Little is known about the role of declarative memory in the ongoing perception of one’s personality. Seven individuals who developed a rare and severe type of anterograde amnesia following damage to their medial temporal lobes were identified from our neurological patient registry. We examined the stability of their personality ratings on the Big Five Inventory over five retest periods and assessed the accuracy of their ratings via analyses of self–caregiver agreement. The patients portrayed a stable sense of self over the course of 1 year. However, their self-ratings differed from those provided by the caregivers. Intriguingly, these discrepancies diminished when caregivers retrospectively rated the patients’ personalities prior to their brain injury, suggesting that patients’ perceptions of themselves were stuck in the past. We interpret our findings to indicate that the ability to form new declarative memories is not required for maintaining a stable sense of self but may be important for updating one’s sense of self over time.
AllenJ. S.TranelD.BrussJ.DamasioH. (2006). Correlations between regional brain volumes and memory performance in anoxia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390590949287
2.
BarrashJ.StussD. T.AksanN.AndersonS. W.JonesR. D.ManzelK.TranelD. (2018). “Frontal lobe syndrome”? Subtypes of acquired personality disturbances in patients with focal brain damage. Cortex, 106, 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.007
3.
BarrashJ.TranelD.AndersonS. W. (2000). Acquired personality disturbances associated with bilateral damage to the ventromedial prefrontal region. Developmental Neuropsychology, 18(3), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532694205Barrash
4.
CavacoS.FeinsteinJ. S.van TwillertH.TranelD. (2012). Musical memory in a patient with severe anterograde amnesia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34(10), 1089–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F13803395.2012.728568
CostelloC. K.SrivastavaS.SaucierG. (2018). Stability and change in the Big Five and Big Six: New tests of the maturity and cumulative continuity principles. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b36tv
7.
DuffM. C.WszalekT.TranelD.CohenN. J. (2008). Successful life outcome and management of real-world memory demands despite profound anterograde amnesia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30(8), 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390801894681
8.
FeinsteinJ. S.RudraufD.KhalsaS. S.CassellM. D.BrussJ.GrabowskiT. J.TranelD. (2010). Bilateral limbic system destruction in man. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390903066873
9.
GnambsT. (2014). A meta-analysis of dependability coefficients (test–retest reliabilities) for measures of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.06.003
10.
GrilliM. D.BercelJ. J.WankA. A.RapcsakS. Z. (2018). The contribution of the left anterior ventrolateral temporal lobe to the retrieval of personal semantics. Neuropsychologia, 117, 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.06.002
11.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). Guilford Press.
12.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
13.
JonesR. D.GrabowskiT. J.TranelD. (1998). The neural basis of retrograde memory: Evidence from positron emission tomography for the role of non-mesial temporal lobe structures. Neurocase, 4(6), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554799808410640
14.
KleinS. B.CosmidesL.CostabileK. A. (2003). Preserved knowledge of self in a case of Alzheimer’s dementia. Social Cognition, 21(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.21.2.157.21317
15.
KleinS. B.GangiC. E. (2010). The multiplicity of self: Neuropsychological evidence and its implications for the self as a construct in psychological research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05441.x
16.
KleinS. B.LaxM. L. (2010). The unanticipated resilience of trait self-knowledge in the face of neural damage. Memory, 18(8), 918–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2010.524651
KurtzJ. E.PutnamS. H. (2006). Patient-informant agreement on personality ratings and self-awareness after head injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20(3), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040590967090
19.
KurtzJ. E.PutnamS. H.StoneC. (1998). Stability of normal personality traits after traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-199806000-00002
20.
LongleyS. L.WatsonD.NoyesR.Jr. (2005). Assessment of the hypochondriasis domain: The Multidimensional Inventory of Hypochondriacal Traits (MIHT). Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.3
21.
MahoneyC. J.RohrerJ. D.OmarR.RossorM. N.WarrenJ. D. (2011). Neuroanatomical profiles of personality change in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 198(5), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.082677
22.
MarquineM. J. (2008). Self-knowledge and self-referential processing in memory disorders: Implications for neuropsychological rehabilitation (Publication No. 3315558) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
23.
PhilippiC. L.FeinsteinJ. S.KhalsaS. S.DamasioA.TranelD.LandiniG.WillifordK.RudraufD. (2012). Preserved self-awareness following extensive bilateral brain damage to the insula, anterior cingulate, and medial prefrontal cortices. PLOS ONE, 7(8), Article e38413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038413
24.
RathboneC. J.MoulinC. J. A.ConwayM. A. (2009). Autobiographical memory and amnesia: Using conceptual knowledge to ground the self. Neurocase: The Neural Basis of Cognition, 15(5), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790902849164
25.
RobertsB. W.DelVecchioW. F. (2000). The rank order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.3
26.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi/org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
27.
ScovilleW. B.MilnerB. (1957). Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 20(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11
28.
SoldzS.VaillantG. E. (1999). The Big Five personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(2), 208–232. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2243
29.
SotoC. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619831612
30.
SotoC. J. [@cjsotomatic]. (2020, November10). Haven’t published these stats, but in the LOOPR Project (Soto, 2019) four-week retest correlations are .86/80/84/86/83 [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/cjsotomatic/status/1326277246395572231
31.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.002
32.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143.
33.
TateR. L. (2003). Impact of pre-injury factors on outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: Does post-traumatic personality change represent an exacerbation of premorbid traits?Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010244000372
34.
TellegenA. (1988). The analysis of consistency in personality assessment. Journal of Personality, 56(3), 621–663.
35.
TulvingE. (1993). Self-knowledge of an amnesic individual is represented abstractly. In SrullT. K.WyerR. S., Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition: Vol. 5. The mental representation of trait and autobiographical knowledge about the self (pp. 147–156). Erlbaum.
36.
TurnerJ. C.OnoratoR. S. (1999). Social identity, personality, and the self-concept: A self-categorization perspective. In TylerT. R.KramerR. M.JohnO. P. (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 11–46). Erlbaum.
37.
VaidyaJ. G.GrayE. K.HaigJ.WatsonD. (2002). On the temporal stability of personality: Evidence for differential stability and the role of life experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1469–1484. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1469
38.
WatsonD. (2004). Stability versus change, dependability versus error: Issues in the assessment of personality over time. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(4), 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.03.001
39.
WatsonD.HubbardB.WieseD. (2000). Self–other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.546
Zola-MorganS. M.SquireL. R.AmaralD. G. (1986). Human amnesia and the medial temporal region: Enduring memory impairment following a bilateral lesion limited to field CA1 of the hippocampus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 6(10), 2950–2967. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-10-02950.1986
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
