Younger Asian migrants—as interviewees and clients in the British institutional context—primarily view their confrontation with `white' gatekeepers as one between their ethnic minority status and the cultural dominance of the majority. By calling into play their migrant status more readily than their client status, they tend to interpret the perennial mismatch between their socioeconomic needs and the institutional processing of those needs in terms of negative cultural stereotyping, ahead of institutional stereotyping. My main focus in this paper is twofold: first, in order to explain why Asian migrants interpret institutional actions as discriminatory devices against their ethnicity, I appeal to the broader sociohistorical context surrounding the migration phenomenon itself; second, I draw attention to the structure of their accounts of cultural discrimination—discursively realized as strategies of consensus and contrast—in the context of gatekeeping encounters. By pointing out the limitations of an activity-based analysis of communicative mismatches in client-gatekeeper discourse, I argue that in order to account for minority groups' discursive practices it is essential that we supplement the pragmatic analysis of mismatches with a socio-psychological analysis of `self- and other-stereotyping' on the one hand and institutional and cultural stereotyping on the other hand.
Adelswärd, V. (1988) Styles of Success: On Impression Management as Collaborative Action in Job Interviews (Linköping Studies in Arts and Science 23). University of Linköping.
2.
Agar, M. (1985) `Institutional Discourse', Text5(3): 147-168.
3.
Akinnaso, N. and Ajirotutu, C. (1982) `Performance and Ethnic Style in Job Interviews', in J.J. Gumperz (ed.) Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Antaki, C. and Leudar, I. (1990) `Claim-Backing and Other Explanatory Genres in Talk', Journal of Language and Social Psychology9(4): 279-292.
5.
Ballard, R. , ed. (1994) Desh Pardesh: The South Asian Presence in Britain. London: Hurst.
6.
Banton, M. (1992) `The Nature and Causes of Racism and Racial Discrimination', International Sociology7(1): 69-84.
7.
Barker, M. (1981) The New Racism. London: Junction Books.
8.
Billig, M. (1987) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Braham, P. , Rattansi, A. and Skellington, R., eds. (1992) Racism and Antiracism: Inequalities, Opportunities and Policies. London: Sage.
10.
Brown, C. (1992) ` “Same Difference”: The Persistence of Racial Disadvantage in the British Employment Market', in P. Braham, A. Rattansi and R. Skellington (eds) Racism and Antiracism: Inequalities, Opportunities and Policies, pp. 46-63. London: Sage.
11.
Cody, M.J. and McLaughlin, M.L. (1988) `Accounts on Trial: Oral Arguments in Traffic Court', in C. Antaki (ed). Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods, pp. 113-126. London: Sage.
12.
Collins, J. (1987) `Conversation and Knowledge in Bureaucratic Settings', Discourse Processes10: 303-319.
13.
Dahya, B. (1988) `South Asians as Economic Migrants in Britain', Ethnic and Racial Studies11(4): 439-455.
14.
Donald, J. and Rattansi, A., eds (1992) Race, Culture and Difference. London: Sage, in association with The Open University.
15.
Erickson, F. (1976) `Gatekeeping Encounters: A Social Selection Process', in P. Sandy (ed.) Anthropology and Public Interest. New York: Academic Press.
16.
Erickson, F. and Schultz, J. (1982) The Counselor as Gatekeeper: Social Interaction in Interviews. New York: Academic Press.
17.
Essed, P. (1991) Understanding Everyday Racism: An Interdisciplinary Theory (Sage Series on Race and Ethnic Relations, Vol. 2). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Fairclough, N. (1985) `Critical and Descriptive Goals in Discourse Analysis', Journal of Pragmatics9: 739-763.
19.
Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
20.
Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
21.
Gumperz, J.J. , Jupp, T. and Roberts, C. (1979) Crosstalk. Southall: National Council for Industrial Language Training.
22.
Herzfeld, M. (1992) The Social Production of Indifference: Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Hewstone, M. , ed. (1983) Attribution Theory: Social and Functional Extensions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
24.
Hymes, D. (1964) `Introduction: Toward Ethnographies of Communication', American Anthropologist6: 12-25.
25.
Jenkins, R. (1986) Racism and Recruitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Klineberg, O. (1982) `Contact Between Ethnic Groups: A Historical Perspective of Some Aspects of Theory and Research', in S. Bochner (ed.) Cultures in contact: Studies in Cross-Cultural Interaction, pp. 45-55. Oxford: Pergamon.
27.
Knapp, K. , Enniinger, W. and Knapp-Potthoff A., eds (1987) Analysing Intercultural Communication. Berlin: de Gruyter.
