In recent work, Kovács, Téglás, and Endress (2010) argued that human adults automatically represented other agents’ beliefs even when those beliefs were completely irrelevant to the task being performed. In a series of 13 experiments, we replicated these previous findings but demonstrated that the effects found arose from artifacts in the experimental paradigm. In particular, the critical findings demonstrating automatic belief computation were driven by inconsistencies in the timing of an attention check, and thus do not provide evidence for automatic theory of mind in adults.
BackE.ApperlyI. A. (2010). Two sources of evidence on the non-automaticity of true and false belief ascription. Cognition, 115, 54–70. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.008
2.
Baron-CohenS. (1989). The autistic child’s theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285–297. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1989.tb00241.x
3.
Baron-CohenS.LeslieA. M.FrithU. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?Cognition, 21, 37–46. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
4.
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
BennettJ. (1978). Some remarks about concepts. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1, 557–560. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00076573
7.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ.RothsteinH. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 97–111.
8.
CarlsonS. M.MosesL. J.BretonC. (2002). How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development, 11, 73–92. doi:10.1002/icd.298
9.
CohenA. S.GermanT. C. (2009). Encoding of others’ beliefs without overt instruction. Cognition, 111, 356–363. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.004
10.
DennettD. C. (1978). Beliefs about beliefs. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1, 568. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00076664
GelmanA.HillJ. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GriceH. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
HalaS.HugS.HendersonA. (2003). Executive function and false-belief understanding in preschool children: Two tasks are harder than one. Journal of Cognition and Development, 4, 275–298. doi:10.1207/S15327647JCD0403_03
15.
HareB.TomaselloM. (2004). Chimpanzees are more skilful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks. Animal Behaviour, 68, 571–581. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.11.011
16.
HermanL. M.KantowitzB. H. (1970). The psychological refractory period effect: Only half the double-stimulation story?Psychological Bulletin, 73, 74–88. doi:10.1037/h0028357
17.
HeyesC. (2014). False belief in infancy: A fresh look. Developmental Science, 17, 647–659. doi:10.1111/desc.12148
18.
JaegerT. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.
19.
KeysarB.LinS.BarrD. J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89, 25–41. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00064-7
20.
KnudsenB.LiszkowskiU. (2012). Eighteen- and 24-month-old infants correct others in anticipation of action mistakes. Developmental Science, 15, 113–122. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01098.x
KovácsA. M.TéglásE.EndressA. D. (2010). The social sense: Susceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science, 330, 1830–1834. doi:10.1126/science.1190792
23.
LowJ.PernerJ. (2012). Implicit and explicit theory of mind: State of the art. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 1–13. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02074.x
MüllerU.ZelazoP. D.ImrisekS. (2005). Executive function and children’s understanding of false belief: How specific is the relation?Cognitive Development, 20, 173–189. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.12.004
Open Science Collaboration. (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 657–660. doi:10.1177/1745691612462588
28.
PylyshynZ. W. (1978). When is attribution of beliefs justified?Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1, 592–593. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00076895
29.
SimonsohnU. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26, 559–569. doi:10.1177/0956797614567341
30.
SurianL.CaldiS.SperberD. (2007). Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 18, 580–586. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01943.x
31.
SurianL.GeraciA. (2012). Where will the triangle look for it? Attributing false beliefs to a geometric shape at 17 months. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 30–44. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02046.x
32.
TelfordC. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1–36. doi:10.1037/h0073262
33.
van der WelR. P.SebanzN.KnoblichG. (2014). Do people automatically track others’ beliefs? Evidence from a continuous measure. Cognition, 130, 128–133. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.004
34.
WertzA. E.GermanT. C. (2007). Belief–desire reasoning in the explanation of behavior: Do actions speak louder than words?Cognition, 105, 184–194. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.08.002
35.
WimmerH. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
36.
YoungL.CushmanF.HauserM.SaxeR. (2007). The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 8235–8240. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701408104
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
