People Have Systematically Different Ownership Intuitions in Seemingly Simple Cases

Abstract

Our understanding of ownership influences how we interact with objects and with each other. Here, we studied people’s intuitions about ownership transfer using a set of simple, parametrically varied events. We found that people (N = 120 U.S. adults) had similar intuitions about ownership for some events but sharply opposing intuitions for others (Experiment 1). People (N = 120 U.S. adults) were unaware of these conflicts and overestimated ownership consensus (Experiment 2). Moreover, differences in people’s ownership intuitions predicted their intuitions about the acceptability of using, altering, controlling, and destroying the owned object (N = 130 U.S. adults; Experiment 3), even when ownership was not explicitly mentioned (N = 130 U.S. adults; Experiment 4). Subject-level analyses suggest that these disagreements reflect at least two underlying intuitive theories, one in which intentions are central to ownership and another in which physical possession is prioritized.

Keywords

social cognition intuitive theories ownership theory of mind open data open materials preregistration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beggan

J. K.

Brown

E. M.

(1994). Association as a psychological justification for ownership. The Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1994.9712741

Berti

A. E.

Bombi

A. S.

Lis

(1982). The child’s conceptions about means of production and their owners. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12(3), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420120301

Blake

P. R.

Harris

P. L.

(2009). Children’s understanding of ownership transfers. Cognitive Development, 24(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.01.002

Blake

P. R.

Harris

P. L.

(2011). Early representations of ownership. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(132), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.295

Brosnan

S. F.

(2011). Property in nonhuman primates. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(132), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.293

Cram

S. H.

(1989). Children’s endorsement of ownership attributes. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(89)90057-3

DeScioli

Karpoff

(2015). People’s judgments about classic property law cases. Human Nature, 26, 184–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-015-9230-y

DeScioli

Karpoff

De Freitas

(2017). Ownership dilemmas: The case of finders versus landowners. Cognitive Science, 41, 502–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12486

Friedman

(2008). First possession: An assumption guiding inferences about who owns what. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 290–295. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.290

10.

Friedman

(2010). Necessary for possession: How people reason about the acquisition of ownership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(9), 1161–1169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210378513

11.

Gelman

S. A.

Manczak

E. M.

Noles

N. S.

(2012). The nonobvious basis of ownership: Preschool children trace the history and value of owned objects. Child Development, 83(5), 1732–1747. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01806.x

12.

Kanngiesser

Hood

(2014). Not by labor alone: Considerations for value influence use of the labor rule in ownership transfers. Cognitive Science, 38(2), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12095

13.

Kanngiesser

Itakura

Zhou

Kanda

Ishiguro

Hood

(2015). The role of social eye-gaze in children’s and adults’ ownership attributions to robotic agents in three cultures. Interaction Studies, 16(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.1.01kan

14.

Kanngiesser

Rossano

Frickel

Tomm

Tomasello

(2020). Children, but not great apes, respect ownership. Developmental Science, 23(1), Article e12842. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12842

15.

Kim

Kalish

C. W.

(2009). Children’s ascriptions of property rights with changes of ownership. Cognitive Development, 24(3), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.03.004

16.

Levene

Starmans

Friedman

(2015). Creation in judgments about the establishment of ownership. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.011

17.

Zhu

(2018). Who is the rightful owner? Young children’s ownership judgments in different transfer contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01314

18.

Nancekivell

S. E.

Friedman

(2014). Mine, yours, no one’s: Children’s understanding of how ownership affects object use. Developmental Psychology, 50(7), 1845–1853. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036971

19.

Nancekivell

S. E.

Friedman

Gelman

S. A.

(2019). Ownership matters: People possess a naïve theory of ownership. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.008

20.

Pesowski

M. L.

Friedman

(2018). Using versus liking: Young children use ownership to predict actions but not to infer preferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 169, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.007

21.

Rochat

Robbins

Passos-Ferreira

Oliva

A. D.

Dias

M. D.

Guo

(2014). Ownership reasoning in children across cultures. Cognition, 132(3), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.014

22.

Rossano

Rakoczy

Tomasello

(2011). Young children’s understanding of violations of property rights. Cognition, 121(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.007

23.

Saylor

M. M.

Ganea

P. A.

Vázquez

M. D.

(2011). What’s mine is mine: Twelve-month-olds use possessive pronouns to identify referents. Developmental Science, 14(4), 859–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01034.x

24.

Shaw

Olson

K. R.

(2012). Children apply principles of physical ownership to ideas. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1383–1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01265.x

25.

Tatone

Hernik

Csibra

(2019). Minimal cues of possession transfer compel infants to ascribe the goal of giving. Open Mind, 3, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00024

26.

Watson

(2005). Ideas: A history from fire to Freud. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

1.31 MB