Although researchers have debated whether a core deficit of nonsymbolic representation of magnitude underlies developmental dyscalculia (DD), research has mostly focused on numerosity processing. We probed the possibility of a general magnitude deficit in individuals with DD and asked whether sensitivity to size varied in contexts of depth ordering and size constancy. We measured full psychometric functions in size-discrimination tasks in 12 participants with DD and 13 control participants. Results showed that although people with DD exhibited veridical perceived magnitude, their sensitivity to size was clearly impaired. In contrast, when objects were embedded in depth cues allowing size-constancy computations, participants with DD demonstrated typical sensitivity to size. These results demonstrate a deficit in the perceptual resolutions of magnitude in DD. At the same time, the finding of an intact size constancy suggests that when magnitude perception is facilitated by implicit mandatory computations of size constancy, this deficit is no longer evident.
AmalricM.DehaeneS. (2016). Origins of the brain networks for advanced mathematics in expert mathematicians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113(18), 4909–4917.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.
3.
AnobileG.BurrD. C.GasperiniF.CicchiniG. M. (2019). Near optimal encoding of numerosity in typical and dyscalculic development. Cortex, 120, 498–508.
4.
AnobileG.CicchiniG. M.BurrD. C. (2016). Number as a primary perceptual attribute: A review. Perception, 45(1–2), 5–31.
5.
AnobileG.CicchiniG. M.GasperiniF.BurrD. C. (2018). Typical numerosity adaptation despite selectively impaired number acuity in dyscalculia. Neuropsychologia, 120, 43–49.
6.
BugdenS.AnsariD. (2016). Probing the nature of deficits in the ‘approximate number system’ in children with persistent developmental dyscalculia. Developmental Science, 19(5), 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12324
7.
BulthéJ.PrinsenJ.VanderauweraJ.DuyckS.DanielsN.GillebertC. R.MantiniD.OpdeBeeckH. P.De SmedtB. (2019). Multi-method brain imaging reveals impaired representations of number as well as altered connectivity in adults with dyscalculia. NeuroImage, 190, 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.012
8.
BurrD. C.AnobileG.ArrighiR. (2018). Psychophysical evidence for the number sense. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1740), Article 20170045. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0045
9.
ButterworthB. (2011). Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia. In DehaeneS.BrannonE. (Eds.), Space, time and number in the brain (pp. 249–265). Academic Press.
10.
CantlonJ. F.PlattM. L.BrannonE. M. (2009). Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 83–91.
11.
CastaldiE.MirassouA.DehaeneS.PiazzaM.EgerE. (2018). Asymmetrical interference between number and item size perception provides evidence for a domain specific impairment in dyscalculia. PLOS ONE, 13(12), Article e0209256. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209256
12.
DehaeneS. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press.
13.
de HeviaM. D.IzardV.CoubartA.SpelkeE. S.StreriA. (2014). Representations of space, time, and number in neonates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111(13), 4809–4813.
14.
De SmedtB.GilmoreC. K. (2011). Defective number module or impaired access? Numerical magnitude processing in first graders with mathematical difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(2), 278–292.
15.
DevineA.SoltészF.NobesA.GoswamiU.SzűcsD. (2013). Gender differences in developmental dyscalculia depend on diagnostic criteria. Learning and Instruction, 27, 31–39.
16.
De VisscherA.NoëlM. P.PesentiM.DormalV. (2018). Developmental dyscalculia in adults: Beyond numerical magnitude impairment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 600–611.
17.
GebuisT.ReynvoetB. (2012). The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 642–648.
18.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
19.
GliksmanY.HenikA. (2018). Conceptual size in developmental dyscalculia and dyslexia. Neuropsychology, 32(2), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000432
20.
GoldfarbL.TzelgovJ. (2005). Is size perception based on monocular distance cues computed automatically?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(4), 751–754.
21.
HadadB.-S.SchwartzS. (2019). Perception in autism does not adhere to Weber’s law. eLife, 8, Article e42223. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42223
22.
HalberdaJ.LyR.WilmerJ. B.NaimanD. Q.GermineL. (2012). Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109(28), 11116–11120.
23.
HenikA.GliksmanY.KallaiA.LeibovichT. (2017). Size perception and the foundation of numerical processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 45–51.
24.
HenikA.LeibovichT.NaparstekS.DiesendruckL.RubinstenO. (2012). Quantities, amounts, and the numerical core system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00186
25.
IzardV.SannC.SpelkeE. S.StreriA. (2009). Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(25), 10382–10385.
26.
LeibovichT.KatzinN.HarelM.HenikA. (2017). From “sense of number” to “sense of magnitude”: The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, Article e164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000960
27.
LibertusM. E.FeigensonL.HalberdaJ. (2018). Infants extract frequency distributions from variable approximate numerical information. Infancy, 23(1), 29–44.
28.
LourencoS. F.LongoM. R. (2010). General magnitude representation in human infants. Psychological Science, 21(6), 873–881.
29.
LuP.LiuJ.KoestlerD. (2017). pwr2: Power and sample size analysis for one-way and two-way ANOVA models (Version 1.0) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=pwr2
30.
MaloneS. A.PritchardV. E.Heron-DelaneyM.BurgoyneK.LervågA.HulmeC. (2019). The relationship between numerosity discrimination and arithmetic skill reflects the approximate number system and cannot be explained by inhibitory control. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 184, 220–231.
31.
McCaskeyU.von AsterM.TuuraR. O.KucianK. (2017). Adolescents with developmental dyscalculia do not have a generalized magnitude deficit – processing of discrete and continuous magnitudes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article 102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00102
32.
NewcombeN. S. (2014). The origins and development of magnitude estimation. Ecological Psychology, 26(1–2), 147–157.
33.
NiederA. (2017). Number faculty is rooted in our biological heritage. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(6), 403–404.
34.
RubinstenO.HenikA. (2009). Developmental dyscalculia: Heterogeneity might not mean different mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 92–99.
35.
SchneiderM.BeeresK.CobanL.MerzS.SchmidtS. S.StrickerJ.De SmedtB. (2017). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 20(3), Article e12372.
36.
SkagerlundK.TräffU. (2014). Development of magnitude processing in children with developmental dyscalculia: Space, time, and number. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 675. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00675
37.
SokolowskiH. M.AnsariD. (2016). Symbolic and nonsymbolic representation of number in the human parietal cortex: A review of the state-of-the-art, outstanding questions and future directions. In HenikA. (Ed.), Continuous issues in numerical cognition: How many or how much (pp. 326–353). Academic Press.
38.
von AsterM. G.ShalevR. S. (2007). Number development and developmental dyscalculia. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49, 868–873.
39.
WalshV. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 483–488.
40.
WangJ. J.HalberdaJ.FeigensonL. (2017). Approximate number sense correlates with math performance in gifted adolescents. Acta Psychologica, 176, 78–84.
YonasA.PettersenL.GranrudC. E. (1982). Infants’ sensitivity to familiar size as information for distance. Child Development, 53(5), 1285–1290.
43.
Zikmund-FisherB. J.ExeN. L.WittemanH. O. (2014). Numeracy and literacy independently predict patients’ ability to identify out-of-range test results. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(8), Article e18. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3241
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
