Although left-hemisphere (LH) specialization for language is often viewed as a key example of functional lateralization, there is increasing evidence that the right hemisphere (RH) can also extract meaning from words and sentences. However, the right hemisphere’s ability to appreciate syntactic aspects of language remains poorly understood. In the current study, we used separable, functionally well-characterized electrophysiological indices of lexico-semantic and syntactic processes to demonstrate RH sensitivity to syntactic violations among right-handers with a strong manual preference. Critically, however, the nature of this RH sensitivity to structural information was modulated by a genetically determined factor—familial sinistrality. The right hemisphere in right-handers without left-handed family members processed syntactic violations via the words’ accompanying lexico-semantic unexpectedness. In contrast, the right hemisphere in right-handers with left-handed family members could process syntactic information in a manner qualitatively similar to that of the left hemisphere.
AnnettM. (1998). Handedness and cerebral dominance: The right shift theory. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 10, 459–469. doi:10.1176/jnp.10.4.459
2.
ArambelS. R.ChiarelloC. (2006). Priming nouns and verbs: Differential influences of semantic and grammatical cues in the two cerebral hemispheres. Brain & Language, 97, 12–24. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.003
3.
AtchleyR. A.BurgessC.KeeneyM. (1999). The effect of time course and context on the facilitation of semantic features in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychology, 13, 389–403. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.13.3.389
4.
BanichM. T. (2003). The divided visual field technique in laterality and interhemispheric integration. In HugdahlK. (Ed.), Experimental methods in neuropsychology (pp. 47–64). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1163-2_3
5.
BelgerA.BanichM. T. (1998). Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: A computational perspective. Neuropsychology, 12, 380–398. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.38
6.
BookheimerS. (2002). Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 151–188. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946
7.
BrownJ. W.HécaenH. (1976). Lateralization and language representation: Observations on aphasia in children, left-handers, and “anomalous” dextrals. Neurology, 26, 183–189. doi:10.1212/WNL.26.2.183
8.
CabezaR.AndersonN. D.LocantoreJ. K.McIntoshA. R. (2002). Aging gracefully: Compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults. NeuroImage, 17, 1394–1402. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1280
9.
CaplanD.AlpertN.WatersG.OlivieriA. (2000). Activation of Broca’s area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation. Human Brain Mapping, 9, 65–71. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(200002)9:2<65::AID-HBM1>3.0.CO;2-4
10.
ChiarelloC.VazquezD.FeltonA.LeonardC. M. (2013). Structural asymmetry of anterior insula: Behavioral correlates and individual differences. Brain & Language, 126, 109–122. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.03.005
11.
ChristmanS. D.PropperR. E. (2001). Superior episodic memory is associated with interhemispheric processing. Neuropsychology, 15, 607–616. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.15.4.607
12.
CohenL.LehéricyS.HenryC.BourgeoisM.LarroqueC.Sainte-RoseC.. . . Hertz-PannierL. (2004). Learning to read without a left occipital lobe: Right-hemispheric shift of visual word form area. Annals of Neurology, 56, 890–894. doi:10.1002/ana.20326
13.
CorballisM. C. (2009). The evolution and genetics of cerebral asymmetry. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 867–879. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0232
14.
CoulsonS.WuY. C. (2005). Right hemisphere activation of joke-related information: An event-related brain potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 494–506. doi:10.1162/0898929053279568
15.
DaleA. M. (1994). Source localization and spatial discriminant analysis of event-related potentials: Linear approaches. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
16.
DelisD. C.WapnerW.GardnerH.MosesJ. A. (1983). The contribution of the right hemisphere to the organization of paragraphs. Cortex, 19, 43–50. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(83)80049-5
17.
De VreeseL. P.NeriM.RubichiS.SalvioliG. (1996). Grammatical ambiguity resolution in right hemisphere-damaged patients: Evidence from an insertion task. Aphasiology, 10, 801–814. doi:10.1080/02687039608248451
18.
FedermeierK. D.SegalJ. B.LombrozoT.KutasM. (2000). Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context. Brain, 123, 2552–2566. doi:10.1093/brain/123.12.2552
19.
FedermeierK. D.WlotkoE. W.MeyerA. M. (2008). What’s “right” in language comprehension: Event-related potentials reveal right hemisphere language capabilities. Language & Linguistics Compass, 2, 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00042.x
20.
FrancksC.MaegawaS.LaurénJ.AbrahamsB. S.Velayos-BaezaA.MedlandS. E.. . . MonacoA. P. (2007). LRRTM1 on chromosome 2p12 is a maternally suppressed gene that is associated paternally with handedness and schizophrenia. Molecular Psychiatry, 12, 1129–1139. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4002053
21.
