The idea that birth-order position has a lasting impact on personality has been discussed for the past 100 years. Recent large-scale studies have indicated that birth-order effects on the Big Five personality traits are negligible. In the current study, we examined a variety of more narrow personality traits in a large representative sample (n = 6,500–10,500 in between-family analyses; n = 900–1,200 in within-family analyses). We used specification-curve analysis to assess evidence for birth-order effects across a range of models implementing defensible yet arbitrary analytical decisions (e.g., whether to control for age effects or to exclude participants on the basis of sibling spacing). Although specification-curve analysis clearly confirmed the previously reported birth-order effect on intellect, we found no meaningful effects on life satisfaction, locus of control, interpersonal trust, reciprocity, risk taking, patience, impulsivity, or political orientation. The lack of meaningful birth-order effects on self-reports of personality was not limited to broad traits but also held for more narrowly defined characteristics.
AsendorpfJ. B.ConnerM.De FruytF.De HouwerJ.DenissenJ. J. A.FiedlerK.WichertsJ. M. (2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27, 108–119. doi:10.1002/per.1919
2.
BlackS. E.GrönqvistE.ÖckertB. (2017). Born to lead? The effect of birth order on non-cognitive abilities (IZA Discussion Paper No. 10560). Retrieved from Institute for Labor Economics Web site: http://ftp.iza.org/dp10560.pdf
3.
CourtiolA.RaymondM.FaurieC. (2009). Birth order affects behaviour in the investment game: Firstborns are less trustful and reciprocate less. Animal Behaviour, 78, 1405–1411. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.09.016
4.
DamianR. I.RobertsB. W. (2015). The associations of birth order with personality and intelligence in a representative sample of U.S. high school students. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 96–105. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.05.005
5.
DohmenT.FalkA.HuffmanD.SundeU. (2009). Homo reciprocans: Survey evidence on behavioural outcomes. The Economic Journal, 119, 592–612. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02242.x
6.
DohmenT.FalkA.HuffmanD.SundeU.SchuppJ.WagnerG. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, 522–550. doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x
ElsonM.MohseniM. R.BreuerJ.ScharkowM.QuandtT. (2014). Press CRTT to measure aggressive behavior: The unstandardized use of the competitive reaction time task in aggression research. Psychological Assessment, 26, 419–432. doi:10.1037/a0035569
9.
Ergüner-TekinalpB.TerziS˛. (2016). Coping, social interest, and psychological birth order as predictors of resilience in Turkey. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11, 509–524. doi:10.1007/s11482-014-9378-3
10.
FalboT. (1981). Relationships between birth category, achievement, and interpersonal orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 121–131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.1.121
11.
FanelliD. (2012). Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics, 90, 891–904. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7
12.
HarrisJ. R. (1999). The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York, NY: Free Press.
13.
HealeyM. D.EllisB. J. (2007). Birth order, conscientiousness, and openness to experience: Tests of the family-niche model of personality using a within-family methodology. Evolution & Human Behavior, 28, 55–59. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.003
14.
HughesB. M. (2005). Birth order and locus of control revisited: Sex of siblings as a moderating factor. Psychological Reports, 97, 419–422.
15.
IoannidisJ. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8), Article e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
16.
JohnL. K.LoewensteinG.PrelecD. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23, 524–532.
17.
KrohM. (2007). Measuring left–right political orientation: The choice of response format. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 204–220.
18.
LehmannJ. Y. K.Nuevo-ChiqueroA.Vidal-FernandezM. (2016). The early origins of birth order differences in children’s outcomes and parental behavior. Journal of Human Resources. Advance online publication. doi:10.3368/jhr.53.1.0816-8177
19.
LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2012). Estimating the reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from four national panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 105, 323–331. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9783-z
20.
MunafòM. R.NosekB. A.BishopD. V. M.ButtonK. S.ChambersC. D.PercieN.IoannidisJ. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, Article 0021. doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0021
21.
NaefM.SchuppJ. (2009). Measuring trust: Experiments and surveys in contrast and combination (IZA Discussion Paper No. 4087). Retrieved from Institute for Labor Economics Web site: http://ftp.iza.org/dp4087.pdf
22.
NewhouseR. C. (1974). Locus of control and birth order in school children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 364–365.
23.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, Article aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716
24.
RohrerJ. M.EgloffB.SchmukleS. C. (2015). Examining the effects of birth order on personality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 14224–14229. doi:10.1073/pnas.1506451112
25.
SalmonC.CuthbertsonA. M.FigueredoA. J. (2016). The relationship between birth order and prosociality: An evolutionary perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 18–22. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.066
26.
SchoolerC. (1972). Birth order effects: Not here, not now!Psychological Bulletin, 78, 161–175. doi:10.1037/h0033026
27.
ShaoY.YaoX.LiY.HuangZ. (2013). Personality and life satisfaction in China: The birth order effect under the influence of national policy. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 536–541. doi:10.1016/j.paid.29012.11.001
28.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632
29.
SimonsohnU.SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. Retrieved from Social Science Research Network Web site:http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2694998
30.
SpechtJ.EgloffB.SchmukleS. C. (2013). Everything under control? The effects of age, gender, and education on trajectories of perceived control in a nationally representative German sample. Developmental Psychology, 49, 353–364. doi:10.1037/a0028243
31.
SullowayF. J. (1997). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
32.
SullowayF. J. (1999). Birth order. In RuncoM. A.PritzkerS. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 189–202). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
SullowayF. J.ZweigenhaftR. L. (2010). Birth order and risk taking in athletics: A meta-analysis and study of Major League Baseball. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 402–416. doi:10.1177/1088868310361241
34.
VischerT.DohmenT.FalkA.HuffmanD.SchuppJ.SundeU.WagnerG. G. (2013). Validating an ultra-short survey measure of patience. Economics Letters, 120, 142–145.
35.
WagnerG. G.FrickJ. R.SchuppJ. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP)—scope, evolution and enhancements. Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 127, 139–169.
36.
WalterD. A.ZieglerC. A. (1980). The effects of birth order on locus of control. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 293–294.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