28.
Komter, M. (1991) Conflict and Cooperation in Job Interviews: A Study of Talk, Tasks and Ideas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29.
Kress, G. (1989) Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Lallijee, M. (1987) `Attribution Theory and Intercultural Communication', in K. Knapp, W. Enniinger and A. Knapp-Potthoff (eds) Analysing Intercultural Communication, pp. 37-49. Berlin: de Gruyter.
31.
Levinson, S. (1979) `Activity Types and Language', Language17(5-6): 365-399.
32.
Linguistic Minorities Project (1985) The Other Languages of England. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
33.
McKay, S.L. and Wong, S.C., eds (1988) Language Diversity: Problem or Resource?New York: Newbury House.
34.
Martin-Jones, M. (1989) `Models and Methods in the Study of Bilingualism Among Linguistic Minorities', unpublished PhD Thesis, Stanford University, CA.
35.
Miles, R. (1989) Racism. London: Routledge.
36.
Moscovici, S. (1984) `The Phenomenon of Social Representations', in R. Farr and S. Moscovici (eds) Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Murray, A. and Sondhi, R. (1987) `Socio-Political Influences on Cross-Cultural Encounters: Notes Toward a Framework for the Analysis of Context, in K. Knapp, W. Enniinger and A. Knapp-Potthoff (eds) Analysing Intercultural Communication, pp. 17-33. Berlin: de Gruyter.
38.
Philips, S.U. (1987) `The Social Organization of Knowledge and its Consequences for Discourse in Bureaucratic Settings', Discourse Processes10(4): 429-433.
39.
Rawls, A. W. (1989) `An Ethnomethodological Perspective on Social Theory', in D. T. Helm, W. T. Anderson, A.J. Meehan and A. W. Rawls (eds) The Interactional Order: New Directions in the Study of Social Order. New York: Irvington.
40.
Roberts, C. (1989) `Good Will: Poor Decisions. Language and Discrimination in Inter-Ethnic Interviews', paper presented at the British Association for Applied Linguistics Annual Meeting, September, Lancaster.
41.
Roberts, C. and Sayers, P. (1987) `Keeping the Gate: How Judgements are Made in Interethnic Interviews', in K. Knapp, W. Enniinger and A. Knapp-Potthoff (eds) Analysing Intercultural Communication, pp. 111-135. Berlin: de Gruyter.
42.
Saifullah Khan, V. (1977) `The Pakistanis: Mirpuri Villagers at Home and in Bradford', in J.L. Watson (ed), Between Two Cultures: Migrants and Minorities in Britain. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
43.
Sarangi, S. (1990) `The Dynamics of Institutional Discourse: An Intercultural Perspective', unpublished PhD Thesis, Lancaster University, UK.
44.
Sarangi, S. (1994a) `Accounting for Mismatches in Intercultural Selection Interviews', Multilingua13(1-2): 163-194.
45.
Sarangi, S. (1994b) `Intercultural or Not? Beyond Celebration of Cultural Differences in Miscommunication Analysis', Pragmatics4(3): 409-427.
46.
Sarangi, S. and Slembrouck, S. (1992) `Non-Cooperation in Communication: A Reassessment of Gricean Pragmatics', Journal of Pragmatics17: 117-154.
47.
Sarangi, S. and Slembrouck, S. (1996) Language, Bureaucracy and Social Control. London: Longman.
48.
Smitherman-Donaldson, G. and van Dijk, T.A., eds (1988) Discourse and Discrimination. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
49.
Sykes, M. (1988) `From “Rights” to “Needs”: Official Discourse and the “Welfarization” of Race', in G. Smitherman-Donaldson and T.A. van Dijk (eds) Discourse and Discrimination, pp. 176-205. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
50.
Thomas, J. (1983) `Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure', Applied Linguistics4(2): 91-112.
51.
Turner, J.C. , Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D. and Wetherell, M.S. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
52.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1987) Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1992) `Discourse and the Denial of Racism', Discourse & Society3(1): 87-118.
54.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1993) `Stories and Racism', in D.K. Mumby (ed.) Narrative and Social Control: Critical Perspectives, pp. 121-142. London: Sage.
55.
Waugh, L.R. and Monville-Burston, M., eds (1990) On Language: Roman Jakobson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. (1992) Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
57.
Wrench, J. and Solomos, J. (1993) `The Politics and Processes of Racial Discrimination in Britain', in J. Solomos and J. Wrench (eds) Racism and Migration in Western Europe, pp.157-176. Oxford: Berg.
