Eye gaze communicates a person’s attentional state and intentions toward objects. Here we demonstrate that this important social signal has the potential to distort time perception of gazed-at objects (N = 70 adults). By using a novel gaze-associated learning paradigm combined with the time-discrimination task, we showed that objects previously associated with others’ eye gaze were perceived as significantly shorter in duration than the nonassociated counterparts. The time-compression effect cannot be attributed to general attention allocation because it disappeared when objects were associated with nonsocial attention cues (i.e., arrows). Critically, this effect correlated with observers’ autistic traits and vanished when the gazing agent’s line of sight was blocked by barriers, reflecting the key role of intention processing triggered by gaze in modulating time perception. Our findings support the existence of a special mechanism tuned to social cues, which can shape our perception of the outer world in time domains.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.HillJ.RasteY.PlumbI. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715
2.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.SkinnerR.MartinJ.ClubleyE. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471
3.
BaylissA. P.PaulM. A.CannonP. R.TipperS. P. (2006). Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1061–1066. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618606
CapozziF.RisticJ. (2020). Attention AND mentalizing? Reframing a debate on social orienting of attention. Visual Cognition, 28(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1725206
8.
Chacón-CandiaJ. A.Román-CaballeroR.Aranda-MartínB.CasagrandeM.LupiáñezJ.MarottaA. (2023). Are there quantitative differences between eye-gaze and arrow cues? A meta-analytic answer to the debate and a call for qualitative differences. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 144, Article 104993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104993
9.
ColeG. G.SmithD. T.AtkinsonM. A. (2015). Mental state attribution and the gaze cueing effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(4), 1105–1115. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0780-6
10.
DawsonG.BernierR.RingR. H. (2012). Social attention: A possible early indicator of efficacy in autism clinical trials. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-4-11
EaglemanD. M.PariyadathV. (2009). Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 364(1525), 1841–1851. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0026
14.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
15.
FriesenC. K.KingstoneA. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(3), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208827
16.
FrischenA.BaylissA. P.TipperS. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
17.
GregoryS. E.JacksonM. C. (2017). Joint attention enhances visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000294
18.
GregoryS. E.JacksonM. C. (2019). Barriers block the effect of joint attention on working memory: Perspective taking matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(5), 795–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000622
19.
JarickM.LaidlawK. E. W.NasiopoulosE.KingstoneA. (2016). Eye contact affects attention more than arousal as revealed by prospective time estimation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(5), 1302–1307. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1085-8
20.
JiH.WangL.JiangY. (2020). Cross-category adaptation of reflexive social attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000766
21.
JiH.YuanT.YuY.WangL.JiangY. (2022). Internal social attention: Gaze cues stored in working memory trigger involuntary attentional orienting. Psychological Science, 33(9), 1532–1540. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221094628
22.
KlieglK. M.WatrinL.HuckaufA. (2015). Duration perception of emotional stimuli: Using evaluative conditioning to avoid sensory confounds. Cognition and Emotion, 29(8), 1350–1367. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.978841
23.
KokP.JeheeJ. F. M.de LangeF. P. (2012). Less is more: Expectation sharpens representations in the primary visual cortex. Neuron, 75(2), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.034
LiuR.YuanX.ChenK.JiangY.ZhouW. (2018). Perception of social interaction compresses subjective duration in an oxytocin-dependent manner. eLife, 7, Article e32100. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32100
26.
LiuW.YuanX.LiuD.WangL.JiangY. (2021). Social attention triggered by eye gaze and walking direction is resistant to temporal decay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(9), 1237–1246. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000939
27.
MadipakkamA. R.BellucciG.RothkirchM.ParkS. Q. (2019). The influence of gaze direction on food preferences. Scientific Reports, 9(1), Article 5604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41815-9
28.
ManeraV.ElenaM. R.BaylissA. P.BecchioC. (2014). When seeing is more than looking: Intentional gaze modulates object desirability. Emotion, 14(4), 824–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036258
29.
