We used a new theory of the biological basis of the Big Five personality traits to generate hypotheses about the association of each trait with the volume of different brain regions. Controlling for age, sex, and whole-brain volume, results from structural magnetic resonance imaging of 116 healthy adults supported our hypotheses for four of the five traits: Extraversion, Neuroticism, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. Extraversion covaried with volume of medial orbitofrontal cortex, a brain region involved in processing reward information. Neuroticism covaried with volume of brain regions associated with threat, punishment, and negative affect. Agreeableness covaried with volume in regions that process information about the intentions and mental states of other individuals. Conscientiousness covaried with volume in lateral prefrontal cortex, a region involved in planning and the voluntary control of behavior. These findings support our biologically based, explanatory model of the Big Five and demonstrate the potential of personality neuroscience (i.e., the systematic study of individual differences in personality using neuroscience methods) as a discipline.
AsahiS.OkamatoY.AkadoG.YamawakiS.YokotaN. (2004). Negative correlation between right prefrontal activity during response inhibition and impulsiveness: A fMRI study. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 254, 245–251.
2.
BoykeJ.DriemeyerJ.GaserC.BuchelC.MayA. (2008). Training-induced brain structure changes in the elderly. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 7031–7035.
3.
BremnerJ.D.NarayanM.AndersonE.R.StaibL.H.MillerH.L.CharneyD.S. (2000). Hippocampal volume reduction in major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 115–118.
4.
BrownS.M.ManuckS.B.FloryJ.D.HaririA.R. (2006). Neural basis of individual differences in impulsivity: Contributions of corticolimbic circuits for behavioral arousal and control. Emotion, 6, 239–245.
5.
BungeS.A.ZelazoP.D. (2006). A brain-based account of the development of rule use in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 118–121.
6.
CanliT. (2008). Toward a “molecular psychology” of personality. In JohnO.P.RobinsR.W.PervinL.A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 311–327). New York: Guilford Press.
7.
CarterC.S.BraverT.S.BarchD.M.BotvinickM.M.NollD.CohenJ.D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747–749.
8.
ClarkL.A.WatsonD. (2008). Temperament: An organizing paradigm for trait psychology. In JohnO.P.RobinsR.W.PervinL.A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 265–286). New York: Guilford Press.
DepueR.A.CollinsP.F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569.
11.
DeYoungC.G.GrayJ.R. (2009). Personality neuroscience: Explaining individual differences in affect, behavior, and cognition. In CorrP.J.MatthewsG. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 323–346). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DeYoungC.G.PetersonJ.B.HigginsD.M. (2005). Sources of Openness/Intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73, 825–858.
13.
DeYoungC.G.ShamoshN.A.GreenE.A.BraverT.S.GrayJ.R. (2009). Intellect as distinct from openness: Differences revealed through fMRI of working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 883–892.
14.
EisenbergerN.I.LiebermanM.D. (2004). Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 294–300.
15.
FleesonW. (2001). Towards a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.
16.
GrayJ.A.McNaughtonN. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
GrayJ.R.ChabrisC.F.BraverT.S. (2003). Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 316–322.
18.
GrazianoW.G.HabashiM.M.SheeseB.E.TobinR.M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person × situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 583–599.
19.
HaasB.W.ConstableR.T.CanliT. (2008). Stop the sadness: Neuroticism is associated with sustained medial prefrontal cortex response to emotional facial expressions. NeuroImage, 42, 385–392.
20.
HeathertonT.F.MacraeC.N.KelleyW.M. (2004). What the social brain sciences can tell us about the self. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 190–193.
21.
HemphillJ.F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78–80.
22.
HolmesC.J.HogeR.CollinsD.L.WoodsR.TogaA.EvansA.C. (1998). Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 22, 324–333.
23.
JohnO.P.NaumannL.P.SotoC.J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO.P.RobinsR.W.PervinL.A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford Press.
24.
KanwisherN.McDermottJ.ChunM.M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.
25.
KosslynS.M.CacioppoJ.T.DavidsonR.J.HugdahlK.LovalloW.R.SpiegelD.RoseR. (2002). Bridging psychology and biology: The analysis of individuals in groups. American Psychologist, 57, 341–351.
26.
McCraeR.R.CostaP.T.Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In HoganR.JohnsonJ.BriggsS. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). Boston: Academic Press.
27.
McCraeR.R.CostaP.T.Jr. (2008). The five factor theory of personality. In JohnO.P.RobinsR.W.PervinL.A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159–181). New York: Guilford Press.
28.
McDanielM.A. (2005). Big-brained people are smarter: A meta-analysis of the relationship between in vivo brain volume and intelligence. Intelligence, 33, 337–346.
29.
MillerE.K.CohenJ.D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.
30.
NettleD.LiddleB. (2008). Agreeableness is related to social-cognitive, but not social-perceptual, theory of mind. European Journal of Personality, 22, 323–335.
31.
OchsnerK.N.GrossJ.J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 242–249.
32.
OmuraK.ConstableR.T.CanliT. (2005). Amygdala gray matter concentration is associated with extraversion and neuroticism. NeuroReport, 16, 1905–1908.
33.
OzerD.J.Benet-MartinezV. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 201–221.
34.
PapademetrisX.JackowskiM.RajeevanN.OkudaH.ConstableR.T.StaibL.H. (2006). BioImage Suite: An integrated medical image analysis suite: An update. [Computer software]. Available from http://www.bioimagesuite.org
35.
PelphreyK.A.MorrisJ.P. (2006). Brain mechanisms for interpreting the actions of others from biological-motion cues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 136–140.
36.
RauchS.L.MiladM.R.OrrS.P.QuinnB.T.FischlB.PitmanR.K. (2005). Orbitofrontal thickness, retention of fear extinction, and extraversion. NeuroReport, 16, 1909−1912.
37.
SaxeR.PowellL.J. (2006). It’s the thought that counts: Specific brain regions for one component of theory of mind. Psychological Science, 17, 692–699.
38.
ShawP.GreensteinD.LerchJ.ClasenL.LenrootR.GogtayN.. (2006). Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature, 440, 676–679.
WilliamsL.M.BrownK.J.PalmerD.LiddellB.J.KempA.H.OlivieriG.. (2006). The mellow years?: Neural basis of improving emotional stability over age. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6422–6430.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
