Research on sustainability behaviors has been based on the assumption that increasing personal concerns about the environment will increase proenvironmental action. We tested whether this assumption is more applicable to individualistic cultures than to collectivistic cultures. In Study 1, we compared 47 countries (N = 57,268) and found that they varied considerably in the degree to which environmental concern predicted support for proenvironmental action. National-level individualism explained the between-nation variability above and beyond the effects of other cultural values and independently of person-level individualism. In Study 2, we compared individualistic and collectivistic nations (United States vs. Japan; N = 251) and found culture-specific predictors of proenvironmental behavior. Environmental concern predicted environmentally friendly consumer choice among European Americans but not Japanese. For Japanese participants, perceived norms about environmental behavior predicted proenvironmental decision making. Facilitating sustainability across nations requires an understanding of how culture determines which psychological factors drive human action.
BordR. J.O’ConnorR. E.FisherA. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205–218.
4.
ChanR.LauL. (2002). Explaining green purchasing behavior: A cross-cultural study on American and Chinese consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 14, 9–40.
5.
CialdiniR. B.WosinskaW.BarrettD. W.ButnerJ.Gornik-DuroseM. (1999). Compliance with a request in two cultures: The differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1242–1253.
6.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.
7.
EmanuelK. A. (2013). Downscaling CMIP5 climate models shows increased tropical cyclone activity over the 21st century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 12219–12224.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R. (1997). Culture, dissonance, and self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 389–400.
13.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135.
14.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
15.
InglehartR. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28, 57–72.
16.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2013). Summary for policymakers. In StockerT. F.QinD.PlattnerG. K.TignorM.AllenS. K.BoschungJ.Midgley. . . P. M. (Eds.), Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 3–29). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17.
KashimaY.PaladinoA.MargettsE. A. (2014). Environmentalist identity and environmental striving. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 64–75.
18.
KashimaY.SiegalM.TanakaK.KashimaE. S. (1992). Do people believe behaviours are consistent with attitudes? Towards a cultural psychology of attribution processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 111–124.
19.
KimH. S.MarkusH. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity: A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785–800.
20.
KimH. S.ShermanD. K. (2007). “Express yourself”: Culture and the effect of self-expression on choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1–11.
21.
LiL. M.HamamuraT. (2010). Cultural fit and life satisfaction: Endorsement of cultural values predicts life satisfaction only in collectivistic societies. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 11, 109–122.
22.
MarkowitzE. M.GoldbergL. R.AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2012). Profiling the “pro-environmental individual”: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality, 80, 81–111.
23.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
24.
MilfontT. L.PageE. (2013). A bibliometric review of the first thirty years of theJournal of Environmental Psychology. Psyecology, 4, 195–216.
25.
MoormanR. H.BlakelyG. L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 127–142.
26.
NolanJ. M.SchultzP. W.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–923.
27.
O’ConnorR.BordR.FisherA. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19, 461–471.
28.
OnwezenM. C.BartelsJ.AntonidesG. (2014). Environmentally friendly consumer choices: Cultural differences in the self-regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 239–248.
29.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.
30.
RiemerH.ShavittS.KooM.MarkusH. R. (2014). Preferences don’t have to be personal: Expanding attitude theorizing with a cross-cultural perspective. Psychological Review, 121, 619–648.
31.
SavaniK.MarkusH. R.ConnerA. L. (2008). Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 861–876.
32.
SavaniK.MarkusH. R.NaiduN. V. R.KumarS.BerliaN. (2010). What counts as a choice? U.S. Americans are more likely than Indians to construe actions as choices. Psychological Science, 21, 391–398.
33.
SavaniK.MorrisM. W.NaiduN. V. R. (2012). Deference in Indians’ decision making: Introjected goals or injunctive norms?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 685–699.
34.
SchultzP. W.NolanJ. M.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429–434.
35.
SternP. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.
36.
StottP. A.StoneD. A.AllenM. R. (2004). Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003. Nature, 432, 610–614.
37.
TriandisH. C.BontempoR.VillarealM. J.AsaiM.LuccaN. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 232–328.
ZavalL.MarkowitzE. M.WeberE. U. (2015). How will I be remembered? Conserving the environment for the sake of one’s legacy. Psychological Science, 26, 231–236.
40.
ZeleznyL. C.ChuaP. P.AldrichC. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 443–457.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
