In a qualitative study of 50 hours of videotapes of interactions between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities, in two different service environments, we identified conversational practices that arguably promoted – or failed to promote – a discourse of service-users’ personal agency in how they carried out everyday activities. Staff could treat the service-user as an autonomous, self-directed social individual by (a) casting the activity in which they were engaged as being located in a meaningful overall framework, (b) designing their turns at talk as suggestions and requests for the service-user to follow as a matter of choice and (c) implying a joint purpose shared between service-user and a larger group in which he or she was a stakeholder. We discuss these findings in light of recent developments in the drive to empower service-users who have intellectual disabilities.
AntakiCKentA (2012) Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments. Journal of Pragmatics44: 876–889.
3.
AntakiCFinlayWMLWaltonC (2009) Choice for people with an intellectual impairment in official discourse and in practice. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities6(4): 260–266.
4.
AntakiCFinlayWMLWaltonC. (2015) Communicative practices in staff support of adults with intellectual disabilities. In: O’ReillyMLesterJ (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Mental Health. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
5.
British Institute of Learning Disabilities (2009) Factsheet: Advocacy. Birmingham: BILD.
6.
British Psychological Society (BPS) (2000) Learning Disability: Definitions and Contexts. Leicester: BPS.
7.
CambridgePCarnabyS (eds) (2005) Person Centred Planning and Care Management with People with Learning Disabilities. London: Jessica Kingsley.
8.
CravenAPotterJ (2010) Directives: Contingency and entitlement in action. Discourse Studies12: 1–24.
9.
CurlTSDrewP (2008) Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction41(2): 129–153.
10.
Department of Health (2001) Valuing People: A New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century. London: HMSO.
FinlayWMLWaltonCAntakiC (2008) A manifesto for the use of video in service improvement and staff development in residential services for people with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities36: 227–231.
14.
HeritageJ (2012) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 30–52.
15.
JohnsonK (2013) The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A framework for ethical and inclusive practice?Ethics and Social Welfare7: 218–231.
MühlhäuslerPHarréR (1990) Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
18.
PowerA (2011) Understanding the complex negotiations in fulfilling the right to independent living for disabled people. Disability and Society28: 204–217.
19.
RapleyM (2004) The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
RoutledgeMSandersonH (2001) Planning with People: Towards Person-centred Approaches (Guidance for Implementation Groups). London: Department of Health.
21.
SempikJAldridgeJBeckerS (2005) Health, Well-being and Social Inclusion: Therapeutic Horticulture in the UK. Bristol: The Policy Press.
22.
ShakespeareT (2013) Disability Rights and Wrongs, 2nd edn.Abingdon: Routledge.
23.
SimsonSStrausMC (2003) Horticulture as Therapy: Principles and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
24.
StevanovicMSvennevigJ (2015) Introduction: Epistemics and deontics in conversational directives. Journal of Pragmatics78: 1–6.
25.
TasséMJSchalockRLBalboniG. (2012) The construct of adaptive behavior: Its conceptualization, measurement, and use in the field of intellectual disability. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities117(4): 291–303.
26.
United Nations (UN) (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. UN General Assembly adopted by consensus the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol 13 December 2006. New York. Available at: http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=150 (accessed 22 March 2015).
27.
WehmeyerMLBoldingN (2001) Enhanced self-determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments. Journal of Intellectual Disability45: 371–383.
28.
WilliamsV (2011) Disability and Discourse. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
