Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Recent research in behavioral genetics has found evidence for a Gene × Environment interaction on cognitive ability: Individual differences in cognitive ability among children raised in socioeconomically advantaged homes are primarily due to genes, whereas environmental factors are more influential for children from disadvantaged homes. We investigated the developmental origins of this interaction in a sample of 750 pairs of twins measured on the Bayley Short Form test of infant mental ability, once at age 10 months and again at age 2 years. A Gene × Environment interaction was evident on the longitudinal change in mental ability over the study period. At age 10 months, genes accounted for negligible variation in mental ability across all levels of socioeconomic status (SES). However, genetic influences emerged over the course of development, with larger genetic influences emerging for infants raised in higher-SES homes. At age 2 years, genes accounted for nearly 50% of the variation in mental ability of children raised in high-SES homes, but genes continued to account for negligible variation in mental ability of children raised in low-SES homes.

Keywords

gene-environment interaction socioeconomic status infancy cognitive development intelligence behavioral genetics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andreassen

Fletcher

(2007). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS−B) psychometric report for the 2-year data collection (NCES 2007−084). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.

Asbury

Wachs

T.D.

Plomin

(2005). Environmental moderators of genetic influence on verbal and nonverbal abilities in early childhood. Intelligence, 33, 643–661.

Bayley

(1993). Bayley Scales of Infant Development (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.

Bornstein

M.H.

Sigman

M.D.

(1986). Continuity in mental development from infancy. Child Development, 57, 251–274.

Bradley

R.H.

Corwyn

R.F.

(2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399.

Bradley

R.H.

Corwyn

R.F.

McAdoo

H.P.

Coll

C.G.

(2001). The home environments of children in the United States Part I: Variation by age, ethnicity, and poverty status. Child Development, 72, 1844–1867.

Brehmer

S.-C.

Müller

von Oertzen

Lindenberger

(2007). Memory plasticity across the life span: Uncovering children’s latent potential. Developmental Psychology, 43, 465–478.

Bronfenbrenner

Ceci

S.J.

(1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586.

Davis

O.S.P.

Haworth

C.M.A.

Plomin

(2009). Dramatic increases in heritability of cognitive development from early to middle childhood: An 8-year longitudinal study of 8,700 pairs of twins. Psychological Science, 20, 1301–1308.

10.

De Wolff

M.S.

van Ijzendoorn

M.H.

(1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68, 571–591.

11.

Dickens

W.T.

Flynn

J.R.

(2001). Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved. Psychological Review, 108, 346–369.

12.

Forget-Dubois

Pérusse

Turecki

Girard

Billette

J.-M.

Rouleau

. (2003). Diagnosing zygosity in infant twins: Physical similarity, genotyping, and chorionicity. Twin Research, 6, 479–485.

13.

Fulker

D.W.

DeFries

J.C.

Plomin

(1988). Genetic influence on general mental ability increases between infancy and middle childhood. Nature, 336, 767–769.

14.

Garlick

(2002). Understanding the nature of the general factor of intelligence: The role of individual differences in neural plasticity as an explanatory mechanism. Psychological Review, 109, 116–136.

15.

Goldsmith

H.H.

(1991). A zygosity questionnaire for young twins: A research note. Behavior Genetics, 21, 257–269.

16.

Guryan

Hurst

Kearney

M.S.

(2008). Parental education and parental time with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 23–46.

17.

Harden

K.P.

Turkheimer

Loehlin

J.C.

(2007). Genotype by environment interaction in adolescents’ cognitive aptitude. Behavior Genetics, 37, 273–283.

18.

Heckman

J.J.

(2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312, 1900–1902.

19.

Hollingshead

A.B.

(1975). Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

20.

Kalil

Ryan

Corey

(2010). Diverging destinies: Maternal education and investments in children. Retrieved May 15, 2010, from http://www.popcenter.umd.edu/research/sponsored-events/atus-conf-workshop-2009/papers-atus-2009/01-kalil-etal.pdf

21.

Kremen

W.S.

Jacobson

K.C.

Xian

Eisen

S.A.

Waterman

Toomey

. (2005). Heritability of word recognition in middle-aged men varies as a function of parental education. Behavior Genetics, 35, 417–433.

22.

Lenroot

R.K.

Giedd

J.N.

(2008). The changing impact of genes and environment on brain development during childhood and adolescence: Initial findings from a neuroimaging study of pediatric twins. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 1161–1175.

23.

Loehlin

J.C.

Harden

K.P.

Turkheimer

(2009). The effect of assumptions about parental assortative mating and genotype-income correlation on estimates of genotype-environment interaction in the National Merit Twin Study. Behavior Genetics, 39, 165–169.

24.

McGue

(1997). The democracy of the genes. Nature, 388, 417–418.

25.

McLoyd

V.C.

(1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53, 185–204.

26.

Muthén

L.K.

Muthén

B.O.

(2010). MPlus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.

27.

Nelson

C.A.

Zeanah

C.H.

Fox

N.A.

Marshall

P.J.

Smyke

A.T.

Guthrie

(2007). Cognitive recovery in socially deprived young children: The Bucharest Early Intervention Project. Science, 318, 1937–1940.

28.

Noble

K.G.

McCandliss

B.D.

Farah

M.J.

(2007). Socioeconomic gradients predict individual differences in neurocognitive abilities. Developmental Science, 10, 464–480.

29.

Pennington

B.F.

McGrath

L.M.

Rosenberg

Barnard

Smith

S.D.

Willcutt

E.G.

. (2009). Gene × environment interactions in reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Psychology, 45, 77–89.

30.

Posthuma

De Geus

E.J.C.

Baare

W.F.C.

Pol

H.E.H.

Kahn

R.S.

Boomsma

D.I.

(2002). The association between brain volume and intelligence is of genetic origin. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 83–84.

31.

Price

T.S.

Freeman

Craig

Petrill

S.A.

Ebersole

Plomin

(2000). Infant zygosity can be assigned by parental report questionnaire data. Twin Research, 3, 129–133.

32.

Purcell

(2002). Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Research, 5, 554–571.

33.

Rose

S.A.

Feldman

J.F.

(1995). Prediction of IQ and specific cognitive abilities at 11 years from infancy measures. Developmental Psychology, 31, 685–696.

34.

Rowe

D.C.

Jacobson

K.C.

Van den Oord

E.J.C.G.

(1999). Genetic and environmental influences on vocabulary IQ: Parental education level as moderator. Child Development, 70, 1151–1162.

35.

Scarr

McCartney

(1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype → environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.

36.

Toga

A.W.

Thompson

P.M.

(2005). Genetics of brain structure and intelligence. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 1–23.

37.

Tucker-Drob

E.M.

(2010). How many pathways underlie socioeconomic differences in children’s cognition and achievement? Manuscript submitted for publication.

38.

Turkheimer

Haley

Waldron

D’Onofrio

Gottesman

(2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14, 623–628.

39.

van der Sluis

Willemsen

de Geus

E.J.

Boomsma

D.I.

Posthuma

(2008). Gene-environment interaction in adults’ IQ scores: Measures of past and present environment. Behavior Genetics, 38, 348–360.

40.

White

K.R.

(1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

Emergence of a Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Infant Mental Ability Between 10 Months and 2 Years

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material