Working memory (WM) is a goal-directed memory system that actively maintains a limited amount of task-relevant information to serve the current goal. By this definition, WM maintenance should be terminated after the goal is accomplished, spontaneously removing no-longer-relevant information from WM. Past studies have failed to provide direct evidence of spontaneous removal of WM content by allowing participants to engage in a strategic reallocation of WM resources to competing information within WM. By contrast, we provide direct neural and behavioral evidence that visual WM content can be largely removed less than 1 s after it becomes obsolete, in the absence of a strategic allocation of resources (total N = 442 adults). These results demonstrate that visual WM is intrinsically a goal-directed system, and spontaneous removal provides a means for capacity-limited WM to keep up with ever-changing demands in a dynamic environment.
AstleD. E.SummerfieldJ.GriffinI.NobreA. C. (2012). Orienting attention to locations in mental representations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 146–162. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0218-3
2.
AwhE.VogelE. K. (2020). Online and off-line memory states in the human brain. In PoeppelD.MangunG. R.GazzanigaM. S. (Eds.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 347–356). MIT Press.
3.
BackerK. C.AlainC. (2012). Orienting attention to sound object representations attenuates change deafness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1554–1566. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027858
4.
BancroftT. D.HockleyW. E.FarquharR. (2013). The longer we have to forget the more we remember: The ironic effect of postcue duration in item-based directed forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 691–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029523
5.
BjorkR. A. (1989). Retrieval inhibition as an adaptive mechanism in human memory. In RoedigerH. L.CraikF. I. M. (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 309–330). Erlbaum.
6.
ConwayM. A.HarriesK.NoyesJ.Racsma’nyM.FrankishC. R. (2000). The disruption and dissolution of directed forgetting: Inhibitory control of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 409–430. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2706
7.
CowanN. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In MiyakeA.ShahP. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006
8.
CowanN. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
9.
DamesH.OberauerK. (2022). Directed forgetting in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(12), 2990–3008. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001256
10.
DelormeA.MakeigS. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
11.
DrewT.HorowitzT. S.WolfeJ. M.VogelE. K. (2012). Neural measures of dynamic changes in attentive tracking load. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00107
12.
EckerU. K. H.OberauerK.LewandowskyS. (2014). Working memory updating involves item-specific removal. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.03.006
13.
FukudaK.KangM.-S.WoodmanG. F. (2016). Distinct neural mechanisms for spatially lateralized and spatially global visual working memory representations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 116, 1715–1727. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00991.2015
14.
FukudaK.VogelE. K. (2011). Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture. Psychological Science, 22, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611398493
15.
HakimN.AdamK. C. S.GunseliE.AwhE.VogelE. K. (2019). Dissecting the neural focus of attention reveals distinct processes for spatial attention and object-based storage in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 30, 526–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619830384
16.
KatusT.AndersenS. K.MüllerM. M. (2012). Nonspatial cueing of tactile STM causes shift of spatial attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1596–1609. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00234
LeeY.-S.LeeH.-M.TsaiS.-H. (2007). Effects of post-cue interval on intentional forgetting. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712606X120410
19.
Lewis-PeacockJ. A.KesslerY.OberauerK. (2018). The removal of information from working memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1424, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13714
20.
Lopez-CalderonJ.LuckS. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213
21.
LuckS. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
22.
LuckS. J.VogelE. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/36846
23.
MacLeodM. D.MacraeC. N. (2001). Gone but not forgotten: The transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 12, 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00325
24.
MurisP.MerckelbachH.de JongP. F. (1993). Verbalization and environmental cuing in thought suppression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(93)90112-8
25.
NgiamW. X. Q.AdamK. C. S.QuirkC.VogelE. K.AwhE. (2021). Estimating the statistical power to detect set-size effects in contralateral delay activity. Psychophysiology, 58, Article e13791. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13791
26.
OberauerK. (2001). Removing irrelevant information from working memory: A cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 948–957. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.948
27.
PertzovY.BaysP. M.JosephS.HusainM. (2013). Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030947
28.
RickerT. J.SpiegelL. R.CowanN. (2014). Time-based loss in visual short-term memory is from trace decay, not temporal distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1510–1523. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000018
29.
SasinE.MoreyC. C.NieuwensteinM. (2017). Forget me if you can: Attentional capture by to-be-remembered and to-be-forgotten visual stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(5), 1643–1650. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1225-0
30.
ShipsteadZ.EngleR. W. (2013). Interference within the focus of attention: Working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028467
31.
SouzaA. S.OberauerK. (2015). Time-based forgetting in visual working memory reflects temporal distinctiveness, not decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 156–162. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0652-z
32.
SouzaA. S.RerkoL.OberauerK. (2014). Unloading and reloading working memory: Attending to one item frees capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1237–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036331
33.
ToziosC. J. I.FukudaK. (2020). Indirect, but not direct, down-regulation of visual long-term memory encoding through strategic biasing of attentional allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 1294–1310. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000712
34.
TsubomiH.FukudaK.WatanabeK.VogelE. K. (2013). Neural limits to representing objects still within view. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 8257–8263. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5348-12.2013
35.
UmemotoA.InzlichtM.HolroydC. B. (2019). Electrophysiological indices of anterior cingulate cortex function reveal changing levels of cognitive effort and reward valuation that sustain task performance. Neuropsychologia, 123, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.06.010
VogelE. K.MachizawaM. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748–751. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02447
38.
VogelE. K.McCulloughA. W.MachizawaM. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438, 500–503. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04171
39.
VogelE. K.WoodmanG. F.LuckS. J. (2006). The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1436–1451. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1436
40.
WegnerD. M.SchneiderD. J.CarterS. R.WhiteT. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5
41.
WilliamsJ. R.RobinsonM. M.SchurginM. W.WixtedJ. T.BradyT. F. (2022). You cannot “count” how many items people remember in visual working memory: The importance of signal detection–based measures for understanding change detection performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48, 1390–1409. https://doi:10.1037/xhp0001055
42.
WilliamsM.HongS. W.KangM.-S.CarlisleN. B.WoodmanG. F. (2013). The benefit of forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 348–355.
43.
XuZ.AdamK. C. S.FangX.VogelE. K. (2018). The reliability and stability of visual working memory capacity. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 576–588. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0886-6
ZhaoC.VogelE.AwhE. (2023). Change localization: A highly reliable and sensitive measure of capacity in visual working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 85, 1681–1694. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02586-0
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
