Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We propose that the gossip that is triggered when people witness behaviors that deviate from social norms builds social bonds. To test this possibility, we showed dyads of unacquainted students a short video of everyday campus life that either did or did not include an incident of negative or positive deviance (dropping or cleaning up litter). Study 1 showed that participants in the deviance conditions reported having a greater understanding of campus social norms than those in the control condition; they also expressed a greater desire to gossip about the video. Study 2 found that when given the opportunity, participants did gossip about the deviance, and this gossip was associated with increased norm clarification and (indirectly) social cohesion. These findings suggest that gossip may be a mechanism through which deviance can have positive downstream social consequences.

Keywords

gossip deviance social norms norm clarification social bonds open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baumeister

R. F.

Zhang

Vohs

K. D.

(2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8, 111–121.

Ben-Yehuda

(1990). Positive and negative deviance: More fuel for a controversy. Deviant Behavior, 11, 221–243.

Ben-Ze’ev

(1994). The vindication of gossip. In Goodman

R. F.

Ben-Ze’ev

(Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 11–24). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

Dunbar

(1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Durkheim

(1964). The rules of sociological method ( Solovay

S. A.

Mueller

J. H.

, Trans.). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1895)

Feinberg

Willer

Stellar

Keltner

(2012). The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1015–1030.

Foster

E. K.

(2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8, 78–99.

Heath

Bell

Sternberg

(2001). Emotional selection in memes: The case of urban legends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1028–1041.

Heckert

D. M.

Heckert

D. A.

(2015). Positive deviance. In Goode

(Ed.), The handbook of deviance (pp. 80–100). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.

10.

Jetten

Hornsey

M. J.

(2014). Deviance and dissent in groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 461–485.

11.

Kam

C. C. S.

Bond

M. H.

(2009). Emotional reactions of anger and shame to the norm violation characterizing episodes of interpersonal harm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 203–219.

12.

Kiers

. (Director). (1971). A day with Frank Zappa [Motion picture]. The Netherlands: Vrijzinnig Protestantse Radio Omroep.

13.

Maas

C. M.

Hox

J. J.

(2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92.

14.

Marques

J. M.

Yzerbyt

V. Y.

Leyens

J.-P.

(1988). The “black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1–16.

15.

Oehlert

G. W.

(1992). A note on the delta method. American Statistician, 46, 27–29.

16.

Peters

Kashima

(2007). From social talk to social action: Shaping the social triad with emotion sharing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 780–797.

17.

Peters

Kashima

(2015). Bad habit or social good? How perceptions of gossiper morality are related to gossip content. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 784–798. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2123

18.

Peters

Kashima

Clark

(2009). Talking about others: Emotionality and the dissemination of social information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 207–222.

19.

Rabe-Hesketh

Skrondal

(2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.

20.

Rabe-Hesketh

Skrondal

Pickles

(2004). Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 69, 167–190.

21.

Rosnow

R. L.

(2001). Rumor and gossip in interpersonal interaction and beyond: A social exchange perspective. In Kowalski

R. M.

(Ed.), Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships (pp. 203–232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

22.

Smith

E. R.

(2014). Evil acts and malicious gossip: A multiagent model of the effects of gossip in socially distributed person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 311–325.

23.

Smith

J. R.

Louis

W. R.

Terry

D. J.

Greenaway

K. H.

Clarke

M. R.

Cheng

(2012). Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 353–361.

24.

Stukas

A. A.

Bratanova

Peters

Kashima

Beatson

R. M.

(2010). Confirmatory processes in attitude transmission: The role of shared reality. Social Influence, 5, 101–117.

25.

Wert

S. R.

Salovey

(2004). A social comparison account of gossip. Review of General Psychology, 8, 122–137.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

334.54 MB

0.00 MB

Gossiping About Deviance: Evidence That Deviance Spurs the Gossip That Builds Bonds

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material