Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The general view in psychological science is that natural categories obey a coherent, family-resemblance principle. In this investigation, we documented an example of an important exception to this principle: Results of a multidimensional-scaling study of igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks (Experiment 1) suggested that the structure of these categories is disorganized and dispersed. This finding motivated us to explore what might be the optimal procedures for teaching dispersed categories, a goal that is likely critical to science education in general. Subjects in Experiment 2 learned to classify pictures of rocks into compact or dispersed high-level categories. One group learned the categories through focused high-level training, whereas a second group was required to simultaneously learn classifications at a subtype level. Although high-level training led to enhanced performance when the categories were compact, subtype training was better when the categories were dispersed. We provide an interpretation of the results in terms of an exemplar-memory model of category learning.

Keywords

category learning similarity computational modeling open data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. R.

(1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98, 409–429.

Ashby

F. G.

Maddox

W. T.

(1993). Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 372–400.

Blaxton

T. A.

(1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 657–668.

Brainard

D. H.

(1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.

Collins

A. M.

Quillian

M. R.

(1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–247.

Daniel

L. H.

Hacket

Moyer

R. H.

Vasquez

(2005). Science: Illinois. New York, NY: Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.

Giguère

Love

B. C.

(2013). Limits in decision making arise from limits in memory retrieval. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 7613–7618.

Kruschke

J. K.

(1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22–44.

Kruskal

J. B.

Wish

(1978). Multidimensional scaling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

10.

Lassaline

M. E.

Wisniewski

E. J.

Medin

D. L.

(1992). Basic levels in artificial and natural categories: Are all basic levels created equal? In Burns

(Ed.), Percepts, concepts, and categories: The representation and processing of information (pp. 327–328). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

11.

Love

B. C.

Medin

D. L.

Gureckis

T. M.

(2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111, 309–332.

12.

Marshak

(2013). Essentials of geology (4th ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

13.

McKinley

S. C.

Nosofsky

R. M.

(1995). Investigations of exemplar and decision bound models in large, ill-defined category structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 128–148.

14.

Noh

S. M.

Yan

V. X.

Vendetti

M. S.

Castel

A. D.

Bjork

R. A.

(2014). Multilevel induction of categories: Venomous snakes hijack the learning of lower category levels. Psychological Science, 25, 1592–1599.

15.

Nosofsky

R. M.

(1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57.

16.

Nosofsky

R. M.

(1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 87–109.

17.

Nosofsky

R. M.

(1992). Similarity scaling and cognitive process models. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 25–53.

18.

Nosofsky

R. M.

(2011). The generalized context model: An exemplar model of classification. In Pothos

Wills

(Eds.), Formal approaches in categorization (pp. 18–39). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Nosofsky

R. M.

Palmeri

T. J.

(1997). An exemplar-based random-walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266–300.

20.

Palmeri

T. J.

(1999). Learning categories at different hierarchical levels: A comparison of category learning models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 495–503.

21.

Rosch

Mervis

(1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.

22.

Rosch

Mervis

Gray

Johnson

Byes-Braem

(1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382–439.

23.

Sanborn

A. N.

Griffiths

T. L.

Navarro

D. J.

(2010). Rational approximations to rational models: Alternative algorithms for category learning. Psychological Review, 117, 1144–1167.

24.

Shepard

R. N.

(1974). Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects. Psychometrika, 39, 373–421.

25.

Shepard

R. N.

(1980). Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering. Science, 210, 390–398.

26.

Shepard

R. N.

Hovland

C. I.

Jenkins

H. M.

(1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 75(13).

27.

Smith

E. E.

Medin

D. L.

(1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

28.

Storms

De Boek

Ruts

(2000). Prototype and exemplar-based information in natural language concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 51–73.

29.

Storms

Navarro

D. J.

Lee

M. D.

(2010). Introduction to the special issue on formal modeling of semantic concepts. Acta Psychologica, 133, 213–215.

30.

Swets

J. A.

Getty

D. J.

Pickett

R. M.

D’Orsi

C. J.

Seltzer

S. E.

McNeil

B. J.

(1991). Enhancing and evaluating diagnostic accuracy. Medical Decision Making, 11, 9–18.

31.

Tarbuck

E. J.

Lutgens

F. K.

(2015). Earth science (14th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

32.

Thomas

A. K.

McDaniel

M. A.

(2007). The negative cascade of incongruent generative study-test processing in memory and metacomprehension. Memory & Cognition, 35, 668–678.

33.

Verheyen

Ameel

Rogers

T. T.

Storms

(2008). Learning a hierarchical organization of categories. In Love

B. C.

McRae

Sloutsky

V. M.

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 751–756). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.59 MB

0.49 MB

On Learning Natural-Science Categories That Violate the Family-Resemblance Principle

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material