Metacognition is the ability to think about thinking. Although monitoring and controlling one’s knowledge is a key feature of human cognition, its evolutionary origins are debated. In the current study, we examined whether rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta; N = 120) could make metacognitive inferences in a one-shot decision. Each monkey experienced one of four conditions, observing a human appearing to hide a food reward in an apparatus consisting of either one or two tubes. The monkeys tended to search the correct location when they observed this baiting event, but engaged in information seeking—by peering into a center location where they could check both potential hiding spots—if their view had been occluded and information seeking was possible. The monkeys only occasionally approached the center when information seeking was not possible. These results show that monkeys spontaneously use information about their own knowledge states to solve naturalistic foraging problems, and thus provide the first evidence that nonhumans exhibit information-seeking responses in situations with which they have no prior experience.
BasileB. M.HamptonR. R.SuomiS. J.MurrayE. A. (2009). An assessment of memory awareness in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Cognition, 12, 169–180.
2.
BeranM. J.SmithJ. D.PerdueB. M. (2013). Language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) name what they have seen but look first at what they have not seen. Psychological Science, 24, 660–666.
3.
BräuerJ.CallJ.TomaselloM. (2004). Visual perspective taking in dogs (Canis familiaris) in the presence of barriers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 88, 299–317.
4.
CallJ. (2010). Do apes know that they could be wrong?Animal Cognition, 13, 689–700.
5.
CallJ.CarpenterM. (2001). Do apes and children know what they have seen?Animal Cognition, 3, 207–220.
6.
CarruthersP. (2008). Meta-cognition in animals: A skeptical look. Mind & Language, 23, 58–89.
7.
CastroL.WassermanE. A. (2013). Information-seeking behavior: Exploring metacognitive control in pigeons. Animal Cognition, 16, 241–254.
8.
FlavellJ. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
9.
FlavellJ. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children’s knowledge about the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 21–45.
10.
FlombaumJ. I.SantosS. (2005). Rhesus monkeys attribute perceptions to others. Current Biology, 15, 447–452.
11.
FooteA. L.CrystalJ. D. (2012). “Play it Again”: A new method for testing metacognition in animals. Animal Cognition, 15, 187–199.
12.
FrithC. D. (2012). The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 2213–2223.
13.
GottliebJ.OudeyeP. Y.LopesM.BaranesA. (2013). Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: Computational and neural mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 585–593.
14.
GoupilL.Romand-MonnierM.KouiderS. (2016). Infants ask for help when they know they don’t know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 3492–3496.
15.
HamptonR. R. (2001). Rhesus monkeys know when they remember. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 98, 5359–5362.
16.
HamptonR. R.ZivinA.MurrayE. A. (2004). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) discriminate between knowing and not knowing and collect information as needed before acting. Animal Cognition, 7, 239–246.
17.
HareB. (2001). Can competitive paradigms increase the validity of experiments on primate social cognition?Animal Cognition, 4, 269–280.
18.
HareB. (2011). From hominoid to hominid mind: What changed and why?Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 293–309.
19.
HareB.CallJ.TomaselloM. (2006). Chimpanzees deceive a human competitor by hiding. Cognition, 101, 495–514.
20.
JozefowiezJ.StaddonJ. E. R.CeruttiD. T. (2009). Metacognition in animals: How do we know that they know?Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 4, 29–39.
21.
KaminskiJ.CallJ.TomaselloM. (2008). Chimpanzees know what others know, but not what they believe. Cognition, 109, 224–234.
22.
KangM. J.HsuM.KrajbichI. M.LoewensteinG.McClureS. M.WangJ. T.CamererC. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20, 963–973.
23.
KelemenW. L.WinninghamR. G.WeaverC. A. (2007). Repeated testing sessions and scholastic aptitude in college students’ metacognitive accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 689–717.
24.
KepecsA.MainenZ. F. (2012). A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 1322–1337.
25.
KepecsA.UchidaU.ZariwalaH. A.MainenZ. F. (2008). Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence. Nature, 455, 227–231.
26.
KiddC.HaydenB. Y. (2015). The psychology and neuroscience of curiosity. Neuron, 88, 449–460.
27.
KoriatA. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In ZelazoP. D.ThompsonE. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289–325). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KornellN. (2009). Metacognition in humans and animals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 11–15.
29.
KornellN.SonL. K.TerraceH. S. (2007). Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys. Psychological Science, 18, 64–71.
30.
KuhnD. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178–181.
31.
Le PelleyM. E. (2012). Metacognitive monkeys or associative animals? Simple reinforcement learning explains uncertainty in nonhuman animals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 686–708.
32.
LoewensteinG. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98.
33.
MarshH. L.MacDonaldS. E. (2012). Orangutans (Pongo abelii) “play the odds”: Information-seeking strategies in relation to cost, risk, and benefit. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 263–278.
34.
MarticorenaD. C.RuizA. M.MukerjiC.GodduA.SantosL. R. (2011). Monkeys represent others’ knowledge but not their beliefs. Developmental Science, 14, 1406–1416.
35.
MartinA.SantosL. R. (2014). The origins of belief representation: Monkeys fail to automatically represent others’ beliefs. Cognition, 130, 300–308.
36.
McMahonS.MacphersonK.RobertsW. A. (2010). Dogs choose a human informant: Metacognition in canines. Behavioural Processes, 85, 293–298.
37.
MelisA.CallJ.TomaselloM. (2006). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) conceal visual and auditory information from others. Animal Behaviour, 120, 154–162.
38.
MetcalfeJ.ShimamuraA. P. (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
NelsonT. O.NarensL. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40.
PauknerA.AndersonJ. R.FujitaK. (2006). Redundant food searches by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): A failure of metacognition?Animal Cognition, 9, 110–117.
41.
PerryC. J.BarronA. B. (2013). Honey bees selectively avoid difficult choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 19155–19159.
RawlinsR. C.KesslerM. J. (Eds.). (1987). The Cayo Santiago macaques: History, behavior and biology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
44.
RobertsW. A.McMillanN.MusolineE.ColeM. (2012). Information seeking in animals: Metacognition?Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 7, 85–109.
45.
SantosL. R.NissenA. G.FerrugiaJ. A. (2006). Rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta, know what others can and cannot hear. Animal Behaviour, 71, 1175–1181.
46.
SantosL. R.RosatiA. G. (2015). The evolutionary roots of human decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 321–347.
47.
SchwartzB. L. (1994). Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 357–375.
48.
ShieldsW.SmithJ.WashburnD. (1997). Uncertain responses by humans and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in a psychophysical same-different task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 147–164.
49.
SmithJ. D.BeranM. J.CosuchmanJ. J.CoutinhoV. C. (2008). The comparative study of metacognition: Sharper paradigms, safer inferences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 679–691.
50.
SmithJ. D.SchullJ.StroteJ.McGeeK.EgnorR.ErbL. (1995). The uncertain response in the bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 391–408.
51.
SmithJ. D.ShieldsW. E.AllendoerferK. R.WashburnW. A. (1998). Memory monitoring by animals and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 227–250.
52.
SmithJ. D.ShieldsW. E.SchullJ.WashburnD. A. (1997). The uncertain response in humans and animals. Cognition, 62, 75–97.
53.
TerraceH. S.SonL. K. (2009). Comparative metacognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 67–74.
54.
VoV. A.LiR.KornellN.PougetA.CantlonJ. F. (2014). Young children bet on their numerical skills: Metacognition in the numerical domain. Psychological Science, 25, 1712–1721.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
