The article presents an analysis of the development of labour market risks in Germany in light of changing working poverty risks. Low hourly wages and part-time employment are identified as the main demand-side-related mechanisms for household poverty. Their measurement and development are discussed as well as their contribution to trends in working poverty risks. A rise in low wages, especially among part-time employed households, was decisive for the increase in working poverty risks in Germany by 45% between the end of the 1990s and the end of the 2000s. We therefore study these trends more closely in the multivariate analysis. The results show that while low wages are unequally distributed across occupations and industries, shifts in employment between sectors explain only a minor part of the change in low wages. However, they reveal a polarization of low-wage risks by skill-level and sector of employment, on the one hand, and full-time and part-time employees, on the other hand.
AbrassartA. (2015) ‘Low-Skill Jobs or Jobs for Low-Skilled Workers? An Analysis of the Institutional Determinants of the Employment Rates of Low-Educated Workers in 19 OECD Countries, 1997–2010’, Journal of European Social Policy25(2): 225–41.
2.
AndreßH.-.J.LohmannH. (2008) The Working Poor in Europe: Employment, Poverty, and Globalization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
3.
AtkinsonA.B.RainwaterL.SmeedingT.M. (1994) ‘Income Distribution in European Countries’, LIS Working Paper, Luxembourg, December. Available at: http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/121.pdf.
4.
BerningerI.SchröderT. (2015) ‘Niedriglohn und Working Poor: Normalarbeit differenziert nach Geschlecht und Branche’, in DingeldeyI.HoltrupA.WarsewaG. (eds) Wandel der Governance der Erwerbsarbeit, pp. 169–91. Wiesbaden: Springer.
5.
BlauF.D.KahnL.M. (2002) At Home and Abroad: U.S. Labor–Market Performance in International Perspective. New York: Russell Sage.
6.
BoschG.WeinkopfC. (2008) Low-Wage Work in Germany. New York: Russell Sage.
7.
BradyD.BakerR.S.FinniganR. (2013) ‘When Unionization Disappears: State-Level Unionization and Working Poverty in the United States’, American Sociological Review78(5): 872–96.
8.
CantillonB. (2011) ‘The Paradox of the Social Investment State: Growth, Employment and Poverty in the Lisbon Era’, Journal of European Social Policy21(5): 432–49.
9.
CantillonB.VandenbrouckeF. (eds) (2014) Reconciling Work and Poverty Reduction: How Successful Are European Welfare States?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
CastellsM.AoyamaY. (1994) ‘Paths Towards the Informational Society: Employment Structure in G-7 Countries, 1920–90’, International Labour Review133: 5.
11.
CorneoG.ZmerliS.PollakR. (2014) ‘Germany: Rising Inequality and the Transformation of Rhine Capitalism’, in NolanB.SalverdaW.ChecchiD.MarxI.McKnightA.TothI. G.et al. (eds) Changing Inequalities and Societal Impacts in Rich Countries, pp. 271–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
CrettazE. (2011) Fighting Working Poverty in Post-Industrial Economies: Causes, Trade-Offs and Policy Solutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
13.
CrettazE. (2013) ‘A State-Of Review of Working Poverty in Advanced Economies: Theoretical Models, Measurement Issues and Risk Groups’, Journal of European Social Policy23(4): 347–62.
14.
CrettazE.BonoliG. (2011) ‘Worlds of Working Poverty: National Variations in Mechanisms’, in FraserN.GutiérrezR.Peña-CasasR. (eds) Working Poverty in Europe: A Comparative Approach, pp. 46–72. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
CromptonR. (1999) Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DingeldeyI.BerningerI. (2013) ‘Familienlohn und Armutssicherung im Normalarbeitsverhältnis’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie65(4): 669–96.
17.
DiPreteT.A. (2005) ‘Labor Markets, Inequality, and Change: a European Perspective’, Work and Occupations32(2): 119–39.
18.
DustmannC.LudsteckJ.SchönbergU. (2009) ‘Revisiting the German Wage Structure’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics124(2): 843–81.
19.
EichhorstW.MarxP. (2011) ‘Reforming German Labour Market Institutions: A Dual Path to Flexibility’, Journal of European Social Policy21: 73–87.
20.
EmmeneggerP.HausermannS.PalierB.Seeleib-KaiserM. (2012) The Age of Dualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
European Commission (2002) Joint Report on Social Inclusion. Luxembourg.
22.
FouargeD.MuffelsR. (2009) ‘Working Part-Time in the British, German and Dutch Labour Market: Scarring for the Wage Career?’ Schmollers Jahrbuch129(2): 217–26.
23.
FraserN.GutiérrezR.Peña-CasasR. (eds) (2011) Working Poverty in Europe: A Comparative Approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
GautiéJ.SchmittJ. (eds) (2010) Low-Wage Work in the Wealthy World. New York: Russell Sage.
25.
GebelM.GieseckeJ. (2011) ‘Labor Market Flexibility and Inequality: the Changing Skill-Based Temporary Employment and Unemployment Risks in Europe’, Social Forces90(1): 17–39.
26.
GießelmannM. (2009) ‘Arbeitsmarktpolitischer Wandel in Deutschland seit 1991 und das Working Poor – Problem: Einsteiger als Verlierer des Reformprozesses?’ Zeitschrift für Soziologie38(3): 215–38.
