Beginning in infancy, children expect individuals in a group to care for and be loyal to in-group members. One prominent cue that children use to infer that individuals belong to the same group is similarity. Does any salient similarity among individuals elicit an expectation of in-group preference, or does contextual information modulate these expectations? In Experiments 1 and 2, 12-month-old infants expected in-group preference between two individuals who wore the same novel outfit, but they dismissed this similarity if one of the outfits was used to fulfill an instrumental purpose. In Experiment 3, 26-month-old toddlers expected in-group preference between two individuals who uttered the same novel labels, but they dismissed this similarity if the labels were used to convey incidental as opposed to categorical information about the individuals. Together, the results of these experiments (N = 96) provide converging evidence that from early in life, children possess a context-sensitive mechanism for determining whether similarities mark groups.
BallietD.WuJ.De DreuC. K. W. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1556–1581.
2.
BegusK.GligaT.SouthgateV. (2016). Infants’ preferences for native speakers are associated with an expectation of information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 12397–12402.
3.
BianL.SloaneS.BaillargeonR. (2018). Infants expect ingroup support to override fairness when resources are limited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115, 2705–2710.
4.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444.
5.
ButtelmannD.ZmyjN.DaumM.CarpenterM. (2013). Selective imitation of in-group over out-group members in 14-month-old infants. Child Development, 84, 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01860.x
CirelliL. K.EinarsonK. M.TrainorL. J. (2014). Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants. Developmental Science, 17, 1003–1011.
8.
CirelliL. K.WanS. J.TrainorL. J. (2016). Social effects of movement synchrony: Increased infant helpfulness only transfers to affiliates of synchronously moving partners. Infancy, 21, 807–821.
DunhamY.BaronA. S.CareyS. (2011). Consequences of “minimal” group affiliations in children. Child Development, 82, 793–811.
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
GersonS. A.BekkeringH.HunniusS. (2017). Do you do as I do? Young toddlers prefer and copy toy choices of similarly acting others. Infancy, 22, 5–22.
14.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.KolevaS.MotylM.IyerR.WojcikS. P.DittoP. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In DevineP.PlantA. (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 47, 55–130). Academic Press.
15.
JaroszA. F.WileyJ. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7, 2–9.
16.
JinK.BaillargeonR. (2017). Infants possess an abstract expectation of ingroup support. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114, 8199–8204.
17.
JordanA.DunhamY. (2021). Are category labels primary? Children use similarities to reason about social groups. Developmental Science, 24(2), Article e13013. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13013
18.
KinzlerK. D.DupouxE.SpelkeE. S. (2007). The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 12577–12580.
19.
LegareC. H.WenN. J.HerrmannP. A.WhitehouseH. (2015). Imitative flexibility and the development of cultural learning. Cognition, 142, 351–361.
20.
LibermanZ.KinzlerK. D.WoodwardA. L. (2018). The early social significance of shared ritual actions. Cognition, 171, 42–51.
21.
LibermanZ.KinzlerK. D.WoodwardA. L. (2021). Origins of homophily: Infants expect people with shared preferences to affiliate. Cognition, 212, Article 104695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104695
22.
LibermanZ.WoodwardA. L.KinzlerK. D. (2017). Preverbal infants infer third-party social relationships based on language. Cognitive Science, 41, 622–634.
23.
MahajanN.WynnK. (2012). Origins of “us” versus “them”: Prelinguistic infants prefer similar others. Cognition, 124, 227–233.
24.
MargoniF.BaillargeonR.SurianL. (2018). Infants distinguish between leaders and bullies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115, E8835–E8843.
25.
PowellL. J.SpelkeE. S. (2013). Preverbal infants expect members of social groups to act alike. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 3965–3972.
26.
PunA.BirchS. J.BaronA. S. (2021). The power of allies: Infants’ expectations of social obligations during intergroup conflict. Cognition, 211, Article 104630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104630
27.
RaiT. S.FiskeA. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118, 57–75.
28.
RhodesM.HetheringtonC.BrinkK.WellmanH. M. (2015). Infants’ use of social partnerships to predict behavior. Developmental Science, 18, 909–916.
29.
RobertsS. O.WilliamsA. D.GelmanS. A. (2017). Children’s and adults’ predictions of Black, White, and multiracial children’s friendship patterns. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18, 189–208.
30.
RouderJ. N.SpeckmanP. L.SunD.MoreyR. D.IversonG. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237.
31.
ShuttsK.KinzlerK. D.McKeeC. B.SpelkeE. S. (2009). Social information guides infants’ selection of foods. Journal of Cognition and Development, 10(1–2), 1–17.
32.
ShwederR. A.MuchN. C.MahapatraM.ParkL. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community and divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In BrandtA. M.RozinP. (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). Routledge.
SparksE.SchinkelM. G.MooreC. (2017). Affiliation affects generosity in young children: The roles of minimal group membership and shared interests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 159, 242–262.
35.
SpokesA. C.SpelkeE. S. (2017). The cradle of social knowledge: Infants’ reasoning about caregiving and affiliation. Cognition, 159, 102–116.
36.
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. P.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.
37.
TingF.Buyukozer DawkinsM.StavansM.BaillargeonR. (2020). Principles and concepts in early moral cognition. In DecetyJ. (Ed.), The social brain (pp. 41–65). MIT Press.
38.
TingF.HeZ.BaillargeonR. (2019). Toddlers and infants expect individuals to refrain from helping an ingroup victim’s aggressor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 116, 6025–6034.
39.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL.PriceM. E. (2006). Cognitive adaptations for n-person exchange: The evolutionary roots of organizational behavior. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27(2–3), 103–129.
40.
Watson-JonesR. E.LegareC. H. (2016). The social functions of group rituals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415618486
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
