This article presents evidence of a conspiracy theory discourse on the anonymous messaging board 4chan, specifically /pol as in politically incorrect. Previous research shows 4chan lacks a coherent political discourse. Recent research suggests that the site is at least a reliable source of white supremacism within a larger framework of conspiratorial thinking. Grounded theory guides a systematic analysis of posts from 4chan’s /pol board during the dates third to ninth January 2021, before and after the attempted insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. Following Trump’s call to supporters to Stop the Steal (referring to unsubstantiated claims of a fraudulent 2020 election), the search terms steal and Trump collected all posts in threads with matching posts. A critical discourse analysis investigates the presence and articulation of conspiracism in selected posts. Findings reveal confirmation with previous research about the apparent lack of ideological coherence on/pol yet also affirms the discourse of white supremacism. Additionally, a diversity of conspiracism functions as a primary form of communication on 4chan regardless of one’s loyalty to a particular political ideology.
AikinSF (2013) Poe’s Law, group polarization, and argumentative failure in religious and political discourse. Social Semiotics23(3): 301–317.
2.
BaeleSJBraceLCoanTG (2021) Variations on a theme? Comparing 4chan, 8kun, and other chans’ far-right “/pol” boards. Perspectives on Terrorism15(1): 65–80.
3.
BarkerK (2020) How to survive the end of the future: Preppers, pathology, and the everyday crisis of insecurity. Transactions (Institute of British Geographers: 1965)45(2): 483–496. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12362
CaianiMParentiL (2016) European and American Extreme Right Groups and the Internet. London: Routledge.
7.
Chun TieYBirksMFrancisK (2019) Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927
8.
ClarkeA (2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
ColleyTMooreM (2022) The challenges of studying 4chan and the Alt-Right: ‘Come on in the water’s fine.’New Media and Society24(1): 5–30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820948803
DafaureM (2020) The “Great Meme War:” The alt-right and its multifarious enemies. Angles: New Perspectives on the Anglophone World, 10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/angles.369
12.
de ZeeuwDHagenSPeetersS, et al. (2020) Tracing normiefication: A cross-platform analysis of the QAnon conspiracy theory. First Monday25(11): 1–41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i11.10643
13.
ElleyB (2021) “The rebirth of the West begins with you!”—Self-improvement as radicalisation on 4chan. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications8(67): 1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00732-x
14.
El-NawawyMHasanBA (2022) Terrorism, Islamophobia and white supremacy: Comparing CNN and the BBC coverage of the Christchurch mosque shooting. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research15(1): 65–85.
15.
FaircloughN (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London & New York: Longman.
16.
GjoneskaB (2021) Conspiratorial beliefs and cognitive styles: An integrated look on analytic thinking, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning in relation to (dis)trust in conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology12: 1–10. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736838
17.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
KellyCR (2016) The man-pocalpyse: Doomsday Preppers and the rituals of apocalyptic manhood. Text and Performance Quarterly36(2–3): 95–114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10462937.2016.1158415
MarwickAEPartinWC (2022) Constructing alternative facts: Populist expertise and the QAnon conspiracy. New Media and Society. DOI: 10.1177/14614448221090201
32.
McCauleyCMoskalenkoS (2008) Mechanisms of political radicalization: Pathways toward terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence20(3): 415–433.
33.
MirrleesT (2018) The alt-right’s discourse on “cultural marxism”: A political instrument of intersectional hate. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice/Études Critiques Sur Le Genre, La Culture, et La Justice39(1): 49–69.
34.
MuirheadRRosenblumNL (2019) A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
35.
PhillipsW (2018) The oxygen of amplification: Better practices for reporting on extremists, antagonists, and manipulators. Data & Society. Available at: https://datasociety.net/library/oxygen-of-amplification/ (accessed 12 September 2022).
36.
TaguieffPA (1993) From race to culture: The New Right’s view of European identity. Télos1993(98-99): 99–125. Available at: https://philpapers.org/rec/TAGFRT (accessed 25 July 2022).
37.
TagieuffP (2015) La revanche du nationalisme: Néopopulistes et xénophobes à l’assaut de l’Europe (in French). Presses Universitaires de France.
38.
TopinkaRFinlaysonAOsborne-CareyC (2021) The trap of tracking: Digital methods, surveillance, and the far right. Surveillance & Society19(3): 384–388.
WigginsBE (2021) Boogaloo and Civil War 2: Memetic antagonism in expressions of covert activism. New Media & Society23(11): 3179–3205. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820945317
45.
WodakR (2001) What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In: WodakREyerM M, (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp.26–52.
46.
ZihiriSLimaGHanJ, et al. (2022) QAnon shifts into the mainstream, remains a far-right ally. Heliyon8(2): e08764–e08767.
