In this article, we focus on problem solving talk in the business meeting event. We zoom in on the processes of formulating, negotiating and ratifying an issue as a problem, and we argue that individuals negotiate their stances in relation to their perceived/projected professional roles. The processes of problem-solving are, simultaneously, processes of self/other positioning. We take an Interactional Sociolinguistic perspective and draw on audio-recorded meeting talk collected in a multinational corporate workplace. Our analysis shows that interactants draw on issues of accountability, perceived/projected responsibilities and expertise in pursuit of their own interactional agenda in the problem-solving meeting. We close the article with directions for further research.
AhernTLeavyBByrnePJ (2014) Knowledge formation and learning in the management of projects: A problem solving perspective. International Journal of Project Management32(8): 1423–1431.
2.
AlbyFZucchermaglioC (2006) ‘Afterwards we can understand what went wrong, but now let’s fix it’: How situated work practices shape group decision making. Organization Studies27(7): 943–966.
3.
AngouriJ (2012) Managing disagreement in problem solving meeting talk. Journal of Pragmatics44(12): 1565–1579.
4.
AngouriJ (2018) Culture, Discourse, and the Workplace. Cincinnati, OH: Routledge.
5.
AngouriJBargiela-ChiappiniF (2011) ‘So what problems bother you and you are not speeding up your work?’ Problem solving talk at work. Discourse & Communication5(3): 209–229.
6.
AngouriJMondadaL (2017) Meetings. In: WodakRForchtnerB (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. New York; Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 468–484.
7.
AsmußB (2011) Proposing shared knowledge as a means of pursuing agreement. In: StiversTMondadaLSteensigJ (eds) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 207–234.
8.
AsmußBOshimaS (2012) Negotiation of entitlement in proposal sequences. Discourse Studies14(1): 67–86.
9.
BaerMDirksKTNickersonJA (2013) Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management Journal34(2): 197–214.
10.
BarnesR (2007) Formulations and the facilitation of common agreement in meetings talk. Text & Talk27(3): 273–296.
11.
BergerPLLuckmannT (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.New York; London: Penguin Books.
12.
BirkinshawJAmbosTCBouquetC (2017) Boundary spanning activities of corporate HQ executives insights from a longitudinal study. Journal of Management Studies54(4): 422–454.
13.
BlommaertJJieD (2010) Ethnographic Fieldwork: A Beginner’s Guide. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
14.
BodenD (1994) The Business of Talk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
BodenD (1997) Temporal frames: Time and talk in organizations. Time & Society6(1): 5–33.
16.
ChiaR (1996) Organizational Analysis as Deconstructive Practice, vol. 77. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
17.
CicourelAV (1988) Text and context: Cognitive, linguistic, and organizational dimensions in international negotiations. Negotiation Journal4(3): 257–266.
18.
CliftonJ (2006) A conversation analytical approach to business communication: The case of leadership. Journal of Business Communication43(3): 202–219.
19.
DrewP (2003) Comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different institutional settings: A sketch. In: Mandelbaum J, Glenn PJ and LeBaron CD Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 293–308.
20.
Du BoisJW (2007) The stance triangle. In: RobertE (ed.) Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction.Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 139–182.
21.
FraserB (2009) Topic orientation markers. Journal of Pragmatics41(5): 892–898.
22.
GeorgakopoulouA (2007) Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
23.
GeppertMDörrenbächerC (2014) Politics and power within multinational corporations: Mainstream studies, emerging critical approaches and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews16(2): 226–244.
24.
GeppertMDörrenbächerC (2016) Advancing research on political issues in and around multinational corporations. In: Becker-RitterspachFBlazejewskiSDörrenbächerCet al. (eds) Micropolitics in the Multinational Corporation: Foundations, Applications and New Directions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 243–254.
25.
GumperzJ (2015) Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In: TannenDHamiltonHSchiffrinD (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn.Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 309–323.
26.
HalkowskiT (1990) ‘Role’ as an interactional device. Social Problems37(4): 564–577.
27.
HalvorsenKSarangiS (2015) Team decision-making in workplace meetings: The interplay of activity roles and discourse roles. Journal of Pragmatics76: 1–14.
28.
HaynesR (2018) The role of expatriate managers within foreign subsidiaries: A micro-level examination. In: European international business academy, Vienna, 2–4December.
29.
HeinemannT (2008) Questions of accountability: Yes – no interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discourse Studies10(1): 55–71.
