It has recently been suggested that low-spatial-frequency information would provide rapid visual cues to the amygdala for basic but ultrarapid behavioral responses to dangerous stimuli. The present behavioral study investigated the role of different spatial-frequency channels in visually detecting dangerous stimuli belonging to living or nonliving categories. Subjects were engaged in a visual detection task involving dangerous stimuli, and subjects’ behavioral responses were assessed in association with their fear expectations (induced by an aversive 90-dB white noise). Our results showed that, despite its crudeness, low-spatial-frequency information could constitute a sufficient signal for fast recognition of visual danger in a context of fear expectation. In addition, we found that this effect tended to be specific for living entities. These results were obtained despite a strong perceptual bias toward faster recognition of high-spatial-frequency stimuli under supraliminal perception durations.
BecharaA.TranelD.DamasioH.AdolphsR.RocklandC.DamasioA.R. (1995). Double dissociation of conditioning and declarative knowledge relative to the amygdala and hippocampus in humans. Science, 269, 1115–1118.
4.
BocanegraB.R.ZeelenbergR. (2009). Emotion improves and impairs early vision. Psychological Science, 20, 707–713.
5.
BullierJ. (2001). Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Research Reviews, 36, 96–107.
6.
DelgadoM.R.OlssonA.PhelpsE.A. (2006). Extending animal models of fear conditioning to humans. Biological Psychology, 73, 39–48.
7.
GreenwaldA.G.DraineS.C.AbramsR.L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273, 1699–1702.
8.
GuyaderN.ChauvinA.PeyrinC.HéraultJ.MarendazC. (2004). Image phase or amplitude? Rapid scene categorization is an amplitude based process. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 327, 313–318.
9.
HolmesA.GreenS.VuilleumierP. (2005). The involvement of distinct visual channels in rapid attention towards fearful facial expressions. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 899–922.
10.
HolmesA.WinstonJ.S.EimerM. (2005). The role of spatial frequency information for ERP components sensitive to faces and emotional facial expression. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 508–520.
11.
HughesH.C.NozawaG.KitterleF.L. (1996). Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistic of the natural image. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 197–230.
12.
LangP.J.BradleyM.M.CuthbertB.N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report A-6). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
13.
LedouxJ. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
14.
LivingstoneM.HubelD. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740–749.
15.
LöwA.LangP.J.SmithJ.C.BradleyM.M. (2008). Both predator and prey: Emotional arousal in threat and reward. Psychological Science, 19, 865–873.
16.
MermillodM.BoninP.MondillonL.AlleyssonD.VermeulenN. (in press). Coarse scales are sufficient for efficient categorization of emotional facial expressions: Evidence from neural computation. Neurocomputing.
17.
MermillodM.VermeulenN.LundqvistD.NiedenthalP.M. (2009). Neural computation as a tool to differentiate perceptual from emotional processes: The case of anger superiority effect. Cognition, 110, 346–357.
18.
MermillodM.VuilleumierP.PeyrinC.AlleyssonD.MarendazC. (2009). The importance of low spatial frequency information for recognizing fearful facial expressions. Connection Science, 21, 75–83.
19.
MorrisJ.S.ÖhmanA.DolanR.J. (1999). A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96, 1680–1685.
20.
ÖhmanA.LundqvistD.EstevesF. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 381–396.
21.
ÖhmanA.SoaresJ.J.F. (1993). On the automaticity of phobic fear: Conditioned electrodermal responses to masked fear-relevant stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 121–132.
22.
ParkerD.M.LishmanJ.R.HughesJ. (1997). Evidence for the view that temporospatial integration in vision is temporally anisotropic. Perception, 26, 1169–1180.
23.
PeyrinC.ChokronS.GuyaderN.GoutO.MoretJ.MarendazC. (2006). Neural correlates of spatial frequency processing: A neuropsychological approach. Brain Research, 1073, 1–10.
24.
PeyrinC.MermillodM.ChokronS.MarendazC. (2006). Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing. Brain and Cognition, 62, 214–220.
25.
PhelpsE.A.O’ConnorK.J.GatenbyJ.C.GrillonC.GoreJ.C.DavisM. (2001). Activation of the left amygdala to a cognitive representation of fear. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 437–441.
26.
PourtoisG.DanE.S.GrandjeanD.SanderD.VuilleumierP. (2005). Enhanced extrastriate visual response to bandpass spatial frequency filtered fearful faces: Time course and topographic evoked-potentials mapping. Human Brain Mapping, 26, 65–79.
27.
SchillerP.H.MalpeliJ.G.ScheinS.J. (1979). Composition of geniculostriate input to the superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 42, 1124–1133.
28.
SchynsP.G.OlivaA. (1994). From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science, 5, 195–200.
29.
SchynsP.G.OlivaA. (1999). Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: When categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations. Cognition, 69, 243–265.
30.
SmithF.W.SchynsP.G. (2009). Smile through your fear and sadness: Transmitting and identifying facial expression signals over a range of viewing distances. Psychological Science, 20, 1202–1208.
