This article focuses on frame conflicts in workplace interactions and their role in the sociodiscursive reproduction of social inequality. Specifically, I analyse the frame conflicts that arise when customers mobilize local discursive patterns, code-switching and conversational topics. I observe how these local communicative means, which are considered to be of lesser value on the linguistic market, struggle when matched against the institutional and depersonalized discursive style of the professionals. The research is based on employee/customer interviews recorded at a partly state-owned enterprise that supplies water, sewage treatment and waste collection in a borough in Galicia (Spain). The data have been subjected to sociodiscursive, sequential and critical analyses. This multimethod aproach has enabled us to observe the way in which social order is built up from interactional order, revealing the role played by frames, linguistic resources and interactional asymmetry in reproducing the power differences that separate institutions and citizens.
Agar, M. (1985) `Institutional Discourse', Text5(3): 147—68.
2.
Álvarez-Cáccamo, C. (1996) `Building Alliances in Political Discourse: Language, Institutional Authority, and Resistance', Folia LinguisticaXXX (3—4): 245—70.
3.
Álvarez-Cáccamo, C. (1998) `From “Switching Code” to “Codeswitching”: Towards a Reconceptualisation of Communicative Codes', in P. Auer (ed.) Code-Switching in Conversation. Language, Interaction and Identity, pp. 29—48. London: Routledge.
4.
Álvarez-Cáccamo, C. (2000) `Para um Modelo do “Code-switching” e a Alternância de Variedades como Fenómenos Distintos: Dados do Discurso Galego-Português/Espanhol na Galiza', Estudios de Sociolingüística1(1): 111—28.
5.
Álvarez—Cáccamo, C. and Prego-Vázquez, G. (2003) `Political Cross-discourse: Conversationalization, Imaginary Networks, and Social Fields in Galiza', Pragmatics13(1): 145—62.
6.
Auer, P. (1998) `Learning How to Play the Game: An Investigation of Role-played Job Interviews in East Germany', Text18(1): 7—38.
7.
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. and Harris, S. (eds) (1997) The Languages of Business. An International Perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
8.
Bergmann, J.R. (1992) `Veiled Morality: Notes on Discretion in Psychiatry ', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 137—62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Bernstein, B. (1972) `A Sociolinguistic Approach to Socialization; With Some Reference to Educability', in J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics, pp. 465—97. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
10.
Blommaert, J. (2001) `Context is/as Critique', Critique of Anthropology21(1): 13—32.
11.
Blommaert, J., Collins, J. , Heller, M., Rampton, B., Slembrouck, S. and Verschueren, J. (eds) (2001) `Discourse and Critique', Critique of Anthropology21(1) [Special Issue].
12.
Blommaert, J., Collins, J. , Heller, M., Rampton, B., Slembrouck, S. and Verschueren, J. (eds) (2003) `Ethnography, Discourse, and Hegemony', Pragmatics13(1) [Special Issue].
13.
Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
Briggs, Ch. (1997) `Notes on a “Confession”. On the Construction of Gender, Sexuality, and Violence in an Infanticide Case', Pragmatics7(4): 519—46.
15.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Chafe, W. (1977) `Creativity in Verbalization and its Implications for the Nature of Stored Knowledge', in R.O. Freedle (ed.) Discourse Production and Comprehension, pp. 41—55. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17.
Clayman, S.E. (1992) `Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News-inter view Discourse', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 163—98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Codó Olsina, E. (2003) The Struggle for Meaning. Inmigration and Mutilingual Talk in an Institutional Setting. PhD disser tation, Depar tament de Filologia Anglesa i de Germanística. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona .
19.
Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992a) `Analysing Talk at Work: An Introduction', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.) Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 3—65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1992b) Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Drew, P. and Sor jonen, M.-L. (2000) `Diálogo Institucional ', in T.A. Van Dijk (ed.) El Discurso como Interacción Social, pp. 141—78. Barcelona : Gedisa.
22.
Duranti, A. and Goodwin, Ch. (1992) Rethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Fairclough, N. (1997) `Discurso, Mudança e Hegemonia', in E.R. Pedro (ed.) Análise Crítica do Discurso. Uma perspectiva sociopolítica e funcional, pp. 75—103. Lisbon : Caminho.
24.
Fillmore, Ch. (1975) `An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning ', in Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, pp. 123—31. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Human Learning, University of California Berkeley.
25.
Fisher, S. and Todd, A.D. (eds) (1986) Discourse and Institutional Authority: Medicine, Education, and Law. Vol. XIX, Advances in Discourse Processes . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26.
Gallardo Paúls, B. (1996) Análisis Conversacional y Pragmática del Receptor . Valencia: Episteme.
27.
Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
29.
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gumperz, J.J. (1982a) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Gumperz, J.J. (ed.) (1982b). Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Gumperz, J.J. (1992) `Contextualization and Under standing.', in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, pp. 229—52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Gumperz, J.J. (1996) `The Linguistic and Cultural Relativity of Conversational Inference', in J.J. Gumperz and S.C. Levinson (eds) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, pp. 374—406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds) (1972) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
35.
Gumperz, J.J., Jupp, T. and Roberts, C. (1979) Crosstalk: A Study of Cross-Cultural Communication . London: National Centre for Industrial Language Training in association with the BBC.
36.
Gunnarson, B. (2000) `Análisis aplicado del discurso', in T. Van Dijk (ed.) El discurso como interacción social, pp. 405—41. Barcelona: Gedisa .
37.
Gunnarson, B., Linnel, P. and Nordberg, B. (1997) The Construction of Prof fessional Discourse. London: Longman.
