Patients with dizziness and unsteadiness are commonly prescribed gaze stability exercises at varying target distances to manage vestibular impairments but lack objective tools to monitor progress. Maintaining gaze stability during head motion at near distances demands greater eye velocity relative to head velocity due to vergence and increased translational eye rotation demands.
Objectives
This study compared dynamic visual acuity (DVA) during yaw and pitch at both near and far distances in patients and healthy controls.
Methods
This study includes individuals with unilateral vestibular deafferentation (UVD), veterans with dizziness yet healthy vestibular function, and healthy controls. The computerized DVA at near (50 cm) and far (200 cm) distances were collected. Data analysis included comparisons of near and far DVA in yaw and pitch planes.
Results
A total of 94 participants (34 UVD, 24 veterans with dizziness, 36 controls) were included. Near-distance DVA was significantly worse than far-distance DVA for the entire sample and within each group (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Near-distance DVA is more challenging than far-distance DVA across populations and planes of head rotation. Near-distance DVA may serve as a robust measure of vestibulo-ocular reflex function and offers a practical means for patients to self-monitor the effects of gaze stability training.
VersinoMColnaghiSCoralloG, et al.The functional head impulse test: comparing gain and percentage of correct answers. Prog Brain Res2019; 248: 241–248.
2.
SchubertMCMigliaccioAANgTWC, et al.The under-compensatory roll aVOR does not affect dynamic visual acuity. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol2012; 13(4): 517–525.
3.
ChenGZhangJQiaoQ, et al.Advances in dynamic visual acuity test research. Front Neurol2022; 13: 1047876.
4.
GuinandNVan de BergRCavuscensS, et al.Restoring visual acuity in dynamic conditions with a vestibular implant. Front Neurosci2016; 10: 577.
5.
RamaioliCCuturiLFRamatS, et al.Vestibulo-ocular responses and dynamic visual acuity during horizontal rotation and translation. Front Neurol2019; 10: 321.
6.
DannenbaumEPaquetNChilingaryanG, et al.Clinical evaluation of dynamic visual acuity in subjects with unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Otol Neurotol2009; 30(3): 368–372.
7.
DannenbaumEPaquetNHakim-ZadehR, et al.Optimal parameters for the clinical test of dynamic visual acuity in patients with a unilateral vestibular deficit. J Otolaryngol2005; 34(1): 13–19.
8.
HerdmanSJTusaRJBlattP, et al.Computerized dynamic visual acuity test in the assessment of vestibular deficits. Am J Otol1998; 19(6): 790–796.
9.
SchubertMCHerdmanSJTusaRJ. Vertical dynamic visual acuity in normal subjects and patients with vestibular hypofunction. Otol Neurotol2002; 23(3): 372–377.
10.
LiCBeaumontJLRineRM, et al.Normative scores for the NIH toolbox dynamic visual acuity test from 3 to 85 years. Front Neurol2014; 5: 223.
11.
SchubertMCMigliaccioAADella SantinaCC. Dynamic visual acuity during passive head thrusts in canal planes. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol2006; 7(4): 329–338.
12.
BaydanMCaliskanHBalam-YavuzB, et al.The interaction between mild cognitive impairment with vestibulo-ocular reflex, dynamic visual acuity and postural balance in older adults. Exp Gerontol2020; 130: 110785.
13.
HonakerJAShepardNT. Use of the Dynamic Visual Acuity Test as a screener for community-dwelling older adults who fall. J Vestib Res2011; 21(5): 267–276.
14.
SchubertMCMigliaccioAAClendanielRA, et al.Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2008; 89(3): 500–507.
15.
HallCDHerdmanSJWhitneySL, et al.Vestibular rehabilitation for peripheral vestibular hypofunction: an updated clinical practice guideline from the academy of neurologic physical therapy of the American physical therapy association. J Neurol Phys Ther2022; 46: 118–177.
16.
KirazliGErbekHS. A comparison of the video head impulse test and the functional head impulse test in chronic unilateral vestibular loss. J Laryngol Otol2024; 138(1): 43–51.
17.
ChangT-PSchubertMC. Convergence vestibulo-ocular reflex in unilateral vestibular hypofunction: behavioral evidence in support of a novel gaze stability exercise. J Neurol Phys Ther2021; 45: 3.
18.
Chen-HuangCMcCreaRA. Effects of viewing distance on the responses of vestibular neurons to combined angular and linear vestibular stimulation. J Neurophysiol1999; 81(5): 2538–2557.
19.
ViirreETweedDMilnerK, et al.A reexamination of the gain of the vestibuloocular reflex. J Neurophysiol1986; 56(2): 439–450.
20.
PetersBTBloombergJJ. Dynamic visual acuity using ‘far’ and ‘near’ targets. Acta Otolaryngol2005; 125(4): 353–357.
21.
HalmagyiGMChenLMacDougallHG, et al.The video head impulse test. Front Neurol2017; 8: 258.
22.
EkelandAGBowesAFlottorpS. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inf2010; 79(11): 736–771.
23.
HoppesCWLambertKHWhitneySL, et al.Leveraging technology for vestibular assessment and rehabilitation in the operational environment: a scoping review. Bioengineering2024; 11(2): 117.
24.
García-MuñozÁCarbonell-BoneteSCacho-MartínezP. Symptomatology associated with accommodative and binocular vision anomalies. Journal of Optometry2014; 7(4): 178–192.
25.
OwensDAWolf-KellyK. Near work, visual fatigue, and variations of oculomotor tonus. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci1987; 28(4): 743–749.
26.
VargasVRadnerWAllanBD, et al.Methods for the study of near, intermediate vision, and accommodation: an overview of subjective and objective approaches. Surv Ophthalmol2019; 64(1): 90–100.
27.
AzamiMFushikiHTsunodaR, et al.Clinical features of persistent postural-perceptual dizziness with isolated otolith dysfunction as revealed by VEMP and vHIT findings. Front Neurol2023; 14: 1129569.
28.
KimYKangBCYooMH, et al.Differential involvement of lateral semicircular canal and otolith organs in common vestibular disorders. Front Neurol2022; 13: 819385.
29.
MurofushiTNishimuraKTsubotaM. Isolated otolith dysfunction in persistent postural-perceptual dizziness. Front Neurol2022; 13: 872892.
30.
NguyenTTKangJ-JNguyenTT, et al.Clinical characteristics and otolith dysfunction in presbyvestibulopathy: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Heliyon2024; 10(12): e32536.
31.
DorbeauCBourgetKRenardL, et al.Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis2021; 138(6): 483–488.
32.
Otero-MillanJTreviñoCWinnickA, et al.The video ocular counter-roll (vOCR): a clinical test to detect loss of otolith-ocular function. Acta Otolaryngol2017; 137(6): 593–597.
33.
WagnerARAkinsolaOChaudhariAMW, et al.Measuring vestibular contributions to age-related balance impairment: a review. Front Neurol2021; 12: 635305.