30.
HenriksenTD (2008) Liquidating roles and crystallising positions: Investigating the road between role and positioning theory. In: MoghaddamFMHarréRLeeN (eds) Global Conflict Resolution through Positioning Analysis. New York; London: Springer, pp. 41–64.
31.
HeritageJ (2012) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 1–29.
32.
HeritageJWatsonR (1979) Formulations as conversational objects. In: PsathasG (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 123–162.
33.
HolmesJStubbeM (2015) Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work, 2nd edn.London: Pearson.
34.
HuismanM (2001) Decision-making in meetings as talk-in-interaction. International Studies of Management and Organization31: 69–90.
35.
JaffeA (2014) Anthropological analysis in sociolinguistics. In: HolmesJHazenK (eds) Research Methods in Sociolinguistics: A Practical Guide. London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 213–229.
36.
LocalJ (2004) Getting back to prior talk: And-uh (m) as a back-connecting device. In:Couper-KuhlenECeciliaEF (eds) Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-Linguistic Studies of Phonetics and Prosody for Conversation. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 377–400.
37.
MarraMAngouriJ (2011) Investigating the negotiation of identity: A view from the field of workplace discourse. In: AngouriJMarraM (eds) Constructing Identities at Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–14.
38.
MåseideP (2007) Discourses of collaborative medical work. Text & Talk27(5–6): 611–632.
39.
MondadaL (2012) Video analysis and the temporality of inscriptions within social interaction: The case of architects at work. Qualitative Research12(3): 304–333.
40.
MudambiRPedersenTAnderssonU (2014) How subsidiaries gain power in multinational corporations. Journal of World Business49(1): 101–113.
41.
OchsE (1996) Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
OrlikowskiWJYatesJ (2002) It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science13(6): 684–700.
43.
PosenHEKeilTKimSet al. (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search – A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Annals12: 208–251.
44.
RašulaJVukšićVBŠtembergerMI (2012) The impact of knowledge management on organisational performance. Economic and Business Review for Central and South-Eastern Europe14(2): 147.
45.
RaymondG (2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review68(6): 939–967.
46.
ReddyMCDourishPPrattW (2006) Temporality in medical work: Time also matters. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)15(1): 29–53.
47.
RobertsC (2010) Language socialization in the workplace. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics30: 211–227.
48.
SarangiS (2010) Reconfiguring self/identity/status/role: The case of professional role performance in healthcare encounters. In: ArchibaldJGarzoneG (eds) Actors, Identities and Roles in Professional and Academic Settings: Discursive Perspectives. Berne: Peter Lang, pp. 27–54.
49.
SarangiS (2011) Role hybridity in professional practice. In: SarangiSPoleseVCaliendoG (eds) Genre(S) on the Move: Hybridisation and Discourse Change in Specialised Communication. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italianep, pp. 271–296.
50.
SarangiS (2012) Owning responsible actions/selves: Role-relational trajectories in counselling for childhood genetic testing. Journal of Applied Linguistics & Professional Practice9(3): 295–318.
51.
SarangiS (2016) Activity types, discourse types and role types: Interactional hybridity in professional-client encounters. In: MillerDRBayleyP (eds) Hybridity in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Grammar, Text and Discursive Context. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing, pp. 154–177.
52.
SarangiSRobertsC (1999) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
53.
SchiffrinD (1987) Discourse Markers.New York: Cambridge University Press.
54.
SimpsonBCarrollB (2008) Re-viewing ‘role’in processes of identity construction. Organization15(1): 29–50.
55.
SteinhardtSBJacksonSJ (2014) Reconciling rhythms: Plans and temporal alignment in collaborative scientific work. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Baltimore, MD, 15–19 February, pp. 134–145. New York: ACM.
56.
StevanovicMPeräkyläA (2012) Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language & Social Interaction45(3): 297–321.
57.
StiversT (2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction41(1): 31–57.
58.
StiversTMondadaLSteensigJ (2011) Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In: StiversTMondadaLSteensigJ (eds) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–24.
59.
SutinenM (2014) Negotiating favourable conditions for resuming suspended activities. In: HaddingtonPKeisanenTMondadaLet al (eds) Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond multitasking. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 137–166.
60.
Van de SandeCCGreenoJG (2012) Achieving alignment of perspectival framings in problem-solving discourse. Journal of the Learning Sciences21(1): 1–44.
