Even though the shift from `passive' to `active' labour market policy exhibits large cross-national variations, all examples seem to share two common characteristics: (a) the first group exposed to the new policies and the group exposed to the harshest policies was young people on social assistance; and (b) as the target group gradually came to include `ordinary' unemployed people, most countries made exceptions for the oldest unemployed people. The article argues that this striking policy convergence has to do with the public perception of the target groups. The article substantiates this argument first, by giving a theoretical explanation for the different popular images of target groups, and second, by showing — using a national Australian sample — that these general popular images influence the way the public wants `active' labour market policy to be conducted.
Albrekt Larsen, C. (2002) `Policy Paradigms and Cross-national Policy (mis)Learning from the Danish Employment Miracle', Journal of European Public Policy9 (5): 715—35.
2.
Albrekt Larsen, C. (2006) The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes. How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support. Aldershot: Ashgate.
3.
Australian Government (2007) ` Guide to Social Security Law'. Available at: [http://www.facsia.gov.au/guides_acts/ssg/ssguide-3/ssguide-3.2/ssguide-3.2.10/ssguide-3.2.10.20.html].
4.
Bean, C. and Papadakis, E. (1998) `A Comparison of Mass Attitudes towards the Welfare State in Different Institutional Regimes, 1985—1990', International Journal of Public Opinion Research10: 211—36.
5.
Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003) `Public Attitudes to Welfare State Policies: a Comparative Analysis of 24 Nations', European Sociological Review19: 415—27.
6.
Brooks, C. and Manza, J. (forthcoming) Why Welfare States Persist: Public Opinion and the Future of Social Provision. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Burstein, P. (1998) `Bringing the Public Back In: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy?', Social Forces77 (1): 27—62.
8.
Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (forthcoming) Exploring the Dynamics of Reform — the Dependent Variable Problem in Comparative Welfare State Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9.
Cook, F. (1979) Who Should be Helped: Public Support for Social Services. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications
10.
Coughlin, R.M. (1980) `Ideology, Public Opinion and Welfare Policy: Attitudes Towards Taxes and Spending in Industrial Societies', Institute of International Studies, Research Series No. 42. Berkeley: University of California.
11.
Deet (1987) Skills for Australia . Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
12.
De Swaan, A. (1988) In Care of the State. Amsterdam : Bakker.
13.
Eardley, T. and Matheson, G. (1999) `Australian Attitudes to Unemployment and Unemployed People', SPRC Discussion Paper No. 102. Sydney: SPRC.
14.
Eardley, T., Saunders, P. and Evans, C. (2000) `Community Attitudes Towards Unemployment, Activity Testing and Mutual Obligation', SPRC Discussion Paper No. 107. Sydney: SPRC.
15.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1996) `After the Golden Age? Welfare State Dilemmas in a Global Economcy', in G. Esping-Andersen (ed.) Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptions in Global Economies. London: Sage Publications.
17.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2000) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
18.
Feagin, J. (1972) `Poverty: We Still Believe that God Helps Those Who Help Themselves', Psychology Today6: 101—29.
19.
Feather, N. (1974) `Explanation of Poverty in Australian and American Samples: the Person, Society and Fate', Australian Journal of Psychology26: 199—216.
20.
Gallie, D. and Paugam, S. (2002) `Social Precarity and Social Integration. Report for the European Commission Based on Eurobarometer 56.1'. Brussels: The European Commission.
21.
Goul Andersen, J., Albrekt Larsen, C. and Bendix Jensen, J. (2003) Marginalisering og Velfærdspolitik. Arbejdsløshed, jobchancer og trivsel [Marginalization and welfare policy. Unemployment, job possibilities and well-being]. Copenhagen : Frydenlund.
22.
Jacobs, L.R. (1993) The Health of Nations: Public Opinion and the Making of American and British Health Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.
Lødemel, I. and Trickey, H. (2000) An Offer You Can't Refuse. Workfare in International Perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.
24.
Oecd (1998) OECD Employment Outlook 1998 — Towards an Employment-centred Social Policy. Paris: OECD.
25.
Oecd (2001) Innovations in Labour Market Policies: the Australian Way. Paris: OECD.
26.
Oorschot, W.V. (2000) `Who Should Get What, and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity among the Public', Policy & Politics28: 33—48.
27.
Oorschot, W.V. (2005) `Immigrants, Welfare and Deservingness Opinions in European Welfare States', CCWS Working Paper No. 2005—34.
28.
Oorschot, W.V. and Arts, W. (2005) `The Social Capital of European Welfare States: the Crowding Out Hypothesis Revisited', Journal of European Social Policy15: 5—26.
29.
Parker, S. and Fopp, R. (2004) `The Mutual Obligation Policy in Australia: the Rhetoric and Reasoning of Recent Social Security Policy', ContemporaryPolitics10 (3—4): 257—69.
30.
Petterson, P.A. (1995) `The Welfare State: the Security Dimension', in O. Borre and E. Scarbourgh (eds) The Scope of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Pierson, P. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Pierson, P. (1996) `The New Politics of the Welfare State', World Politics48 (2): 143—79.
33.
Pierson, P. (2001) `Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies', in P. Pierson (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
Saunders, P., Thomson, C. and Evans, C. (2000) `Social Change and Social Policy: Results from a National Survey of Public Opinion', SPRC Discussion Paper No. 106. Sydney: SPRC.
35.
Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. (1993) `Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy', The American Political Science Review87 (2): 334—47.
36.
Shaver, S. (2002) `Australian Welfare Reform: from Citizenship to Supervision', Social Policy and Administration36 (4): 331—45.
37.
Svallfors, S. (1997) `Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: a Comparison of Eight Western Nations', European Sociological Review13: 283—304.
38.
Will, J. (1993) `The Dimensions of Poverty: Public Perceptions of the Deserving Poor', Social Science Research22: 312—32.
