Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article explores the social construction of the notion of defectiveness in broadcast evangelical discourse. The data come from the God TV (USA) and the flagship TV channel God Channel (UK). The analysis focuses on the action-orientated and rhetorical business (Potter, 1996) accomplished by employing descriptions and displays of defectiveness. Specifically, this article investigates how notions of a general ‘human’ and direct ‘personal’ defectiveness are negotiated, and for what reasons, in this particular Christian talk. The focus here is on how and what actions people perform with their talk in these environments, when doing interactional work and presenting specific versions of arguments, stories etc. (Edwards, 2005).

Keywords

broadcast evangelical discourse defectiveness discursive psychology institutional discourse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler, A. ( 1935) ‘The Structure of Neurosis’, International Journal of Industrial Psychology 2: 3-12.

Billig, M. , Condor, S. , Edwards, D. , Gane, N. , Middleton, D. and Radley, A. ( 1988) Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: Sage.

Chevalier, F. and Clift, R. ( 2008) ‘Unfinished Turns in French Conversation: Projectability, Syntax and Action’, Journal of Pragmatics 40(10): 1731-52.

Coogan, M.D. (ed.) (2001) The New Oxford Annotated Bible: With the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books, New Revised Standard Version. New York: Oxford University Press.

Edwards, D. ( 1994) ‘Script Formulations: A Study of Event Descriptions in Conversation’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13(3): 211-47.

Edwards, D. ( 1997) Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.

Edwards, D. ( 2005) ‘Discursive Psychology’, in K.L. Fitch and R.S. Sanders (eds) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, pp. 257-73. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Garfinkel, H. ( 1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge : Polity Press.

Goffman, E. ( 1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.

10.

Hay, J. ( 2001) ‘The Pragmatics of Humour Support’, International Journal of Humour Research 14(1): 55-82.

11.

Hepburn, A. ( 2003) An Introduction to Critical Social Psychology. London: Sage.

12.

Holmes, J. ( 2000) ‘Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace’, Discourse Studies 2(2): 159-85.

13.

Levine, S.R. , Wyer, R.S. and Schwarz, N. ( 1994) ‘"Are You What You Feel?" Affective and Cognitive Determinants of Self Esteem’, European Journal of Social Psychology 24: 63-77.

14.

Park, J.-E. ( 2007) ‘Co-Construction of Nonnative Speaker Identity in Cross-Cultural Interaction’, Applied Linguistics 28(3): 339-60.

15.

Pomerantz, A. ( 1984) ‘Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessment: Some Features of Preferred/ Dispreferred Turn Shapes’, in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structure of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Potter, J. ( 1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction . London: Sage.

17.

Rosenberg, M. ( 1965) Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

18.

Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. ( 1974) ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation’, Language 50(4): 696-735.

19.

Solomon, R.C. ( 2006) Dark Feelings, Grim Thoughts: Experience and Reflection in Camus and Sartre. New York: Oxford University Press.

20.

Stump, E. ( 1998) ‘Coercion and the Hiddenness of God’, in E. Stump and M. Murray (eds) Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions . Oxford: Blackwell.

21.

Thornbury, G.A. ( 2002) ‘Carl F.H. Henry as Heir of Reformation Epistemology.’ Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society.

22.

Zajdman, A. ( 1995) ‘Humourous Face-Threatening Acts: Humour as Strategy’ , Journal of Pragmatics 23: 325-39.

The production of ‘defectiveness’ as a linguistic resource in broadcast evangelical discourse: A discursive psychology approach

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References