When police officers interview people with intellectual disabilities who allege sexual assault and rape, they must establish rapport with the interviewee but deal with their distress in a way that does not compromise the interview’s impartiality and its acceptability in court. Inspection of 19 videotaped interviews from an English police force’s records reveals that the officers deal with expressed distress by choosing among three practices: minimal (e.g. okay) or no acknowledgement, acknowledging the expressed emotion as a matter of the complainant’s difficulty in proceeding (e.g. take your time) and rarely (and only if the complainants were apparently unable to resume their talk) explicit reference to their emotion (e.g. it’s obviously upsetting for you). We discuss these practices as ways of managing the conflicting demands of rapport and evidence-gathering.
AntakiCJahodaA (2010) Psychotherapists’ practices in keeping a session ‘on-track’ in the face of clients’ ‘off-track’ talk. Communication and Medicine7: 11–21.
2.
ClareICHGudjonssonGH (1993) Interrogative suggestibility, confabulation, and acquiescence in people with mild learning disabilities (mental handicap): Implications for reliability during police interrogations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology32: 295–301.
3.
CurlTSDrewP (2008) Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction41: 129–153.
4.
DrewPToerienMIrvineA. (2014) Personal adviser interviews with benefits claimants in UK jobcentres. Research on Language and Social Interaction47: 306–316.
5.
DriessenJJ (1997) Worldly interpretations of a suspicious story. Ethnographic Studies2: 3–15.
6.
GoodwinMHCekaiteAGoodwinC. (2012) Emotion as stance. In: PeräkyläASorjonenM-L (eds) Emotion in Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 16–41.
7.
HepburnA (2004) Crying: Notes on description, transcription and interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction37: 251–290.
8.
HepburnAPotterJ (2007) Crying receipts: Time, empathy, and institutional practice. Research on Language and Social Interaction40: 89–116.
9.
HepburnAPotterJ (2012) Crying and crying responses. In: PeräkyläASorjonenM-L (eds) Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195–211.
10.
HepburnAWilkinsonSButlerCW (2014) Intervening with conversation analysis in telephone helpline services: Strategies to improve effectiveness. Research on Language and Social Interaction47: 239–254.
11.
HeritageJ (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–345.
12.
HeritageJ (2012a) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45: 1–29.
13.
HeritageJ (2012b) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45: 30–52.
14.
HeritageJLindströmA (2012) Knowledge, empathy and emotion in a medical encounter. In: PeräkyläASorjonenM-L (eds) Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 256–273.
15.
LeaSLanversUShawS (2003) Attrition in rape cases: Developing a profile and identifying relevant factors. British Journal of Criminology43: 583–599.
16.
LindströmASorjonenM-L (2013) Affiliation in conversation. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley, pp. 350–369.
17.
McEachernAG (2012) Sexual abuse of individuals with disabilities: Prevention strategies for clinical practice. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse21(4): 386–398.
18.
MacLeodNJ (2010) Police interviews with women reporting rape: A critical discourse analysis. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Aston University, Birmingham.
19.
MaynardDHeritageJ (2005) Conversation analysis, doctor–patient interaction and medical communication. Medical Education39: 428–435.
20.
ParkY (2014) The roles of third-turn repeats in two L2 classroom interactional contexts. Applied Linguistics35: 145–167.
21.
PetersiliaJR (2001) Crime victims with developmental disabilities: A review essay. Criminal Justice and Behavior28: 655–694.
22.
PudlinskiC (2005) Doing empathy and sympathy: Caring responses to troubles tellings on a peer support line. Discourse Studies7: 267–288.
23.
RobinsonJDHeritageJ (2014) Intervening with conversation analysis: The case of medicine. Research on Language and Social Interaction47: 201–218.
24.
RomaniukT (2013) Pursuing answers to questions in broadcast journalism. Research on Language and Social Interaction46: 144–164.
25.
RowsellWLClareICHMurphyG (2013) The psychological impact of abuse on men and women with severe intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities26: 257–270.
26.
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2014) Forensic Care Pathways for Adults with Intellectual Disability Involved with the Criminal Justice System. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.
27.
RuusuvuoriJ (2005) ‘Empathy’ and ‘sympathy’ in action: Attending to patients’ troubles in Finnish homeopathic and general practice consultations. Social Psychology Quarterly68: 204–222.
28.
RuusuvuoriJ (2007) Managing affect: Integration of empathy and problem-solving in healthcare encounters. Discourse Studies9: 597–622.
29.
SidnellJStiversT (eds) (2012) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Blackwell-Wiley.
30.
StevanovicMPeräkyläA (2014) Three orders in the organization of human action and social relations: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction. Language in Society43: 185–207.
31.
StokoeEH (2014) The Conversation-Analytic Role-Play Method (CARM): A method for training communication skills as an alternative to simulated role-play. Research on Language and Social Interaction47: 255–264.
WilkinsonR (2014) Conversation analysis and intervention in speech and language therapy: Improving aphasic conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction47: 219–238.
