According to liberal nationalists, sharing a national identity offers a solution to the growing concern that increasing diversity within Western societies might erode solidarity. Based on the national identity framework, a positive relation between peoples’ support for redistribution and their national identification is expected. Partially confirmed among majority group members, the aim of this study is to broaden the perspective and investigate the redistributive attitudes of people with a migration background. Since the social identification of people with a migration background is more complex and tends to be based on belonging to both the nation of residence and a specific ethnic group, we additionally consider the role of ethnic identification. We perform multivariate analyses on data from the Belgian Ethnic Minorities Election Study 2014 (BEMES), a survey conducted among Belgians of Turkish and Moroccan descent. The results confirm our hypothesis about the positive role of national identification. Ethnic identification, on the contrary, is negatively related to support for redistribution and particularly the combination of a low attachment to the country of residence and strong attachment to the country of origin is associated with lower levels of support for redistribution.
AbramsD.WetherellM.CochraneS.HoggM.A.TurnerJ.C. (1990) ‘Knowing What to Think by Knowing Who You Are: Self-Categorization and the Nature of Norm Formation, Conformity and Group Polarization’, British Journal of Social Psychology29: 97–119.
2.
AlbertiniM.SemprebonM. (2018) ‘A Burden to the Welfare State? Expectations of Non-EU Migrants on Welfare Support’, Journal of European Social Policy28: 501–16.
3.
AlesinaA.GlaeserE.SacerdoteB. (2001) ‘Why Doesn’t the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity2001: 187–254.
4.
AshmoreR.D.DeauxK.McLaughlin-VolpeT. (2004) ‘An Organizing Framework for Collective Identity: Articulation and Significance of Multidimensionality’, Psychological Bulletin130: 80–114.
5.
BélandD.LecoursA. (2005) ‘Nationalism, Public Policy, and Institutional Development: Social Security in Belgium’, Journal of Public Policy25: 265–85.
6.
BerryJ.W. (2005) ‘Acculturation: Living Successfully in Two Cultures’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations29: 697–712.
BreidahlK.N.HoltugN.KongshøjK. (2017) ‘Do Shared Values Promote Social Cohesion? If So, Which? Evidence from Denmark’, European Political Science Review10: 97–118.
9.
CitrinJ.SearsD.O. (2009) ‘Balancing National and Ethnic Identities: The Psychology of E Pluribus Unum’. In: AbdelalR.HerreraY.M.JohnstonA.I.McDermottR. (eds) Measuring Identity: A Guide for Social Scientists, pp. 145–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CitrinJ.WongC.DuffB. (2001) ‘The Meaning of American National Identity’. In: AshmoreRDJussimLWilderD (eds.), Social Identity, Intergroup Conflict, and Conflict Reduction, pp.71–100. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
CrepazM.M.L.DamronR. (2009) ‘Constructing Tolerance: How the Welfare State Shapes Attitudes about Immigrants’, Comparative Political Studies42: 437–63.
12.
De VroomeT.VerkuytenM.MartinovicB. (2014) ‘Host National Identification of Immigrants in the Netherlands’, International Migration Review48: 76–102.
13.
DancygierR.SaundersE.N. (2006) ‘A New Electorate? Comparing Preferences and Partisanship between Immigrants and Natives’, American Journal of Political Science50: 962–81.
14.
DeanH.KhanZ. (1997) ‘Muslim Perspectives on Welfare’, Journal of Social Policy26: 193–209.
15.
DegenD.KuhnT.Van der BrugW. (2018) ‘Granting Immigrants Access to Social Benefits? How Self-Interest Influences Support for Welfare State Restrictiveness’, Journal of European Social Policy29 (2): 148–165.
16.
ErvastiH. (2012) ‘Is There a Religious Factor Involved in Support for the Welfare State in Europe?’. In: ErvastiH.GoulJ.RingdalK (eds) The Future of the Welfare State: Social Policy Attitudes and Social Capital in Europe, pp. 214–29. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
17.
FleischmannF.PhaletK. (2016) ‘Identity Conflict or Compatibility: A Comparison of Muslim Minorities in Five European Cities’, Political Psychology37: 447–63.
18.
FontJ.MéndezM. (2013) Surveying Ethnic Minorities and Immigrant Populations: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
19.
FreemanG.P. (1986) ‘Migration and the Political Economy of the Welfare State’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science485: 51–63.
20.
