Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The human ability to represent ensemble visual information, such as average orientation and size, has been suggested as the foundation of gist perception. To effectively summarize different groups of objects into the gist of a scene, observers should form ensembles separately for different groups, even when objects have similar visual features across groups. We hypothesized that the visual system utilizes perceptual groups characterized by spatial configuration and represents separate ensembles for different groups. Therefore, participants could not integrate ensembles of different perceptual groups on a task basis. We asked participants to determine the average orientation of visual elements comprising a surface with a contour situated inside. Although participants were asked to estimate the average orientation of all the elements, they ignored orientation signals embedded in the contour. This constraint may help the visual system to keep the visual features of occluding objects separate from those of the occluded objects.

Keywords

average orientation diffusion model contour integration gist perception spatial configuration open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allik

Toom

Raidvee

Averin

Kreegipuu

(2013). An almost general theory of mean size perception. Vision Research, 83, 25–39. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.02.018

Alvarez

G. A.

(2011). Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 122–131. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.003

Alvarez

G. A.

Oliva

(2008). The representation of simple ensemble visual features outside the focus of attention. Psychological Science, 19, 392–398. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02098.x

Ariely

(2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12, 157–162. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00327

Bauer

(2009). The danger of trial-by-trial knowledge of results in perceptual averaging studies. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 655–665. doi:10.3758/APP.71.3.655

Brady

T. F.

Alvarez

G. A.

(2011). Hierarchical encoding in visual working memory: Ensemble statistics bias memory for individual items. Psychological Science, 22, 384–392. doi:10.1177/0956797610397956

Brainard

(1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357

Burr

Ross

(2008). A visual sense of number. Current Biology, 18, 425–428. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.052

Carrasco

Ling

Read

(2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 308–313. doi:10.1038/nn1194

10.

Chong

S. C.

Treisman

(2003). Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 43, 393–404. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00596-5

11.

Chong

S. C.

Treisman

(2005). Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1–13. doi:10.3758/BF03195009

12.

Corbett

J. E.

(2017). The whole warps the sum of its parts: Gestalt-defined-group mean size biases memory for individual objects. Psychological Science, 28, 12–22. doi:10.1177/0956797616671524

13.

Dakin

S. C.

Watt

R. J.

(1997). The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture. Vision Research, 37, 3181–3192. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00133-8

14.

Elias

Dyer

Sweeny

T. D.

(2017). Ensemble perception of dynamic emotional groups. Psychological Science, 28, 193–203. doi:10.1177/0956797616678188

15.

Field

D. J.

Hayes

Hess

R. F.

(1993). Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field.” Vision Research, 33, 173–193. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(93)90156-Q

16.

Fründ

Haenel

N. V.

Wichmann

F. A.

(2011). Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior. Journal of Vision, 11(6), Article 16. doi:10.1167/11.6.16

17.

Kleiner

Brainard

Pelli

(2007, August). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Tutorial session presented at the 30th European Conference on Visual Perception, Arezzo, Italy.

18.

Larson

A. M.

Freeman

T. E.

Ringer

R. V.

Loschky

L. C.

(2014). The spatiotemporal dynamics of scene gist recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 471–487. doi:10.1037/a0034986

19.

Larson

A. M.

Loschky

L. C.

(2009). The contributions of central versus peripheral vision to scene gist recognition. Journal of Vision, 9(10), Article 6. doi:10.1167/9.10.6

20.

Lee

Baek

Chong

S. C.

(2016). Perceived magnitude of visual displays: Area, numerosity, and mean size. Journal of Vision, 16(3), Article 12. doi:10.1167/16.3.12

21.

Lew

T. F.

Vul

(2015). Ensemble clustering in visual working memory biases location memories and reduces the Weber noise of relative positions. Journal of Vision, 15(4), Article 10. doi:10.1167/15.4.10

22.

Gilbert

C. D.

(2002). Global contour saliency and local colinear interactions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 2846–2856. doi:10.1152/jn.00289.2002

23.

Ling

Carrasco

(2006). Sustained and transient covert attention enhance the signal via different contrast response functions. Vision Research, 46, 1210–1220. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.008

24.

Livne

Sagi

(2007). Configuration influence on crowding. Journal of Vision, 7(2), Article 4. doi:10.1167/7.2.4

25.

Luck

S. J.

Vogel

E. K.

(1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281. doi:10.1038/36846

26.

Mareschal

Morgan

M. J.

Solomon

J. A.

(2010). Attentional modulation of crowding. Vision Research, 50, 805–809. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.01.022

27.

Morgan

Dillenburger

Raphael

Solomon

J. A.

(2012). Observers can voluntarily shift their psychometric functions without losing sensitivity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 185–193. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0222-7

28.

Myung

I. J.

(2003). Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 90–100. doi:10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00028-7

29.

Parkes

Lund

Angelucci

Solomon

J. A.

Morgan

(2001). Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 739–744. doi:10.1038/89532

30.

Pelli

(1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366

31.

Polat

Sagi

(1994). The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions. Vision Research, 34, 73–78. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)90258-5

32.

Ratcliff

Rouder

J. N.

(1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00067

33.

Utochkin

I. S.

(2015). Ensemble summary statistics as a basis for rapid visual categorization. Journal of Vision, 15(4), Article 8. doi:10.1167/15.4.8

34.

Wolfe

J. M.

Võ

M. L. H.

Evans

K. K.

Greene

M. R.

(2011). Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 77–84. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.001

35.

Zhang

Luck

S. J.

(2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453, 233–235. doi:10.1038/nature06860

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.58 MB

Perceived Average Orientation Reflects Effective Gist of the Surface

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material