Every day, people perceive other people performing interactive actions. Retaining these actions of human agents in working memory (WM) plays a pivotal role in a normal social life. However, whether the semantic knowledge embedded in the interactive actions has a pervasive impact on the storage of the actions in WM remains unknown. In the current study, we investigated two opposing hypotheses: (a) that WM stores the interactions individually (the individual-storage hypothesis) and (b) that WM stores the interactions as chunks (the chunk-storage hypothesis). We required participants to memorize a set of individual actions while ignoring the underlying social interactions. We found that although the social-interaction aspect was task irrelevant, the interactive actions were stored in WM as chunks that were not affected by memory load (Experiments 1 and 2); however, inverting the human actions vertically abolished this chunking effect (Experiment 3). These results suggest that WM automatically and efficiently used semantic knowledge about interactive actions to store them and support the chunk-storage hypothesis.
BaddeleyA. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.
2.
BaysP. M.HusainM. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321, 851–854.
3.
BlakeR.ShiffrarM. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 47–73.
4.
BradyT. F.KonkleT.AlvarezG. A. (2009). Compression in visual working memory: Using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 487–502.
5.
BradyT. F.TenenbaumJ. B. (2013). A probabilistic model of visual working memory: Incorporating higher order regularities into working memory capacity estimates. Psychological Review, 120, 85–109.
6.
BrainardD. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
7.
CentellesL.AssaianteC.EtchegoyhenK.BouvardM.SchmitzC. (2013). From action to interaction: Exploring the contribution of body motion cues to social understanding in typical development and in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1140–1150.
8.
ChenZ. J.CowanN. (2009). Core verbal working-memory capacity: The limit in words retained without covert articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1420–1429.
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
CowanN. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114.
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
12.
GaoZ.GaoQ.TangN.ShuiR.ShenM. (2016). Organization principles in visual working memory: Evidence from sequential stimulus display. Cognition, 146, 277–288.
13.
GaoZ.YeT.ShenM.PerryA. (2016). Working memory capacity of biological movements predicts empathy traits. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 468–475.
14.
JohanssonG. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201–211.
15.
KaiserD.SteinT.PeelenM. V. (2014). Object grouping based on real-world regularities facilitates perception by reducing competitive interactions in visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 11217–11222.
16.
KaiserD.SteinT.PeelenM. V. (2015). Real-world spatial regularities affect visual working memory for objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1784–1790.
17.
LuckS. J.VogelE. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.
18.
LuriaR.VogelE. K. (2011). Shape and color conjunction stimuli are represented as bound objects in visual working memory. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1632–1639.
19.
LuriaR.VogelE. K. (2014). Come together, right now: Dynamic overwriting of an object’s history through common fate. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 1819–1828.
20.
ManeraV.SchoutenB.VerfaillieK.BecchioC. (2013). Time will show: Real time predictions during interpersonal action perception. PLoS ONE, 8, Article e54949. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054949
21.
NeriP.LuuJ. Y.LeviD. M. (2006). Meaningful interactions can enhance visual discrimination of human agents. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1186–1192.
22.
OlsonI. R.JiangY. (2002). Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the “strong-object” hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1055–1067.
23.
ParraM. A.AbrahamsS.FabiK.LogieR.LuzziS.Della SalaS. (2009). Short-term memory binding deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain, 132, 1057–1066.
24.
PetriniK.PiwekL.CrabbeF.PollickF. E.GarrodS. (2014). Look at those two!: The precuneus role in unattended third-person perspective of social interactions. Human Brain Mapping, 35, 5190–5203.
25.
QuadfliegS.GentileF.RossionB. (2015). The neural basis of perceiving person interactions. Cortex, 70, 5–20.
26.
RichlerJ. J.TanakaJ. W.BrownD. D.GauthierI. (2008). Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1356–1368.
27.
RouderJ. N.MoreyR. D.MoreyC. C.CowanN. (2011). How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 324–330.
28.
RouderJ. N.SpeckmanP. L.SunD.MoreyR. D.IversonG. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237.
29.
ShenM.GaoZ.DingX.ZhouB.HuangX. (2014). Holding biological motion information in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1332–1345.
StahlA. E.FeigensonL. (2014). Social knowledge facilitates chunking in infancy. Child Development, 85, 1477–1490.
32.
UrgolitesZ. J.WoodJ. N. (2013). Visual long-term memory stores high-fidelity representations of observed actions. Psychological Science, 24, 403–411.
33.
van BoxtelJ. J.LuH. (2013). A biological motion toolbox for reading, displaying, and manipulating motion capture data in research settings. Journal of Vision, 13(12), Article 7. doi:10.1167/13.12.7
34.
VogelE. K.WoodmanG. F.LuckS. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 92–114.
35.
WheelerM. E.TreismanA. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48–64.
36.
WoodJ. N. (2007). Visual working memory for observed actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 639–652.
37.
WoodJ. N. (2010). Visual working memory retains movement information within an allocentric reference frame. Visual Cognition, 18, 1464–1485.
38.
WoodJ. N. (2011). A core knowledge architecture of visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 357–381.
39.
WoodmanG. F.VeceraS. P.LuckS. J. (2003). Perceptual organization influences visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 80–87.
40.
XuY.ChunM. M. (2007). Visual grouping in human parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 18766–18771.
41.
YinJ.DingX.ZhouJ.ShuiR.LiX.ShenM. (2013). Social grouping: Perceptual grouping of objects by cooperative but not competitive relationships in dynamic chase. Cognition, 129, 194–204.
42.
ZhangW.LuckS. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453, 233–235.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