McKayK. T.GraingerS. A.CoundourisS. P.SkorichD. P.PhillipsL. H.HenryJ. D. (2021). Visual attentional orienting by eye gaze: A meta-analytic review of the gaze-cueing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 147, 1269–1289. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000353
MundyP. (2018). A review of joint attention and social-cognitive brain systems in typical development and autism spectrum disorder. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 47(6), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13720
32.
NoguchiY.KakigiR. (2006). Time representations can be made from nontemporal information in the brain: An MEG study. Cerebral Cortex, 16(12), 1797–1808. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhj117
NummenmaaL.EngellA. D.von dem HagenE.HensonR. N. A.CalderA. J. (2012). Autism spectrum traits predict the neural response to eye gaze in typical individuals. NeuroImage, 59(4), 3356–3363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.075
35.
OttenM.SethA. K.PintoY. (2017). A social Bayesian brain: How social knowledge can shape visual perception. Brain and Cognition, 112, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.05.002
36.
PelliD. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897x00366
37.
ReidV. M.StrianoT. (2005). Adult gaze influences infant attention and object processing: Implications for cognitive neuroscience. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21(6), 1763–1766. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03986.x
38.
RisticJ.FriesenC. K.KingstoneA. (2002). Are eyes special? It depends on how you look at it. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196306
39.
SaleraC.BocciaM.PecchinendaA. (2023). Segregation of neural circuits involved in social gaze and non-social arrow cues: Evidence from an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09593-4
40.
SenjuA.SouthgateV.WhiteS.FrithU. (2009). Mindblind eyes: An absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Science, 325(5942), 883–885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176170
41.
SenjuA.TojoY.DairokuH.HasegawaT. (2004). Reflexive orienting in response to eye gaze and an arrow in children with and without autism. Journal of Child Psychology, 45(3), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00236.x
42.
SevgiM.DiaconescuA. O.HencoL.TittgemeyerM.SchilbachL. (2020). Social Bayes: Using Bayesian modeling to study autistic trait–related differences in social cognition. Biological Psychiatry, 87(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.09.032
43.
ShepherdS. V. (2010). Following gaze: Gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 4, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2010.00005
44.
StephensonL. J.EdwardsS. G.HowardE. E.BaylissA. P. (2018). Eyes that bind us: Gaze leading induces an implicit sense of agency. Cognition, 172, 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.011
45.
ThönesS.HechtH. (2016). How long did you look at me? The influence of gaze direction on perceived duration and temporal sensitivity. Perception, 45(6), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616633367
46.
UlloaJ. L.MarchettiC.TaffouM.GeorgeN. (2015). Only your eyes tell me what you like: Exploring the liking effect induced by other’s gaze. Cognition and Emotion, 29(3), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.919899
47.
van der WeidenA.VelingH.AartsH. (2010). When observing gaze shifts of others enhances object desirability. Emotion, 10(6), 939–943. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020501
48.
WahlS.MichelC.PauenS.HoehlS. (2013). Head and eye movements affect object processing in 4-month-old infants more than an artificial orientation cue. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(Pt. 2), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12001
49.
WangL.JiangY. (2012). Life motion signals lengthen perceived temporal duration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109(11), E673–E677. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115515109
50.
WangL.WangY.XuQ.LiuD.JiH.YuY.HuZ.YuanP.JiangY. (2020). Heritability of reflexive social attention triggered by eye gaze and walking direction: Common and unique genetic underpinnings. Psychological Medicine, 50(3), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171900031X
51.
YuanT.JiH.WangL.JiangY. (2023). Happy is stronger than sad: Emotional information modulates social attention. Emotion, 23(4), 1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001145
52.
ZhangL.SunY.ChenF.WuD.TangJ.HanX.YeJ.WangK. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient in both clinical and non-clinical samples: Chinese version for mainland China. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), Article 213. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0915-5
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
