Neural activation in a 12-item probe-recognition task was examined to investigate the contribution of the hippocampus to long-term memory (LTM) retrieval and working memory (WM) retrieval. Results indicated a dissociation between the last item that participants studied and other items of the study list: Compared with all other serial positions, activation was reduced for the item in the most recent position (for which no items intervened between study and test). This finding suggests that this last item was in focal attention at test time, and, therefore, no retrieval operation was required to access it. However, contra the assertion that the hippocampus should selectively support LTM, activation of the medial temporal lobe was observed for all serial positions other than the last position, and activation level could be predicted from the underlying memory strength. Collectively, these findings support single-store accounts that assume there are similar operating principles across WM and LTM representations, and the focus of attention is limited.
BaddeleyA.D.HitchG. (1974). Working memory. In BowerG.H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
2.
BrettM.AntonJ.-L.ValabregueR.PolineJ.-B. (2002). Marseille boîte à région d’intérêt (MarsBaR; Version 0.41) [Computer software]. Retrieved May 21, 2010, from http://marsbar.sourceforge.net/
3.
CowanN. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In MiyakeA.ShahP. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4.
CowanN. (2005). Working memory capacity: Essays in cognitive psychology. New York: Psychology Press.
5.
CrowderR.G. (1993). Short-term memory: Where do we stand?Memory & Cognition, 21, 142–145.
6.
DavachiL. (2006). Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 693–700.
7.
DavachiL.MitchellJ.P.WagnerA.D. (2003). Multiple routes to memory: Distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 2157–2162.
EldridgeL.L.KnowltonB.J.FurmanskiC.S.BookheimerS.Y.EngelS.A. (2000). Remembering episodes: A selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1149–1152.
JonidesJ.LewisR.L.NeeD.E.LustigC.A.BermanM.G.MooreK.S. (2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 193–224.
12.
LuckS.J.VogelE.K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.
13.
MayesA.R.MontaldiD.MigoE. (2007). Associative memory and the medial temporal lobes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 126–135.
14.
McElreeB. (1998). Attended and non-attended states in working memory: Accessing categorized structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 225–252.
15.
McElreeB. (2006). Accessing recent events. In RossB.H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 46, pp. 155–200). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16.
McElreeB.DosherB.A. (1989). Serial position and set size in short-term memory: Time course of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 18, 346–373.
17.
McElreeB.DosherB.A. (2001). The focus of attention across space and time. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 129–130.
18.
NairneJ.S. (2002). Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 53–81.
19.
NeeD.E.JonidesJ. (2008). Neural correlates of access to short-term memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 14228–14233.
20.
OberauerK. (2001). Removing irrelevant information from working memory: An age-comparative study with the modified Sternberg task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 948–957.
21.
OberauerK. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411–421.
22.
ÖztekinI.CurtisC.McElreeB. (2008). The medial temporal lobe and the left inferior prefrontal cortex jointly support interference resolution in verbal working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1967–1979.
23.
ÖztekinI.McElreeB. (2007). Proactive interference slows recognition by eliminating fast assessments of familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 126–149.
24.
ÖztekinI.McElreeB.StaresinaB.DavachiL. (2008). Working memory retrieval: Contributions of left prefrontal cortex, left posterior parietal cortex and hippocampus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 581–593.
25.
SquireL.R.WixtedJ.T.ClarkR.E. (2007). Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: A new perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 872–883.
26.
SurprenantA.M.NeathI. (2009). The 9 lives of short-term memory. In ThornA.PageM. (Eds.), Interactions between short-term and long-term memory in the verbal domain (pp. 16–43). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
27.
TalmiD.GradyC.L.Goshen-GottsteinY.MoscovitchM. (2005). Neuroimaging the serial position curve: A test of single-store versus dual-store models. Psychological Science, 16, 716–723.
28.
VogelE.K.MachizawaM.G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748–751.
29.
VogelE.K.WoodmanG.F.LuckS.J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 92–114.
WickelgrenW.A. (1973). The long and the short of memory. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 425–438.
32.
WickelgrenW.A.CorbettA.T.DosherB.A. (1980). Priming and retrieval from short-term memory: A speed accuracy trade-off analysis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 387–404.
