We examined whether there is evidence for racial and gender bias in the voting patterns of contestants on Survivor, a reality-television zero-sum game in which contestants compete for up to 39 days to win $1 million. Among 731 contestants across 40 seasons, we found evidence of racial and gender bias at multiple stages of Survivor. Compared with men, women were more likely to be voted out of their tribe first and were less likely to make it to the individual-competition stage of the game (i.e., the “merge”). They were also less likely to win Survivor. Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) contestants, compared with White contestants, were more likely to be voted out of their tribe first and were less likely to make it to the individual-competition stage of the game. These findings suggest a systemic bias in favor of White men and against women of color.
BadgettM. V. L.CarpenterC. S.SansoneD. (2021). LGBTQ economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(2), 141–170. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.2.141
2.
BallietD.WuJ.De DreuC. K. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1556–1581.
3.
BealeF. (1970). Double jeopardy: To be Black and female. In CadeT. (Ed.), The Black woman: An anthology (pp. 90–100). New American Library.
4.
BearmanS.KorobovN.ThorneA. (2009). The fabric of internalized sexism. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 1(1), 10–47.
5.
BöhmR.RuschH.BaronJ. (2020). The psychology of intergroup conflict: A review of theories and measures. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 178, 947–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.01.020
CharlesworthT. E. S.BanajiM. R. (2019). Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes: I. Long-term change and stability from 2007 to 2016. Psychological Science, 30(2), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618813087
9.
DilksL. M.ThyeS. R.TaylorP. A. (2010). Socializing economic theories of discrimination: Lessons from Survivor. Social Science Research, 39(6), 1164–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.06.006
10.
EverettJ. A.FaberN. S.CrockettM. (2015). Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015
GaertnerS. L. (1973). Helping behavior and racial discrimination among liberals and conservatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(3), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034221
13.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (1977). The subtlety of White racism, arousal, and helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(10), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.10.691
14.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2000). The aversive form of racism. In StangorC. (Ed.), Stereotypes and prejudice: Essential readings (pp. 289–304). Psychology Press.
15.
GreenwaldA. G.BrendlM.CaiH.CharlesworthT.CvencekD.DovidioJ. F.FrieseM.HahnA.HehmanE.HofmannW.HughesS.HusseyI.JordanC.JostJ.KirbyT.LaiC. K.LangJ.LindgrenK. P.MaisonD.. . . WiersR. W. (2022). The Implicit Association Test at age 20: What is known and what is not known about implicit bias. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bf97c
16.
GreenwaldA. G.PettigrewT. F. (2014). With malice toward none and charity for some: Ingroup favoritism enables discrimination. American Psychologist, 69(7), 669–684.
KunzeA. (2017). The gender wage gap in developed countries. In AverettS. L.ArgysL. M.HoffmanS. D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of women and the economy (p. 369–394). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628963.013.11
McDonaldM. M.NavarreteC. D.SidaniusJ. (2011). Developing a theory of gendered prejudice: An evolutionary and social dominance perspective. In KramerR. M.LeonardelliG. J.Livingston (Eds.), Social cognition, social identity, and intergroup relations: A Festschrift in honor of Marilynn B. Brewer (pp. 189–220). Psychology Press.
22.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. https://www.R-project.org/
23.
SherifM. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 349–356.
24.
SherifM.SherifC. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension: An integration of studies of intergroup relations. Harper & Brothers.
25.
SidaniusJ.HudsonS. T. J.DavisG.BerghR. (2018). The theory of gendered prejudice: A social dominance and intersectionalist perspective. In MintzA.TerrisL. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of behavioral political science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190634131.013.11
26.
SingmannH.BolkerB.WestfallJ.AustF.Ben-ShacharM. (2022). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments (R Package Version 1.1-1) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex
27.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Brooks/Cole.
28.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations: Key readings in social psychology (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
29.
TracyS. J.RiveraK. D. (2010). Endorsing equity and applauding stay-at-home moms: How male voices on work-life reveal aversive sexism and flickers of transformation. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909352248
30.
WallG. (2011). Outwit, outplay, outcast? Sex discrimination in voting behaviour in the reality television show Survivor. New Zealand Economic Papers, 45(1–2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2011.556078
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
