Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-7
Is part-time employment a temporary ‘stepping stone’ or a lasting ‘mommy track’? Legislation and mothers’ transition to full-time employment in Germany
Research on reconciling family and employment debates if maternal part-time employment works as ‘stepping stone’ to full-time employment or as gateway to a long-term ‘mommy track’. We analyse how mothers’ transition from part-time to full-time employment is shaped by changing reconciliation legislations and how this is moderated by reconciliation-relevant factors like individual behaviours and macro conditions. We extend the literature on work–family reconciliation by investigating mothers’ employment behaviour after the birth of their last child, i.e., after the family formative phase. We draw upon Germany with its considerable regional and historical heterogeneity. Using event history methods on SOEP-data, we observe mothers who (re)enter part-time employment (i.e., up to 30 weekly working hours) after their last childbirth. Results suggest that the impact of reconciliation legislations depends on the moderation by other factors. Recent reconciliation-friendly legislations may have contributed to the polarization of maternal employment patterns: more and less employment-oriented mothers diverge sooner after childbirth than before. Legislations co-occur with increases both in childcare institutions and part-time culture, but their moderation effects compete. Hence, boosting part-time work as either a ‘stepping stone’ or a ‘mommy track’ requires a deep understanding of the mechanisms behind legislations as well as more explicit policy incentives.
BaxterJBuchlerSPeralesF, et al. (2015) A life-changing event: first births and men’s and women’s attitudes to mothering and gender divisions of labor. Social Forces93(3): 989–1014.
2.
BlauFDKahnLM (2013) Female labor supply: why is the United States falling behind?The American Economic Review103(3): 251–256.
3.
BlossfeldH-PGolschKRohwerG (2007) Event History Analysis with Stata. Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
BoothALvan OursJC (2013) Part-time jobs: what women want?Journal of Population Economics26: 263–283.
5.
BrehmU (2020) Diverging patterns in women’s reconciliation behavior across family policies and educational groups. Social Politics27(1): 128–155.
6.
BrooksCBolzendahlC (2004) The transformation of US gender role attitudes: cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research33(1): 106–133.
7.
ConnollySGregoryM (2008) Moving down: women’s part-time work and occupational change in Britain 1991–2001. The Economic Journal118: F52–F76.
8.
ConnollySGregoryM (2010) Dual tracks: part-time work in life cycle employment for British women. Journal of Population Economics23(3): 907–931.
9.
DavisSNGreensteinTN (2009) Gender ideology: components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology35(1): 87–105.
10.
DearingHHoferHLietzC, et al. (2007) Why are mothers working longer hours in Austria than in Germany? A comparative microsimulation analysis. Fiscal Studies28(4): 463–495.
11.
Destatis (Statistisches Bundesamt) (2019) Statistik der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe: Verfügbare Plätze in Tageseinrichtungen für Kinder der entsprechenden Altersgruppen nach Art der Plätze und Platz-Kind-Relation nach Ländern 1990-2002. Wiesbaden: Destatis.
12.
Destatis (Statistisches Bundesamt) (2022a) Beschäftigung nach Vollzeit/Teilzeittätigkeit, Geschlecht und Bundesländer. Wiesbaden: Destatis.
13.
Destatis (Statistisches Bundesamt) (2022b) Statistik der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe: Kinder in Kindertageseinrichtungen und Kinder in Kindertagespflege, die nicht zusätzlich eine Kindertageseinrichtung oder eine Ganztagsschule besuchen, nach Altersgruppen und Besuchsquote 2006–2020. Wiesbaden: Destatis.
14.
Deutscher Bundestag (1991) Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Große Anfrage Drucksache 12/167: Situation der Kindergärten, Krippen und Horte in den neuen Bundesländern. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
15.
DieckhoffMGashVMertensA, et al. (2016) A stalled revolution? What can we learn from women’s drop-out to part-time jobs: a comparative analysis of Germany and the UK. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility46(B): 129–140.
16.
EriksonRGoldthorpeJH (1992) The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17.
EvertssonMGrunowD (2012) Women’s work interruptions and career prospects in Germany and Sweden. In: HennigM (ed) Mothers’ Labor Market Participation. Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 561–575.
18.
FalkSSchaeperH (2001) Erwerbsverläufe von ost- und westdeutschen Müttern im Vergleich: Ein Land – ein Muster? In BornCKrügerH (eds) Individualisierung und Verflechtung: Geschlecht und Generation im deutschen Lebenslaufregime. Weinheim, München: Juventa, 181–210.
19.
Fernández KranzDPaulMRodríguez-PlanasN (2015) Part-time work, fixed-term contracts, and the returns to experience. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics77(4): 512–541.
20.
