When we receive information in the presence of other people, are we sensitive to what they do or do not understand? In two event-related-potential experiments, participants read implausible sentences (e.g., “The girl had a little beak”) in contexts that rendered them plausible (e.g., “The girl dressed up as a canary for Halloween”). No semantic-processing difficulty (no N400 effect) ensued when they read the sentences while alone in the room. However, when a confederate was present who did not receive the contexts so that the critical sentences were implausible for him or her, participants exhibited processing difficulty: the social-N400 effect. This effect was obtained when participants were instructed to adopt the confederate’s perspective—and critically, even without such instructions—but not when performing a demanding comprehension task. Thus, unless mental resources are limited, comprehenders engage in modeling the minds not only of those individuals with whom they directly interact but also of those individuals who are merely present during the linguistic exchange.
AartsA. A.AndersonJ. E.AndersonC. J.AttridgeP. R.AttwoodA.AxtJ.. . . ZuniK. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, 253–267.
2.
Baron-CohenS.LeslieA. M.FrithU. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?Cognition, 21, 37–46.
3.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS. (2004). The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175.
4.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.HillJ.RasteY.PlumbI. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251.
5.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.SkinnerR.MartinJ.ClubleyE. (2001). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5–17.
BrennanS. E.GalatiA.KuhlenA. K. (2010). Two minds, one dialog: Coordinating speaking and understanding. In RossB. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 53, pp. 301–344). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
8.
Brown-SchmidtS. (2009). The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 893–900.
9.
Brown-SchmidtS.GunlogsonC.TanenhausM. K. (2008). Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition, 107, 1122–1134.
10.
ClarkH. H. (1993). Arenas of language use. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
ClarkH. H.CarlsonT. B. (1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58, 332–373.
12.
CurranT.TuckerD. M.KutasM.PosnerM. I. (1993). Topography of the N400: Brain electrical activity reflecting semantic expectancy. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 188–209.
13.
DawsonG.FernaldM. (1987). Perspective-taking ability and its relationship to the social behavior of autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 487–498.
14.
EpleyN.MorewedgeC. K.KeysarB. (2004). Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 760–768.
15.
FarrantB. M.FletcherJ.MayberyM. T. (2006). Specific language impairment, theory of mind, and visual perspective taking: Evidence for simulation theory and the developmental role of language. Child Development, 77, 1842–1853.
16.
FergusonH. J.CaneJ. E. (2015). Examining the cognitive costs of counterfactual language comprehension: Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research, 1622, 252–269.
17.
FussellS. R.KraussR. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers’ assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 378–391.
18.
HagoortP. (2003). Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 883–899.
19.
HaldL. A.Steenbeek-PlantingE. G.HagoortP. (2007). The interaction of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension. Evidence from the N400. Brain Research, 1146, 210–218.
20.
HannaJ. E.TanenhausM. K.TrueswellJ. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 43–61.
21.
HellerD.GrodnerD.TanenhausM. K. (2008). The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference. Cognition, 108, 831–836.
HugdahlK.ThomsenT.ErslandL.RimolL. M.NiemiJ. (2003). The effects of attention on speech perception: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 85, 37–48.
24.
KeysarB.BarrD. J.BalinJ. A.BraunerJ. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 32–38.
25.
KeysarB.LinS.BarrD. J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89, 25–41.
LaneL. W.FerreiraV. S. (2008). Speaker-external versus speaker-internal forces on utterance form: Do cognitive demands override threats to referential success?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1466–1481.
28.
LevinsonS. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
LinS.KeysarB.EpleyN. (2010). Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 551–556.
30.
NieuwlandM. S.Van BerkumJ. J. A. (2006a). Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research, 1118, 155–167.
31.
NieuwlandM. S.Van BerkumJ. J. A. (2006b). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1098–1111.
32.
R Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
33.
RueschemeyerS. A.GardnerT.StonerC. (2015). The social N400 effect: How the presence of other listeners affects language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 128–134.
34.
RyskinR. A.BenjaminA. S.TullisJ.Brown-SchmidtS. (2015). Perspective-taking in comprehension, production, and memory: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 898–915.
35.
ScottT. L.GalléeJ.FedorenkoE. (2017). A new fun and robust version of an fMRI localizer for the frontotemporal language system. Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 167–176.
36.
SebanzN.KnoblichG.PrinzW. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own?Cognition, 88(3), B11–B21.
37.
SebanzN.KnoblichG.PrinzW.WascherE. (2006). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in coacting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 859–870.
38.
Tager-FlusbergH.PaulR.LordC. (2013). Language and communication in autism. In VolkmarF. R.PaulR.KlinA.CohenD. (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (pp. 335–364). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
39.
TannerD.Van HellJ. G. (2014). ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing. Neuropsychologia, 56, 289–301.
40.
Van BerkumJ. J. A.KoornneefA. W.OttenM.NieuwlandM. S. (2007). Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective. Brain Research, 1146, 158–171.
41.
van den BrinkD.Van BerkumJ. J. A.BastiaansenM. C. M.TesinkC. M. J. Y.KosM.BuitelaarJ. K.HagoortP. (2012). Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 173–183.
42.
WestleyA.KohútZ.RueschemeyerS. A. (2017). “I know something you don’t know”: Discourse and social context effects on the N400 in adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 45–54.
43.
Wilkes-GibbsD.ClarkH. H. (1992). Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 183–194.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
