (1994) North-South Trade, Employment, and Inequality: Changing Fortunes in a Skill-Driven World. New York: Oxford University Press.
67.
WooldridgeJ. (2012) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