GallieDGebelMGieseckeJ, et al. (2016) Quality of work and job satisfaction: comparing female part-time work in four European countries. International Review of Sociology26(3): 457–481.
21.
GoldscheiderFBernhardtELappegårdT (2015) The gender revolution: a framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review41(2): 207–239.
22.
GrunowDBegallKBuchlerS (2018) Gender ideologies in Europe: a multidimensional framework. Journal of Marriage and Family80(1): 42–60.
23.
HakimC (2011) Women’s lifestyle preferences in the 21st century: implications for family policy. In: BeetsGSchippersJte VeldeER (eds) The Future of Motherhood in Western Societies: Late Fertility and its Consequence. Dordrecht, New York: Springer, 177–195.
24.
HankKTillmannKWagnerGG (2001) Außerhäusliche Kinderbetreuung in Ostdeutschland vor und nach der Wiedervereinigung: Ein Vergleich mit Westdeutschland in den Jahren 1990-1999. MPIDR Working Paper 003. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
25.
HippLBernhardtJAllmendingerJ (2015) Institutions and the prevalence of nonstandard employment. Socio-Economic Review13(2): 351–377.
26.
KelleNSimonsonJGordoLR (2017) Is part-time employment after childbirth a stepping-stone into full-time work? A cohort study for East and West Germany. Feminist Economics23(4): 201–224.
27.
KremerM (2007) How Welfare States Care: Culture, Gender and Parenting in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
28.
KrohMKühneSSiegersR, et al. (2018) Documentation of sample Sizes and Panel Attrition in the German socio-economic Panel (SOEP) (1984 until 2016). SOEP Survey Papers 1106: Series C. Berlin: DIW/SOEP.
29.
LechevalierA (2019) Dynamics of gendered employment regimes in France and Germany over the two last decades: how can they be explained? In: Berrebi-HoffmannIGiraudORenardL, et al. (eds) Categories in Context: Gender and Work in France and Germany, 1900–Present. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books, 155–195.
30.
LückDDiabatéSRuckdeschelK (2017) Cultural conceptions of family as inhibitors of change in family lives: the ‘Leitbild’ approach. In: ČesnuitytėVLückDWidmerED (eds) Family Continuity and Change: Contemporary European Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 61–86.
31.
Madero-CabibIFasangAE (2016) Gendered work–family life courses and financial well-being in retirement. Advances in Life Course Research27: 43–60.
32.
MandelHSemyonovM (2006) A welfare state paradox: state interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology111(6): 1910–1949.
33.
MånssonJOttossonJ (2011) Transitions from part-time unemployment: is part-time work a dead end or a stepping stone to the labour market?Economic and Industrial Democracy32(4): 569–589.
34.
MatteazziEPailhéASolazA (2014) Part-time wage penalties for women in prime age: a matter of selection or segregation? Evidence from four European countries. ILR Review67(3): 955–985.
35.
MatysiakASteinmetzS (2006) Who Follows Whom? Female Employment Patterns in West Germany, East Germany and Poland. Working Papers Nr 94. Mannheim: Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung.
OstnerI (2006) Paradigmenwechsel in der (west)deutschen Familienpolitik. In: BergerPA (ed) Der demographische Wandel: Chancen für die Neuordnung der Geschlechterverhältnisse. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 165–203.
38.
O’ReillyJBothfeldS (2002) What happens after working part-time? Integration, maintenance or exclusionary transitions in Britain and Western Germany. Cambridge Journal of Economics26(4): 409–439.
39.
Pfau-EffingerB (1998) Gender cultures and the gender arrangement: a theoretical framework for cross‐national gender research. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research11(2): 147–166.
40.
RosenfeldRATrappeHGornickJC (2004) Gender and work in Germany: before and after reunification. Annual Review of Sociology30(1): 103–124.
41.
StierHLewin‐EpsteinNBraunM (2001) Welfare regimes, family‐supportive policies, and women’s employment along the life‐course. American Journal of Sociology106(6): 1731–1760.
42.
TrappeHPollmann-SchultMSchmittC (2015) The rise and decline of the male breadwinner model: institutional underpinnings and future expectations. European Sociological Review31(2): 230–242.
43.
van BastelaerALemaîtreGMariannaP (1997) The definition of part-time work for the Purpose of international comparisons. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers No 22. Paris: OECD Publishing.
44.
WebberGWilliamsC (2008) Mothers in ‘good’ and ‘bad’ part-time jobs: different problems, same results. Gender & Society22(6): 752–777.
45.
ZiefleAGanglM (2014) Do women respond to changes in family policy? A quasi-experimental study of the duration of mothers’ employment interruptions in Germany. European Sociological Review30(5): 562–581.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