GalleJ.AbtsK.SwyngedouwM.MeulemanB. (2019) ‘Attitudes of Turkish and Moroccan Belgians Toward Redistribution and Government Responsibility: The Role of Perceived Discrimination, Generation and Religious Involvement’, International Migration Review. Epub ahead of print 14 March 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0197918319830695.
21.
GsirS.MandinJ.MescoliE. (2015) Corridor Report on Belgium: Moroccan and Turkish Immigration in Belgium. San Domenico di Fiesole (FI): Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.
22.
HeathA.F.FisherS.D.RosenblattG.SandersD.SobolewskaM. (2013) The Political Integration of Ethnic Minorities in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
HelblingM.ReeskensT.WrightM. (2016) ‘The Mobilisation of Identities: A Study on the Relationship between Elite Rhetoric and Public Opinion on National Identity in Developed Democracies’, Nations and Nationalism22: 744–67.
24.
HolmJ. (2016) ‘A Model of Redistribution Under Social Identification in Heterogeneous Federations’, Journal of Public Economics143: 39–48.
25.
HoltugN. (2016) ‘Identity, Causality and Social Cohesion’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies43: 1084–100.
26.
HoogheL.MarksG. (2005) ‘Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration’, European Union Politics6: 419–43.
27.
HutnikN. (1991) Ethnic Minority Identity: A Social Psychological Perspective. New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
28.
JohnstonR.BantingK.KymlickaW.SorokaS. (2010) ‘National Identity and Support for the Welfare State’, Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique43: 349–77.
29.
KangasO.E. (1997) ‘Self-Interest and the Common Good: The Impact of Norms, Selfishness and Context in Social Policy Opinions’, The Journal of Socio-Economics26: 475–94.
30.
KramerR.M.BrewerM.B. (1984) ‘Effects of Group Identity on Resource Use in a Simulated Commons Dilemma’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46: 1044–57.
31.
KremerM. (2016) ‘Earned Citizenship: Labour Migrants’ Views on the Welfare State’, Journal of Social Policy45: 395–415.
32.
KunovichR.M. (2009) ‘The Sources and Consequences of National Identification’, American Sociological Review74: 573–93.
33.
LeónF.J. (2012) ‘Reciprocity and Public Support for the Redistributive Role of the State’, Journal of European Social Policy22: 198–215.
34.
LoewenthalK.M.MacLeodA.K.CinnirellaM. (2002) ‘Are Women More Religious Than Men? Gender Differences in Religious Activity among Different Religious Groups in the UK’, Personality and Individual Differences32: 133–9.
35.
LubbersM.DiehlC.KuhnT.LarsenC.A. (2018) ‘Migrants’ Support for Welfare State Spending in Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands’, Social Policy & Administration52: 895–913.
36.
LuttmerE.F.P. (2001) ‘Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution’, Journal of Political Economy109: 500–28.
37.
LuttmerE.F.P.SinghalM. (2011) ‘Culture, Context, and the Taste for Redistribution’, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy3: 157–79.
38.
MarshallT.H. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
MartensA.VerhoevenH. (2006) ‘Etnische Minderheden Op De Arbeidsmarkt in België’. In: KhaderB.MartinielloM.ReaA.ChristianeT. (eds) Immigratie En Integratie Anders Denken: Een Belgisch Interuniversitair Initiatief, pp. 265–90. Brussel: Bruylant.
40.
Martinez-HerreraE. (2004) ‘Liberal-Nationalist Theory, Political Confidence, and Support for the Welfare State. Evidence from Britain’, EUI Working Paper SPS no. 2004/08, July 2004. San Domenico Di Fiesole: European University Institute, Department of Political and Social Sciences.
41.
MillerD. (1995) On Nationality. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
MillerD.AliS. (2014) ‘Testing the National Identity Argument’, European Political Science Review6: 237–59.
PhaletK.SwyngedouwM. (2002) ‘National Identities and Representations of Citizenship: A Comparison of Turks, Moroccans and Working-Class Belgians in Brussels’, Ethnicities2: 5–30.
45.
ReeskensT.Van OorschotW. (2015) ‘Immigrants’ Attitudes Towards Welfare Redistribution. An Exploration of Role of Government Preferences among Immigrants and Natives across 18 European Welfare States’, European Sociological Review31: 433–45.
46.
ReeskensT.Van der MeerT. (2018) ‘The Inevitable Deservingness Gap: A Study into the Insurmountable Immigrant Penalty in Perceived Welfare Deservingness’, Journal of European Social Policy29(2): 166–181.
