Despite considerable housing deficits, particularly in Africa, and the prioritization of housing agendas by many governments, there is relatively little research on the most cost-effective approaches to use. This paper provides a comparative analysis of four programmes addressing the housing needs of the residents of one Namibian town. The analysis informs our understanding of the most cost-effective and affordable ways to reach the town’s low-income residents. The research developed a financial framework to estimate both direct and indirect costs. We show that the lowest-cost approach is in situ upgrading; that higher-cost solutions, only affordable to higher-income groups, have higher unit subsidies; and that many subsidies are not explicit but reflect financial contributions that are not tracked. This analysis addresses a gap in the housing literature; despite widely recognized policy and programming challenges, there is little that addresses the need of policymakers for evidence about what works.
AalbersM B (2016), The Financialization of Housing: A Political Economy Approach, Routledge, Abingdon.
2.
AliuI R, et al. (2018), “Housing policy debacle in Sub-Saharan Africa: an appraisal of three housing programs in Lagos Nigeria”, African Geographic ReviewVol 37, No 3, pages 241–256.
3.
AnandNRademacherA (2011), “Housing in the urban age: inequality and aspiration in Mumbai”, AntipodeVol 43, No 5, pages 1748–1772, available at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00887.x.
4.
Bank of Namibia (2023), “Annual report 2023”.
5.
BeardV A, et al. (2018), “Towards a more equal city: framing the challenges and opportunities”, Working paper, World Resource Institute, Washington, DC.
6.
BeierR (2021), “From visible informality to splintered informalities: reflections on the production of ‘formality’ in a Moroccan housing programme”, International Journal of Urban and Regional ResearchVol 45, No 6, pages 930–947.
7.
BeierR (2023), “Why low-income people leave state housing in South Africa: progress, failure or temporary setback”, Environment and UrbanizationVol 35, No 1, pages 177–188.
BoonyabanchaSKerrT (2018), “Lessons from CODI on co-production”, Environment and UrbanizationVol 30, No 2, pages 444–460.
10.
BuckleyBJKalarickal (editors) (2006), “Thirty years of World Bank shelter lending: what have we learned?”, Directions in Development: Infrastructure, The World Bank, Washington.
BuckleyR MKallergisAWainerL (2016), “Addressing the housing challenge: avoiding the Ozymandias syndrome”, Environment and UrbanizationVol 28, No 1, pages 119–138.
13.
BurraSMitlinDMenon withGAgarwalIBanarsePGimonkarSLoboMPatelSRaoVWaghmareM (2018), “Understanding the contribution of the BSUP (JNNURM) to inclusive cities in India”, Effective States and Inclusive Development Research Centre Working Paper No 97, Effective States and Inclusive Development Research Centre, Manchester.
14.
CAHF (Centre for Affordable Housing Finance in Africa) (2021), “2021 yearbook”, CAHF, Johannesburg.
15.
CalderónJ (2004), “The formalisation of property in Peru 2001–2002: the case of Lima”, Habitat InternationalVol 28, pages 289–300.
ConnollyP (2004), “The Mexican national popular housing fund”, in MitlinDSatterthwaiteD (editors), Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction, Earthscan, London, pages 82–111.
18.
DasA (2018), “Is innovative also effective? A critique of pro-poor shelter in South-East Asia”, International Journal of Housing PolicyVol 18, No 2, pages 233–265.
19.
DelgadoG (2019), “Land and housing practices in Namibia: cases of access to land rights and production of housing in Windhoek, Oshakati and Gobabis”, PhD thesis, University of Cape Town, available at https://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/31363.
20.
de VriesWLewisJ (2009), “Are urban land tenure regulations in Namibia the solution or the problem?”, Land Use PolicyVol 26, pages 1116–1127.
21.
FieuwW (2015), “Deep rooted knowledge? Assessing the lack of community participation in UISP projects”, in Pursuit of Responsible and Responsive Local Governance: Perspectives from Civil Society on Local Governance in South Africa, Good Governance Learning Network, Cape Town, pages 59–73.
22.
GilbertA (2014), “Free housing for the poor: an effective way to address poverty”, Habitat InternationalVol 41, pages 253–261.
23.
GillespieT (2020), “The real estate frontier”, International Journal of Urban and Regional ResearchVol 44, No 4, pages 599–616.
24.
GillespieTSchindlerS (2022), “Africa’s new urban spaces: deindustrialisation, infrastructure-led development and real estate frontiers”, Review of African Political EconomyVol 49, No 174, pages 531–549.
JoshiSKhanM S (2010), “Aided self-help. The Million Houses Programme – revising the issues”, Habitat InternationalVol 34, pages 306–314.
28.
Libertun de DurenN R (2018), “Why there? Developers’ rationale for building social housing in the urban periphery in Latin America”, CitiesVol 72, pages 411–420.
29.
LinesKMitlinDMweluJNjenga MainaJ POkoyoOOtibineEWakeshoTWambuiM (2020), “Bridging the affordability gap: towards a financing mechanism for slum upgrading at scale in Nairobi – analysing NGO experiences with local-level finance”, GDI Working Paper, Global Development Institute, University of Manchester.
30.
LühlPDelgadoG (2016), “A critical analysis of the mass housing programme”, in BankieB FJauchH (editors), The Urban Housing Crisis in Namibia: A Youth Perspective, National Youth Council, Windhoek, pages 208–225.
MitlinDSBartlett (editors) (2020), “Rethinking the roles of the state and communities in urban housing and land-use management II” [special issue], Environment and UrbanizationVol 32, No 2, available at https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/eaua/32/2.
OlwageE (2022), “A bibliography: the urban question in Namibia”, Land, Livelihoods and Housing Working Paper, Integrated Land Management Institute, National University of Science and Technology, Windhoek.
39.
PayneG (2022), Somewhere to Live: Rising to the Global Urban Land and Housing Challenge, Practical Action Publishing, Rugby.
40.
PottsD (2020), Broken Cities: Inside the Global Housing Crisis, Zed Books, London.
RojasE (2019), “‘No time to waste’ in applying the lessons from Latin America’s 50 years of housing policies”, Environment and UrbanizationVol 31, No 1, pages 177–192, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818781499.
44.
RoystonL (2013), “In the meantime. . . Moving towards secure tenure by recognising local practice”, in NapierMBerrisfordSWanjiku KihatoCMcGaffinRRoystonL (editors), Trading Places: Accessing Land in African Cities, African Minds, Cape Town, pages 47–72.
45.
SatterthwaiteD (2020a), “Editorial: Getting housing back onto the development agenda: the many roles of housing and the many services it should provide its inhabitants”, Environment and UrbanizationVol 32, No 1, pages 1–16.
46.
SatterthwaiteD (editor) (2020b), “Rethinking the roles of the state and communities in urban housing and land-use management” [special issue], Environment and UrbanizationVol 32, No 1, available at https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/eaua/32/1.
47.
SatterthwaiteDMitlinD (2014), Reducing Urban Poverty in the Global South, Routledge, Abingdon and New York.
48.
SchlyterA (2006), “Esther’s house: one women’s ‘home economics’ in Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe”, in Fahy BrycesonDPottsD (editors), African Urban Economics: Viability, Vitality and Vitiation, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pages 254–277.
UN-Habitat (United Nations Human Settlements Programme) (2005), “The global report on human settlements 2005: shelter finance”, Earthscan for UN Habitat, London.
Whitaker FerreiraJ SRojasEDe Souza CarvalhoH RFrignaniC RSanti LupoL (2020), “Housing policies and the roles of local governments in Latin America: recent experiences”, Environment and UrbanizationVol 32, No 2, pages 333–350.
