Studies of intelligence in children reveal significantly higher heritability among groups with high socioeconomic status (SES) than among groups with low SES. These interaction effects, however, have not been examined in adults, when between-families environmental effects are reduced. Using 1,702 adult twins (aged 24–84) for whom intelligence assessment data were available, we tested for interactions between childhood SES and genetic effects, between-families environmental effects, and unique environmental effects. Higher SES was associated with higher mean intelligence scores. Moreover, the magnitude of genetic influences on intelligence was proportional to SES. By contrast, environmental influences were constant. These results suggest that rather than setting lower and upper bounds on intelligence, genes multiply environmental inputs that support intellectual growth. This mechanism implies that increasing SES may raise average intelligence but also magnifies individual differences in intelligence.
AkaikeH. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. doi:10.1007/BF02294359
2.
BatesT. C.LewisG. J. (2012). Towards a genetically informed approach in the social sciences: Strengths and an opportunity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 374–380. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.002
3.
BokerS.NealeM.MaesH.WildeM.SpiegelM.BrickT.. . . FoxJ. (2011). OpenMx: An open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika, 76, 306–317. doi:10.1007/s11336-010-9200-6
4.
BrimO.G.RyffC.D.KesslerR. C. (Eds.). (2004). How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BronfenbrennerU.CeciS. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.568
6.
DearyI. J. (2012). Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 453–482. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100353
7.
DearyI. J.SpinathF. M.BatesT. C. (2006). Genetics of intelligence. European Journal of Human Genetics, 14, 690–700. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201588
8.
DuncanO. D. (1961). A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In ReissJ. J. (Ed.), Occupations and social status (pp. 109–138). New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.
9.
FlynnJ. R. (2009). What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
10.
GieddJ. N.BlumenthalJ.JeffriesN. O.CastellanosF. X.LiuH.ZijdenbosA.. . . RapoportJ. L. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 861–863. doi:10.1038/13158
11.
GottesmanI. I.ShieldsJ. (1982). Schizophrenia: The epigenetic puzzle. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GrantM. D.KremenW. S.JacobsonK. C.FranzC.XianH.EisenS. A.. . . LyonsM. J. (2010). Does parental education have a moderating effect on the genetic and environmental influences of general cognitive ability in early adulthood?Behavior Genetics, 40, 438–446. doi: 10.1007/s10519-010-9351-3
13.
HanscombeK. B.TrzaskowskiM.HaworthC. M.DavisO. S.DaleP. S.PlominR. (2012). Socioeconomic status (SES) and children’s intelligence (IQ): In a UK-representative sample SES moderates the environmental, not genetic, effect on IQ. PLoS ONE, 7, e30320. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030320
14.
HardenK. P.TurkheimerE.LoehlinJ. C. (2007). Genotype by environment interaction in adolescents’ cognitive aptitude. Behavior Genetics, 37, 273–283. doi:10.1007/S10519-006-91134
15.
HarrisJ. R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458–489. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.458
16.
HaworthC. M.WrightM. J.LucianoM.MartinN. G.de GeusE. J.van BeijsterveldtC. E.. . . PlominR. (2010). The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from childhood to young adulthood. Molecular Psychiatry, 15, 1112–1120. doi:10.1038/mp.2009.55
17.
KennedyW. A.VanderietV.WhiteJ. C. (1963). A normative sample of intelligence and achievement of Negro elementary school children in the Southeastern United-States. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 28(6).
18.
LezakM. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
LoehlinJ. C.HardenK. P.TurkheimerE. (2009). The effect of assumptions about parental assortative mating and genotype-income correlation on estimates of genotype–environment interaction in the National Merit Twin Study. Behavior Genetics, 39, 165–169. doi:10.1007/s10519-008-9253-9
20.
McGueM.BouchardT. J.Jr. (1984). Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behavior Genetics, 14, 325–343. doi:10.1007/BF01080045
21.
PurcellS. (2002). Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Research, 5, 554–571.
22.
R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.R-project.org
23.
RhemtullaM.Tucker-DrobE. M. (2012). Gene-by-socioeconomic status interaction on school readiness. Behavior Genetics, 42, 549–558. doi:10.1007/s10519-012-9527-0
24.
RoweD. C.JacobsonK. C.Van den OordE. J. (1999). Genetic and environmental influences on vocabulary IQ: Parental education level as moderator. Child Development, 70, 1151–1162. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00084
25.
SackettP. R.KuncelN. R.BeattyA. S.RigdonJ. L.ShenW.KigerT. B. (2012). The role of socioeconomic status in SAT-grade relationships and in college admissions decisions. Psychological Science, 23, 1000–1007. doi:10.1177/0956797612438732
26.
SalthouseT. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
27.
SalthouseT. A.PrillK. A. (1987). Inferences about age impairments in inferential reasoning. Psychology and Aging, 2, 43–51. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.2.1.43
28.
ShawP.GreensteinD.LerchJ.ClasenL.LenrootR.GogtayN.. . . GieddJ. (2006). Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature, 440, 676–679. doi:10.1038/nature04513
29.
TaylorJ.RoehrigA. D.Soden HenslerB.ConnorC. M.SchatschneiderC. (2010). Teacher quality moderates the genetic effects on early reading. Science, 328, 512–514. doi:10.1126/science.1186149
30.
Tucker-DrobE. M.RhemtullaM.HardenK. P.TurkheimerE.FaskD. (2011). Emergence of a Gene × Socioeconomic Status interaction on infant mental ability between 10 months and 2 years. Psychological Science, 22, 125–133. doi:10.1177/0956797610392926
TurkheimerE.GottesmanI. I. (1991). Individual differences and the canalization of human behavior. Developmental Psychology, 27, 18–22. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.18
33.
TurkheimerE.HaleyA.WaldronM.D’OnofrioB.GottesmanI. I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14, 623–628. doi:10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1475.x
34.
van der SluisS.PosthumaD.DolanC. V. (2012). A note on false positives and power in G × E modelling of twin data. Behavior Genetics, 42, 170–186. doi:10.1007/s10519-011-9480-3
35.
van der SluisS.WillemsenG.de GeusE. J.BoomsmaD. I.PosthumaD. (2008). Gene–environment interaction in adults’ IQ scores: Measures of past and present environment. Behavior Genetics, 38, 348–360. doi:10.1007/s10519-008-9212-5
36.
WechslerD. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
