Signals of threat—such as fearful faces—are processed with priority and have privileged access to awareness. This fear advantage is commonly believed to engage a specialized subcortical pathway to the amygdala that bypasses visual cortex and processes predominantly low-spatial-frequency information but is largely insensitive to high spatial frequencies. We tested visual detection of low- and high-pass-filtered fearful and neutral faces under continuous flash suppression and sandwich masking, and we found consistently that the fear advantage was specific to high spatial frequencies. This demonstrates that rapid fear detection relies not on low- but on high-spatial-frequency information—indicative of an involvement of cortical visual areas. These findings challenge the traditional notion that a subcortical pathway to the amygdala is essential for the initial processing of fear signals and support the emerging view that the cerebral cortex is crucial for the processing of ecologically relevant signals.
AdolphsR. (2008). Fear, faces, and the human amygdala. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 166–172.
2.
AdolphsR.GosselinF.BuchananT. W.TranelD.SchynsP.DamasioA. R. (2005). A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage. Nature, 433, 68–72.
3.
AmaralD. G.PriceJ. L.PitkanenA.CarmichaelS. T. (1992). Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex. In AggletonJ. P. (Ed.), The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction (pp. 1–66). New York, NY: Wiley-Liss.
4.
de GelderB.VroomenJ.PourtoisG.WeiskrantzL. (1999). Non-conscious recognition of affect in the absence of striate cortex. NeuroReport, 10, 3759–3763.
IsbellL. A. (2006). Snakes as agents of evolutionary change in primate brains. Journal of Human Evolution, 51, 1–35.
7.
JackR. E.BlaisC.ScheepersC.SchynsP. G.CaldaraR. (2009). Cultural confusions show that facial expressions are not universal. Current Biology, 19, 1543–1548.
8.
JiangY.CostelloP.HeS. (2007). Processing of invisible stimuli: Advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression. Psychological Science, 18, 349–355.
9.
LammeV. A.RoelfsemaP. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571–579.
10.
LeDouxJ. E. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
11.
LeDouxJ. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184.
12.
LeventhalA. G.RodieckR. W.DreherB. (1985). Central projections of cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 237, 216–226.
13.
LinZ.HeS. (2009). Seeing the invisible: The scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry. Progress in Neurobiology, 87, 195–211.
14.
LivingstoneM.HubelD. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740–749.
15.
MeriganW. H.MaunsellJ. H. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathways?Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 369–402.
16.
MildersM.SahraieA.LoganS.DonnellonN. (2006). Awareness of faces is modulated by their emotional meaning. Emotion, 6, 10–17.
17.
MorrisJ. S.de GelderB.WeiskrantzL.DolanR. J. (2001). Differential extrageniculostriate and amygdala responses to presentation of emotional faces in a cortically blind field. Brain, 124, 1241–1252.
18.
ÖhmanA. (2005). The role of the amygdala in human fear: Automatic detection of threat. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 953–958.
19.
ÖhmanA.MinekaS. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522.
20.
PegnaA. J.KhatebA.LazeyrasF.SeghierM. L. (2005). Discriminating emotional faces without primary visual cortices involves the right amygdala. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 24–25.
21.
PessoaL. (2010). Emotion and cognition and the amygdala: From “what is it?” to “what’s to be done?”Neuropsychologia, 48, 3416–3429.
22.
PessoaL.AdolphsR. (2010). Emotion processing and the amygdala: From a “low road” to “many roads” of evaluating biological significance. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 773–782.
23.
PhelpsE. A.LeDouxJ. E. (2005). Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: From animal models to human behavior. Neuron, 48, 175–187.
24.
SchillerP. H.MalpeliJ. G.ScheinS. J. (1979). Composition of geniculostriate input to superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 42, 1124–1133.
25.
SchynsP. G.OlivaA. (1999). Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: When categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations. Cognition, 69, 243–265.
26.
SkuseD. (2006). Genetic influences on the neural basis of social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361, 2129–2141.
27.
SmithM. L.CottrellG. W.GosselinF.SchynsP. G. (2005). Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Psychological Science, 16, 184–189.
28.
SmithM. L.SchynsP. G. (2009). Smile through your fear and sadness: Transmitting and identifying facial expressions over a range of viewing distances. Psychological Science, 20, 1202–1208.
29.
TamiettoM.de GelderB. (2010). Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 697–709.
30.
TottenhamN.TanakaJ. W.LeonA. C.McCarryT.NurseM.HareT. A.. . . NelsonC. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242–249.
TsuchiyaN.MoradiF.FelsenC.YamazakiM.AdolphsR. (2009). Intact rapid detection of fearful faces in the absence of the amygdala. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 1224–1225.
33.
VlamingsP. H. J. M.GoffauxV.KemnerC. (2009). Is the early modulation of brain activity by fearful facial expressions primarily mediated by coarse low spatial frequency information?Journal of Vision, 9(5), Article 12. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/5/12
34.
VuilleumierP. (2005). How brains beware: Neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 585–594.
35.
VuilleumierP.ArmonyJ. L.DriverJ.DolanR. J. (2003). Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 624–631.
36.
WardR.DanzigerS.BamfordS. (2005). Response to threat following damage to the amygdala. Current Biology, 15, 571–573.
37.
WhalenP. J.RauchS. L.EtcoffN. L.McInerneyS. C.LeeM. B.JenikeM. A. (1998). Masked presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 411–418.
38.
WinstonJ. S.VuilleumierP.DolanR. J. (2003). Effects of low-spatial frequency components of fearful faces on fusiform cortex activity. Current Biology, 13, 1824–1829.
YangE.ZaldD. H.BlakeR. (2007). Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression. Emotion, 7, 882–886.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