47.
RenemaJ.A.J.LubbersM. (2018) ‘Immigrants’ Support for Social Spending, Self-interest and the Role of the Group: A Comparative Study of Immigrants in the Netherlands’, International Journal of Social Welfare. Epub ahead of print 19 July. DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12330.
48.
RoccasS.BrewerM.B. (2002) ‘Social Identity Complexity’, Personality and Social Psychology Review6: 88–106.
49.
RumbautR.G.ImaK. (1988) The Adaptation of Southeast Asian Refugee Youth: A Comparative Study. Final Report. Washington, DC: US Office of Refugee Resettlement.
50.
Schmidt-CatranA.W.CarejaR. (2017) ‘Institutions, Culture and Migrants’ Preference for State-Provided Welfare. Longitudinal Evidence from Germany’, Journal of European Social Policy27: 197–212.
51.
SchoonvaereQ. (2013) Demografische studie over de populatie van Turkse herkomst in België. Brussels: Centre de recherche en démographie et sociétés and Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding. Available at: https://www.myria.be/nl/publicaties/belgie-turkije-50-jaar-migratie
52.
SchoonvaereQ. (2014) België-Marokko: 50 jaar migratie. Demografische studie over de populatie van Marokkaanse herkomst in België. Brussels: Centre de recherche en démographie et sociétés and Federaal Migratiecentrum. Available at: https://www.myria.be/nl/publicaties/belgie-marokko-50-jaar-migratie
53.
SearsD.O.LauR.R.TylerT.R.AllenH.M.Jr. (1980) ‘Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting’, The American Political Science Review74: 670–84.
54.
ShayoM. (2009) ‘A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution’, American Political Science Review103: 147–74.
55.
SimonB.GrabowO. (2010) ‘The Politicization of Migrants: Further Evidence That Politicized Collective Identity Is a Dual Identity’, Political Psychology31: 717–38.
56.
SimonB.KlandermansB. (2001) ‘Politicized Collective Identity: A Social Psychological Analysis’, American Psychologist56: 319–31.
57.
SinghP. (2015) ‘Subnationalism and Social Development: A Comparative Analysis of Indian States’, World Politics67: 506–62.
58.
StaerkléC.SidaniusJ.GreenE.G.T.MolinaL.E. (2010) ‘Ethnic Minority–Majority Asymmetry in National Attitudes around the World: A Multilevel Analysis’, Political Psychology31: 491–519.
59.
SwyngedouwM.MeulemanB.AbtsK.HassanB.JolienG. (2015) Belgian Ethnic Minorities Election Study 2014. Codebook: Questions and Frequency Tables. Leuven: ISPO-KU Leuven & CLEO/CEDEM-Université de Liège.
60.
TajfelH. (1982) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Theiss-MorseE. (2009) Who Counts as an American? The Boundaries of National Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
TimmermanC.VanderwaerenE.CrulM. (2003) ‘The Second Generation in Belgium’, International Migration Review37: 1065–90.
63.
TimonenV.DoyleM. (2009) ‘In Search of Security: Migrant Workers’ Understandings, Experiences and Expectations Regarding “social Protection” in Ireland’, Journal of Social Policy38: 157–75.
64.
TorrekensC.AdamI. (2015) Marokkaanse En Turkse Belgen: Een (Zelf)portret Van Onze Medeburgers. Brussel: Koning Boudewijnstichting.
65.
TurnerJ.C.HoggM.A.OakesP.J.ReicherWetherellM.S. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
66.
Van OorschotW. (2008) ‘Solidarity Towards Immigrants in European Welfare States’, International Journal of Social Welfare17: 3–14.
67.
Van OorschotW. (2010) ‘Public Perceptions of the Economic, Moral, Social and Migration Consequences of the Welfare State: An Empirical Analysis of Welfare State Legitimacy’, Journal of European Social Policy20: 19–31.
68.
Van den BrouckeS.NoppeJ.StuyckK.BuysschaertP.DoyenG.WetsJ. (2015) Vlaamse Migratie- En Integratiemonitor 2015. Antwerpen and Brussels: Steunpunt Inburgering en Integratie/Agentschap Binnenlands Bestuur.
69.
WrightM.ReeskensT. (2013) ‘Of What Cloth Are the Ties That Bind? National Identity and Support for the Welfare State across 29 European Cousntries’, Journal of European Public Policy20: 1443–63.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
