Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

People preferentially attend to external stimuli that are related to themselves compared with others. Whether a similar self-reference bias applies to internal representations, such as those maintained in working memory (WM), is presently unknown. We tested this possibility in four experiments, in which participants were first trained to associate social labels (self, friend, stranger) with arbitrary colors and then performed a delayed match-to-sample spatial WM task on color locations. Participants consistently responded fastest to WM probes at locations of self-associated colors (Experiments 1–4). This self-bias was driven not by differential exogenous attention during encoding or retrieval (Experiments 1 and 2) but by internal attentional prioritization of self-related representations during WM maintenance (Experiment 3). Moreover, self-prioritization in WM was nonstrategic, as this bias persisted even under conditions in which it hurt WM performance. These findings document an automatic prioritization of self-referential items in WM, which may form the basis of some egocentric biases in decision making.

Keywords

self-reference self-prioritization effect self-bias working memory internal attention open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexopoulos

Muller

Ric

Marendaz

(2012). I, me, mine: Automatic attentional capture by self-related stimuli. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 770–779. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1882

Awh

Jonides

(2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 119–126. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01593-X

Awh

Jonides

Reuter-Lorenz

P. A.

(1998). Rehearsal in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 780–790. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.780

Baddeley

(2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839. doi:10.1038/nrn1201

Banaji

M. R.

Prentice

D. A.

(1994). The self in social contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 297–332. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.001501

Barrouillet

Bernardin

Camos

(2004). Time constraints and resource sharing in adults’ working memory spans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 83–100.

Berryhill

M. E.

Richmond

L. L.

Shay

C. S.

Olson

I. R.

(2012). Shifting attention among working memory representations: Testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 426–438.

Blalock

L. D.

Clegg

B. A.

(2010). Encoding and representation of simultaneous and sequential arrays in visuospatial working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 856–862. doi:10.1080/17470211003690680

Brédart

Delchambre

Laureys

(2006). One’s own face is hard to ignore. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 46–52. doi:10.1080/17470210500343678

10.

Davelaar

E. J.

Goshen-Gottstein

Ashkenazi

Haarmann

H. J.

Usher

(2005). The demise of short-term memory revisited: Empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. Psychological Review, 112, 3–42.

11.

D’Esposito

Postle

B. R.

(2015). The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 115–142. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031

12.

Devue

Brédart

(2008). Attention to self-referential stimuli: Can I ignore my own face? Acta Psychologica, 128, 290–297. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.004

13.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/bf03193146

14.

Griffin

I. C.

Nobre

A. C.

(2003). Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1176–1194.

15.

Gunseli

van Moorselaar

Meeter

Olivers

C. N. L.

(2015). The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1334–1341. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0796-x

16.

Harris

C. R.

Pashler

(2004). Attention and the processing of emotional words and names: Not so special after all. Psychological Science, 15, 171–178. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503005.x

17.

Hay

D. C.

Smyth

M. M.

Hitch

G. J.

Horton

N. J.

(2007). Serial position effects in short-term visual memory: A SIMPLE explanation? Memory & Cognition, 35, 176–190. doi:10.3758/bf03195953

18.

Humphreys

G. W.

Sui

(2015). The salient self: Social saliency effects based on self-bias. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 129–140. doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.996156

19.

Kesebir

Oishi

(2010). A spontaneous self-reference effect in memory: Why some birthdays are harder to remember than others. Psychological Science, 21, 1525–1531. doi:10.1177/0956797610383436

20.

Keyes

Brady

(2010). Self-face recognition is characterized by “bilateral gain” and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 840–847. doi:10.1080/17470211003611264

21.

Kiyonaga

Egner

(2013). Working memory as internal attention: Toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 228–242. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0359-y

22.

Liu

Rotsthein

Sui

(2016). Dynamically orienting your own face facilitates the automatic attraction of attention. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 37–44. doi:10.1080/17588928.2015.1044428

23.

Oberauer

(2009). Design for a working memory. In Ross

B. H.

(Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 45–100). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

24.

Schneider

Eschman

Zuccolotto

(2012). E-Prime 2.0 reference guide manual. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools .

25.

Shimi

Nobre

A. C.

Astle

D. E.

Scerif

(2014). Orienting attention within visual short-term memory: Development and mechanisms. Child Development, 85, 578–592.

26.

Souza

A. S.

Oberauer

(2016). In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 1839–1860.

27.

Sui

Humphreys

G. W.

(2012). Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1105–1117. doi:10.1037/a0029792

28.

Sui

Humphreys

G. W.

(2015). The integrative self: How self-reference integrates perception and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 719–728. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.015

29.

Sui

Sun

Peng

Humphreys

G. W.

(2014). The automatic and the expected self: Separating self- and familiarity biases effects by manipulating stimulus probability. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1176–1184. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0631-5

30.

Symons

C. S.

Johnson

B. T.

(1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371–394. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371

31.

Williams

Pouget

Boucher

Woodman

G. F.

(2013). Visual-spatial attention aids the maintenance of object representations in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, 41, 698–715.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB

0.51 MB

Automatic Prioritization of Self-Referential Stimuli in Working Memory

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material