GazzanigaM. S.HillyardS. A. (1971). Language and speech capacity of the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia, 9, 273–280. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90022-4
22.
HamiltonR. H.ChrysikouE. G.CoslettB. (2011). Mechanisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulation. Brain & Language, 118, 40–50. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.02.005
HauserM. D.ChomskyN.FitchW. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science, 298, 1569–1579. doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
HoptmanM. J.DavidsonR. J. (1994). How and why do the two cerebral hemispheres interact?Psychological Bulletin, 116, 195–219. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.195
27.
JustM. A.CarpenterP. A.KellerT. A.EddyW. F.ThulbornK. R. (1996). Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science, 274, 114–116. doi:10.1126/science.274.5284.114
28.
KarbeH.ThielA.Weber-LuxenburgerG.HerholzK.JosefK.HeissW.-D. (1998). Brain plasticity in poststroke aphasia: What is the contribution of the right hemisphere?Brain & Language, 64, 215–230.
29.
KeeD. W.BathurstK.HelligeJ. B. (1983). Lateralized interference of repetitive finger tapping: Influence of familial handedness, cognitive load and verbal production. Neuropsychologia, 21, 617–624. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(83)90059-3
30.
KnechtS.DeppeM.DrägerB.BobeL.LohmannH.RingelsteinE.-B.HenningsenH. (2000). Language lateralization in healthy right-handers. Brain, 123, 74–81. doi:10.1093/brain/123.1.74
31.
KuperbergG. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23–49. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063
32.
KutasM.FedermeierK. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
33.
LiuS. R. A.ChiarelloC.QuanN. (1999). Hemispheric sensitivity to grammatical cues: Evidence for bilateral processing of number agreement in noun phrases. Brain & Language, 70, 483–503. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2185
34.
LuriaA. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia: Its syndromes, psychology and treatment. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
35.
MoroA.TettamantiM.PeraniD.DonatiC.CappaS. F.FazioF. (2001). Syntax and the brain: Disentangling grammar by selective anomalies. NeuroImage, 13, 110–118. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0668
36.
NoguchiY.TakeuchiT.SakaiK. L. (2002). Lateralized activation in the inferior frontal cortex during syntactic processing: Event-related optical topography study. Human Brain Mapping, 17, 89–99. doi:10.1002/hbm.10050
37.
OldfieldR. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
38.
OsterhoutL.PoliakovA.InoueK.McLaughlinJ.ValentineG.PitkanenI.. . . HirschensohnJ. (2008). Second-language learning and changes in the brain. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 509–521. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.01.001
39.
ParkD. C.Reuter-LorenzP. (2009). The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 173–196. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656
40.
ScalfP. E.BanichM. T.KramerA. F.NarechaniaK.SimonC. D. (2007). Double take: Parallel processing by the cerebral hemispheres reduces attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 298–329. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.298
41.
SchneidermanE. I.MurasugiK. (2003). Does right hemisphere damaged patients’ impaired performance on a sentence insertion task indicate a syntactic or a lexical level deficit?Brain & Language, 85, 377–384. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00058-0
42.
SchneidermanE. I.SaddyJ. D. (1988). A linguistic deficit resulting from right-hemisphere damage. Brain & Language, 34, 38–53. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(88)90123-X
43.
SeghierM. L.KherifF.JosseG.PriceC. J. (2011). Regional and hemispheric determinants of language laterality: Implications for preoperative fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 1602–1614. doi:10.1002/hbm.21130
44.
ServiceE.HeleniusP.MauryS.SalmelinR. (2007). Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1193–1205. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1193
45.
SubiranaA. (1958). The prognosis in aphasia in relation to cerebral dominance and handedness. Brain, 81, 415–425. doi:10.1093/brain/81.3.415
46.
TownsendD. J.CarrithersC.BeverT. G. (2001). Familial handedness and access to words, meaning, and syntax during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 78, 308–331. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2469
47.
Tzourio-MazoyerN.PetitL.RazafimandimbyA.CrivelloF.ZagoL.JobardG.. . . MazoyerB. (2010). Left hemisphere lateralization for language in right-handers is controlled in part by familial sinistrality, manual preference strength, and head size. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 13314–13318. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2593-10.2010
48.
Tzourio-MazoyerN.SimonG.CrivelloF.JobardG.ZagoL.PercheyG.. . . MazoyerB. (2010). Effect of familial sinistrality on planum temporale surface and brain tissue asymmetries. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 1476–1485. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp209
49.
WeissmanD. H.BanichM. T. (2000). The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. Neuropsychology, 14, 41–59. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.14.1.41
50.
ZaidelE. (1983). On multiple representations of the lexicon in the brain—the case of two hemispheres. In Studdert-KennedyM. (Ed.), Psychobiology of language (pp. 105–125). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
