Does it matter if your personality fits in with the personalities of the people where you live? The present study explored the links between person-city personality fit and self-esteem. Using data from 543,934 residents of 860 U.S. cities, we examined the extent to which the fit between individuals’ Big Five personality traits and the Big Five traits of the city where they live (i.e., the prevalent traits of the city’s inhabitants) predicts individuals’ self-esteem. To provide a benchmark for these effects, we also estimated the degree to which the fit between person and city religiosity predicts individuals’ self-esteem. The results provided a nuanced picture of the effects of person-city personality fit on self-esteem: We found significant but small effects of fit on self-esteem only for openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, rather than effects for all Big Five traits. Similar results and effect sizes were observed for religiosity. We conclude with a discussion of the relevance and limitations of this study.
BleidornW.KlimstraT. A.DenissenJ. J.RentfrowP. J.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2013). Personality maturation around the world. A cross-cultural examination of social-investment theory. Psychological Science, 24, 2530–2540. doi:10.1177/0956797613498396
2.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
EdwardsJ. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In DrasgowF.SchmittN. W. (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350–400). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
FloridaR. (2008). Who’s your city?: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
5.
FrenchJ. R. P.Jr.RodgersW.CobbS. (1974). Adjustment as person-environment fit. In CoelhoG. V.HamburgD. A.AdamsJ. E. (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 316–333). New York, NY: Basic Books.
6.
FulmerC. A.GelfandM. J.KruglanskiA. W.Kim-PrietoC.DienerE.PierroA.HigginsE. T. (2010). On “feeling right” in cultural contexts: How person-culture match affects self-esteem and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 21, 1563–1569. doi:10.1177/0956797610384742
7.
GebauerJ. E.BleidornW.GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.LambM. E.PotterJ. (2014). Cross-cultural variations in Big Five relationships with religiosity: A sociocultural motives perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 1064–1091. doi:10.1037/a0037683
8.
GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC.NeberichW. (2012). Religiosity, social self-esteem, and psychological adjustment on the cross-cultural specificity of the psychological benefits of religiosity. Psychological Science, 23, 158–160. doi:10.1177/0956797611427045
9.
GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC.SchönbrodtF. D.BleidornW.RentfrowP. J.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2015). Religiosity as social value: Replication and extension. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10.
GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC.WagnerJ.BleidornW.RentfrowP. J.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2015). Cultural norm-fulfillment, interpersonal-belonging, or getting-ahead? A large-scale cross-cultural test of three perspectives on the function of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 526–548. doi:10.1037/pspp0000052
11.
GoslingS. D.VazireS.SrivastavaS.JohnO. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93
12.
HardinC. D.HigginsE. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Vol. 3. The interpersonal context (pp. 28–84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13.
HigginsE. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 209–213. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00366.x
14.
JohnO. P.DonahueE. M.KentleR. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory—Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
15.
JokelaM.BleidornW.LambM. E.GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J. (2015). Geographically varying associations between personality and life satisfaction in the London metropolitan area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 725–730. doi:10.1073/pnas.1415800112
16.
LearyM. R. (1999). The social and psychological importance of self-esteem. In KowalskiR. M.LearyM. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of emotional and behavioral problems: Interfaces of social and clinical psychology (pp. 197–221). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
LearyM. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.
18.
McCraeR. R.TerraccianoA., & 79 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 407–425. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.40
19.
MotylM.IyerR.OishiS.TrawalterS.NosekB. A. (2014). How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.010
20.
NakagawaS.SchielzethH. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 133–142. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
21.
NorenzayanA.HansenI. G. (2006). Belief in supernatural agents in the face of death. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 174–187. doi:10.1177/0146167205280251
22.
OrthU.RobinsR. W. (2014). The development of self-esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 381–387. doi:10.1177/0963721414547414
23.
R Development Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
24.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D.JokelaM.StillwellD. J.KosinskiM.PotterJ. (2013). Divided we stand: Three psychological regions of the United States and their political, economic, social, and health correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 996–1012. doi:10.1037/a0034434
25.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). A theory of the emergence, persistence, and expression of geographic variation in psychological characteristics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 339–369. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00084.x
26.
RobertsB. W.RobinsR. W. (2004). Person-environment fit and its implications for personality development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 72, 89–110. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00257.x
27.
RobinsR. W.HendinH. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002
28.
RobinsR. W.TracyJ. L.TrzesniewskiK.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2001). Personality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 463–482. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2001.2324
29.
RousseeuwP. J.RutsI.TukeyJ. W. (1999). The bagplot: A bivariate boxplot. The American Statistician, 53, 382–387. doi:10.1080/00031305.1999.10474494
SotoC. J.JohnO. P.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of Big Five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 718–737. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718
32.
SwannW. B.Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In SulsJ.GreenwaldA. G. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 33–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