27.
GießelmannM. (2015) ‘Differences in the Patterns of In-Work Poverty in Germany and the UK’, European Societies17(1): 27–46.
28.
GieseckeJ. (2009) ‘Socio-Economic Risks of Atypical Employment Relationships: Evidence from the German Labour Market’, European Sociological Review25(6): 629–46.
29.
GieseckeJ.HeisigJ.P. (2010) ‘Destabilisierung und Destandardisierung, aber für wen? Die Entwicklung der westdeutschen Arbeitsplatzmobilität seit 1984’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie62(3): 403–35.
30.
GieseckeJ.VerwiebeR. (2009) ‘Wachsende Lohnungleichheit in Deutschland’, Berliner Journal für Soziologie19(4): 531–55.
31.
GieseckeJ.HeisigJ.P.SolgaH. (2015) ‘Getting More Unequal: Rising Labor Market Inequalities among Low-Skilled Men in West Germany’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility39: 1–17.
32.
HakimC. (1997) ‘A Sociological Perspective on Part-Time Work’, in BlossfeldH-P.HakimC. (eds) Between Equalization and Marginalization: Part-Time Working Women in Europe and the United States, pp. 22–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
HallerödB.EkbrandH.BengtssonM. (2015) ‘In-Work Poverty and Labour Market Trajectories: Poverty Risks among the Working Population in 22 European Countries’, Journal of European Social Policy25(5): 473–88.
34.
HeidenreichM. (2015) ‘The End of the Honeymoon: the Increasing Differentiation of (Long-Term) Unemployment Risks in Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy25(4): 393–413.
35.
HousemanS. (1995) ‘Part-Time Employment in Europe and Japan’, Journal of Labor Research16(3): 249–62.
36.
HousemanS. (2001) ‘Why Employers Use Flexible Staffing Arrangements: Evidence from an Establishment Survey’, Industrial & Labor Relations Review55(1): 149–70.
37.
KallebergA.L. (2009) ‘Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition’, American Sociological Review74(1): 1–22.
38.
KallebergA.L. (2011) Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.
39.
KenworthyL. (2008) Jobs with Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
LevanonA.GanglM.BrülleJ.SaburovE. (2015) ‘Trends in the Demographic Composition of Poverty among Workers in Germany and in Israel, 1991-2011’, Paper presented at the Summer Meeting of the International Sociological Association Research Committee on Stratification and Social Mobility (RC28), 17-19 August. Philadelphia, PA.
41.
LohmannH. (2009) ‘Welfare States, Labour Market Institutions and the Working Poor: A Comparative Analysis of 20 European Countries’, European Sociological Review25(4): 489–504.
42.
LohmannH. (2010) ‘Armut von Erwerbstätigen im europäischen Vergleich’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie62(1): 1–30.
43.
LohmannH.GießelmannM. (2010) ‘Armut von Erwerbstätigen in Ost- und Westdeutschland: die Bedeutung von niedrigen Löhnen und unterschiedlichen Erwerbsmustern’, in KrauseP.OstnerI. (eds) Leben in Ost- und Westdeutschland: eine sozialwissenschaftliche Bilanz der deutschen Einheit 1990 - 2010, pp. 299–311. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
44.
MasonG.SalverdaW. (2010) ‘Low Pay, Working Conditions, and Living Standards’, in GautiéJ.SchmittJ. (eds) Low-Wage Work in the Wealthy World, pp. 35–90. New York: Russell Sage.
45.
MöllerJ. (2015) ‘Did the German Model Survive the Labor Market Reforms?’ Journal for Labour Market Research: 1–18.
46.
MöllerJ.HutterC. (2011) ‘The Effects of Age, Skill and Sector Composition on the Wage Inequality in Germany’, in GenserB.RamserH.J.StadlerM. (eds) Umverteilung und soziale Gerechtigkeit, pp. 9–32. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
47.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015) In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD.
48.
PalierB.ThelenK. (2010) ‘Institutionalizing Dualism: Complementarities and Change in France and Germany’, Politics & Society38(1): 119–48.
49.
RovnyA.E. (2014) ‘The Capacity of Social Policies to Combat Poverty among New Social Risk Groups’, Journal of European Social Policy24(5): 405–23.
50.
SassenS. (1996) ‘Service Employment Regimes and the New Inequality’, in MingioneE. (ed.) Urban Poverty and the Underclass, pp. 64–82. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
51.
StreeckW. (1995) ‘German Capitalism: Does It Exist? Can It Survive?’ Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung (MPIFG) Discussion Paper. Available at: http://www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp95-5.pdf.
52.
ThelenK.A. (2014) Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity: Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
TrappeH.Pollmann-SchultM.SchmittC. (2015) ‘The Rise and Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model: Institutional Underpinnings and Future Expectations’, European Sociological Review31(2): 230–42.
54.
VogelC. (2009) ‘Teilzeitbeschäftigung: Ausmaß und Bestimmungsgründe der Erwerbsübergänge von Frauen’, Zeitschrift für Arbeitsmarkt-Forschung [Journal for Labour Market Research] 42(2): 170–81.
55.
WagnerG.G.FrickJ.R.SchuppJ. (2007) ‘The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP): Scope, Evolution and Enhancements’, Schmollers Jahrbuch127(1): 139–69.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
