Restricted accessOtherFirst published online 2008-11
'You can't do it ... it's theory rather than practice': staff use of the practice/principle rhetorical device in talk on empowering people with learning disabilities
This study explores the discourses of support staff of people with learning disabilities talking about how choices and control are promoted or denied for service-users. A semi-structured interview based on issues identified in the White Paper 'Valuing People' was administered to 15 professional care-givers of people with learning disabilities. These were transcribed and analysed using discourse analysis. The analysis demonstrated the use of two dominant discursive themes: increasing autonomy and practicalities talk. These themes were frequently mobilized together in a manner that paralleled what Wetherell et al. (1987) termed a 'practice/ principle rhetorical device,' to argue against increasing choices and control. The implications of this are discussed, as are the subject positions offered to staff and service-users.
Agich, G.J. (1993) Autonomy and Long-term Care. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press .
2.
Antaki, C. (2001) '"D'you Like a Drink Then Do You?" Dissembling Language and the Construction of an Impoverished Life' , Journal of Language and Social Psychology20: 196-213.
3.
Antaki, C. and Wetherell, M. (1999) 'Show Concessions' , Discourse Studies1: 7-27.
4.
Antaki, C. , Young, N. and Finlay, M. (2002) 'Shaping Clients' Answers: Departures from Neutrality in Care-staff Interviews with People with a Learning Disability' , Disability and Society17: 435-55.
5.
Augoustinos, M. , Tuffin, K. and Rapley, M. (1999) 'Genocide or Failure to Gel? Racism, History and Nationalism in Australian Talk' , Discourse & Society10: 351-78.
6.
Billig, M. , Condor, K. , Edwards, D. , Gane, M. , Middleton, D. and Radley, A. (1989) Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: SAGE.
7.
Bogdan, R. and Taylor, S.J. (1994). The Social Meaning of Mental Retardation. London: Teachers College Press.
8.
Booth, T. and Booth, W. (1992) 'Practice in Sexuality' , Mental Handicap20: 64-9.
9.
Burr, V. (2005) Social Constructionism. London : Routledge.
10.
Coyle, A. (2001) 'Discourse Analysis', in G.M. Breakwell , S. Hammond and C. Fife-Shaw (eds) Research Methods in Psychology . London: SAGE.
11.
Cullen, C. (1999) 'Contextualism in Intellectual Disability Research: The Case of Choice Behaviour' , Journal of Intellectual Disability Research43: 437-44.
12.
Department of Health (2001) Valuing People: A New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century . London: Department of Health.
13.
Department of Health (2005a) Mental Capacity Act. London: Department of Health. Available http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2005/ukpga_20050009_en_1
14.
Department of Health (2005b) Independence, Well Being and Choice. London: Department of Health.
15.
Dowson, S. (1997) 'Empowerment Within Services: A Comfortable Delusion' , in P. Ramcharan , G. Roberts , G. Grant and J. Borland (eds) Empowerment in Everyday Life: Learning Disability. London: Jessica Kingsley.
16.
Edwards, D. (1991) 'Categories Are For Talking: On the Cognitive and Discursive Bases of Categorization' , Theory and Psychology1: 515-42.
17.
Finlay, W. , Antaki, C. and Walton, C. (2008) 'Promoting Choice and Control in Residential Services for People with Learning Disabilities' , Disability and Society23: 349-60.
18.
Finlay, W.M.L. , Walton, C. and Antaki, C. (in press) 'A Manifesto for the Use of Video in Service Improvement and Self Development in Residential Services for People with Learning Disabilities' , British Journal of Learning Disabilities.
19.
Goffman, E. (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. London: Penguin.
20.
Goodley, D. (2000) Self Advocacy in the Lives of People with Learning Difficulties. Buckingham: Open University Press.
21.
Harris, J. (2003) 'Time to Make Up Your Mind: Why Choosing is Difficult' , British Journal of Learning Disabilities31: 3-8.
22.
Hewitt, J.P. and Stokes, R. (1975) 'Disclaimers' , American Psychological Review40: 1-11.
23.
Horton-Salway, M. (2001) 'The Construction of ME: The Discursive Action Model', in M. Wetherell , S. Taylor and S.J. Yates (eds) Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London: SAGE.
24.
Jenkinson, J.C. (1993) 'Who Shall Decide? The Relevance of Theory and Research to Decision-making by People with an Intellectual Disability' , Disability, Handicap and Society8: 361-75.
25.
Jingree, T. , Finlay, W.M.L. and Antaki, C. (2006) 'Empowering Words, Disempowering Actions: An Analysis of Interactions Between Staff Members and People with Learning Disabilities in Residents' Meetings' , Journal of Intellectual Disability Research50: 212-26.
26.
Oliver, M. (1996) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
27.
Peräkylä, A. and Vehviläinen, S. (2003) 'Conversation Analysis and the Professional Stocks of Interactional Knowledge' , Discourse & Society14: 727-50.
28.
Peter, D. (2000) 'Dynamics of Discourse: A Case Study Illuminating Power Relations in Mental Retardation' , Mental Retardation38: 354-62.
29.
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: SAGE.
30.
Ramcharan, P. and Borland, J. (1997) 'Preface', in P. Ramcharan , G. Roberts , G. Grant and J. Borland (eds) Empowerment in Everyday Life: Learning Disability . London: Jessica Kingsley.
31.
Ramcharan, P. , Roberts, G. , Grant, G. and Borland, J. (1997) Empowerment in Everyday Life: Learning Disability . London: Jessica Kingsley.
32.
Rapley, M. (2004) The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Rapley, M. and Antaki, C. (1996) 'A Conversation Analysis of the Acquiescence of People with Learning Disabilities' , Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology6: 207-27.
34.
Speer, S.A. (2002) 'Sexist Talk: Gender Categories, Participants' Orientation and Irony' , Journal of Sociolinguistics6: 347-77.
35.
Thompson, S.A. (2003) 'Subversive Political Praxis: Supporting Choice, Power and Control for People with Learning Difficulties' , Disability & Society18: 719-36.
36.
Van Hooren, R.H. , Widdershoven, G.A.M. , Van den Borne, H.W. and Curfs, L .M.G. (2001 ) 'Autonomy and Intellectual Disability: The Case of Prevention of Obesity in Prader-Willi Syndrome', Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 46: 560-8.
37.
Walmsley, J. (1999) 'Community and People with Learning Difficulties' , in J. Swain and S. French (eds) Therapy and Learning Difficulties: Advocacy, Participation and Partnership. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
38.
Wertsch, J. (2006) 'The Multivoicedness of Meaning', in M. Wetherell , S. Taylor and S.J. Yates (eds) Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: SAGE.
39.
Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. (1992) Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.
40.
Wetherell, M. , Stiven, H. and Potter, J. (1987) 'Unequal Egalitarianism: A Preliminary Study of Discourses Concerning Gender and Employment Opportunities' , British Journal of Social Psychology26: 59-71.
41.
Wetherell, M. , Taylor, S. and Yates, S.J. (2001) Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London: SAGE.
42.
Wilcox, E. , Finlay, W.M.L. and Edmonds, J. (2006) '"His Brain is Totally Different": An Analysis of Care Staff Explanations of Aggressive Challenging Behaviour and the Impact of Gendered Discourses' , British Journal of Social Psychology45: 197-216.
43.
Williams, V. (2005) '"Did You Solve It Yourself ?" : Evaluation of Narratives of Self-identity by People with Learning Disabilities' , Communication and Medicine2: 77-89.
44.
Young, R. (1980) 'Autonomy and Socialisation' , Mind89: 565-76.