38.
Heller, M. (1999) Linguistic Minorities and Modernity. A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. London: Longman.
39.
Heller, M. (2001) `Critique and Sociolinguistic Analysis of Discour se', Critique of Anthropology21(2): 117—41.
40.
Heller, M. (2002) Éléments d'une Sociolinguitique Critique. Paris: Didier.
41.
Heller, M. (2003) `Actors and Discourses in the Construction of Hegemony ', Pragmatics13(1): 11—32.
42.
Heritage, J. and Greatbatch, D. (1991) `On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interview Interaction', in D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and Social Structure. Studies in Ethnomethology and Conversation Analysis, pp. 97—137. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
Hymes, D. (1996) Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative: Toward an Understanding of Voice. London: Taylor and Francis.
44.
Iedema, R. and Wodak, R. (1999) `Introduction: Organizational Discourses and Practices ', Discourse and Society10(1): 5—9.
45.
Jacquemet, M. (2001) `Conflict', in A. Duranti (ed.) Key Terms in Language and Culture, pp. 37—40. Oxford: Blackwell.
46.
Labov, W. (1966) The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguitics.
47.
Lakoff, G. (2003) `Framing the Dems: How Conservatives Control Political Debate and How Progressives Can Take it Back', The American Prospect, September 1. Available: http://www.prospect.org/print/V14/8/index.html.
48.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
49.
Mar tín-Rojo, L. and Góme z-Esteban, C. (2002) `Discourse at Work: When Women Take on the Role of Manager', in R. Wodak and G. Weiss (eds) Theory and Interdisciplinarity, pp. 241—71. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
Morales López, E., Prego-Vázquez, G. and Domínguez Seco, L. (2005) `Interviews Between Employees and Customers During a Company Restructuring Process', Discourse and Society16(2): 225—68.
51.
Morales Lópe z, E., Prego-Vázque z, G. and Domíngue z Seco, L. (2006) El Conf licto Comunicativo en las Empresas Desde el Análisis del Discurso . A Coruña: Universidad La Coruña .
52.
Mumby, D.K. and Clair, R.P. (2000) `El Discurso en las Organizaciones', in T. Van Dijk (ed.) El Discurso como Interacción Social, pp. 263—96. Barcelona: Gedisa .
53.
Pan, Y., Scollon, W.S. and Scollon, R. (2002) Professional Communication in International Settings . Oxford: Blackwell.
54.
Prego-Vázque z, G. (1998) Una Aproximación Sociointeraccional al Género Discursivo del Regateo. Negociando Precio e Identidades en los Mercados Gallegos. Lynx. Documentos de Trabajo 17. Valencia: Depar tament de Teoria dels Llenguatges, Universitat de València.
55.
Roberts, C. and Sarangi, S. (1999) `Hybridity in Gatekeeping Discourse: Issues of Practical Relevance for the Researcher', in S. Sarangi and C. Roberts (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Managements Settings, pp. 473—505. Berlin: Gruyter .
56.
Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (eds) (1999a) Talk, Work and Institutional Order. Discourse in Medial, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Gruyter.
57.
Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (1999b) `The Dynamics of Interactional and Institutional Orders in Work-related Settings', in S. Sarangi and C. Roberts (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discoure in Medical, Mediation and Managements Settings, pp. 1—57. Berlin: de Gruyter .
58.
Sarangi, S. and Slembrouck, S. (1996) Language, Bureaucacy and Social Control. London: Longman.
59.
Silverstein, M. and Urban, G. (1996) Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
Tannen, D. (1993) `Introduction', in D. Tannen (ed.) Framing in Discourse, pp. 3—13. New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
Tannen, D. and Wallat, C. (1993) `Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview', in D. Tannen (ed.) Framing in Discourse, pp. 57—76. New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
Telles Ribeiro, B. (1996) `Conflict Talk in a Psychiatric Discharge Inteview. Struggling Between Personal and Official Footings', in C.R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds) Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, pp. 179—93. London: Routledge .
63.
Telles Ribeiro, B. and Hoyle, S. (2000) `Frame Analysis', in J. Verschueren, J. Östman, J. Blommaert and Ch. Bulcaen (eds) Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
64.
Thornborrow, J. (2002) Power Talk. Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Longman.
65.
Todd, A. (1983) `A Diagnosis of Doctor Patient Discourse in the Prescription of Contraception', in S. Fisher and A.D. Todd (eds) The Social Organization of Doctor—Patient Communication, pp. 159—88. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
66.
Tusón Valls, A. (1997) Análisis de la Conversación. Barcelona: Ariel.
67.
Tusón, A. and Unamuno, V. (1999) `¿De qué Estamos Hablando? El Malentendido en el Discurso Escolar', Discurso and Sociedad1(1): 35—53.
68.
Urban, G. (1996) `Entextualization, Replication and Power', in M. Silverstein and G. Urban (eds) Natural Histories of Discourse, pp. 21—44. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE.
70.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2003) `La Multidisciplinariedad del Análisis Crítico del Discurso: un Alegato en Favor de la Diversidad', in R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds) Métodos de análisis Crítico de Discurso, pp. 143—76. Madrid: Gedisa.
71.
Wodak, R. (1996) Disorders of Discourse. London : Longman.
72.
Wodak, R. (2000) `La Sociolingüística Necesita una Teoría Social? Nuevas Perspectivas en el Análisis Crítico del discurso', Discurso and Sociedad2(3): 123—47.
73.
Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds) (2001) Methods of Critical DiscourseAnalysis. London: SAGE.
